Walksss
Registered User
- Mar 26, 2013
- 657
- 1,233
I don't really see the point in gambling on a prospect that could produce 60 points as opposed to trading the pick for a soon to be 23 year old who already has 2 60+ point seasons with little to no help. As you mentioned, some of the prospects may bring that same production as Zegras while also bringing other factors that Zegras lacks, but they also aren't guaranteed to score 60 points a season like Zegras did twice already. I'm not 100% on the get Zegras at all costs boat because it's hard to overlook all his flaws, but to say that you'd prefer a forward with 2nd line upside over the guaranteed 2nd liner doesn't make much sense.
Yeah but points aren't created equally. There's a difference between a soft perimeter player 60 points and a much harder heavier style player putting up points in your top 6.
The problem I have with Zegras in our top 6 (besides the potential acquisition cost) is we already have CC who is a dynamic scorer but very one-dimensional already. Adding in a second similar player limits our options while we round out the last position. It feels like if you acquired Zegras but then Demidov was miraculously available at your pick you wouldn't be creating the right structure in your top 6 if you took him.
I'd rather HuGo look to acquire the more well-rounded, heavier, down low top 6er for this spot, it's obviously far more effective for playoff hockey. It's true we'll still need a very talented scorer or 2 more to compete for anything but I'd prefer a guy capable of playing a more playoff-oriented game, especially since I don't want Cole going anywhere.
Not sure who the solution is but a soft top 6 is what I'm hoping to avoid in this iteration of the rebuild. Slaf and Dach is a nice start but let's round it out with another 2 bigger skilled bodies and we're going places.
Last edited: