- Jun 15, 2010
- 1,085
- 1,210
Bryson? He was so damn good, he shouldn't sit. Gilbert probably will, Sammy will take his place, and Joki will probably have to sit.I expect to see Sameulsson and Joki back in against Montreal as Bryson/GIlbert sit. Hopefully three games in the box lights a fire under their asses.
Fabbro has actually played quite a bit on the first pair with Josi and it seems to have worked in recent years. I remember Preds recently waive Tolvanen and he in Kraken showed some good results as a middle six player.
Power/Bryson struggled against the Flames. I know it was 90% on Power, but I fully expect the depth guy to pay the price.Bryson? He was so damn good, he shouldn't sit. Gilbert probably will, Sammy will take his place, and Joki will probably have to sit.
Then it would be a bad move by Ruff, because it was Power who couldn't get the puck in and Bryson who was saving his ass a lot. You can replace Gilbert with Sammy, but you definitely shouldn't touch Bryson just because Power was having a bad day or even a bad period.Power/Bryson struggled against the Flames. I know it was 90% on Power, but I fully expect the depth guy to pay the price.
I expect to see Sameulsson and Joki back in against Montreal as Bryson/GIlbert sit. Hopefully three games in the box lights a fire under their asses.
Why Jokiharju and not Sammy? You don't want to pair two RD on the third pairing when they both don't seem to be playing well on LD.Gilbert comes out. Jokiharju goes in.
Because Samuelsson has been terrible this season. Jokiharju is a RHD with positive possession stats and positive on ice results.Why Jokiharju and not Sammy? You don't want to pair two RD on the third pairing when they both don't seem to be playing well on LD.
I already told you about analytics and metrics, as we can see Ruff agrees with me. Chemistry is important, if Clifton sits down, then I agree that Jokiharju should probably replace him, but they both don't play LD.Because Samuelsson has been terrible this season. Jokiharju is a RHD with positive possession stats and positive on ice results.
There is a retain option or a hockey deal, there are teams that have cap space, also Fabbro and Jokiharju UFA in the summer, so the teams are not risking much.The bind of trying to shuffle the defense for a roll of the dice would be what does one do with roster space?
Jokiharju makes twice what Fabbro does and I doubt there are teams having cursory thoughts that they need to line up for $5M in cap hit for a Sabre defenseman who isn't even in the lineup. Even if they retain, he's the same cost as Fabbro is right now and Trotz isn't finding any takers.
Bryson has been effective and is cheap - I think of analytic teams wanting a cheap 7 and think he's a possible waiver claim. He's again being weirdly effective at defending. His biggest issue as a small, mobile defenseman remain in his lack of production offensively. Pairing him up with Power mitigates that some. Is that the risk?
Gilbert has provided jam and is also relatively cheap AAV-wise. Again, not sure demotion would be the path. Is that the risk?
If they had a free spot, I wouldn't mind them seeing what they have with a Fabbro claim, but there will be an additional move required and if Fabbro is not productive, it compounds the move since it seems they would have to trade or waive another defenseman to make it happen.
There is a retain option or a hockey deal, there are teams that have cap space, also Fabbro and Jokiharju UFA in the summer, so the teams are not risking much.
I’m less confident about Bryson, but I think getting Power with a natural righty and giving Joki a shot to prove himself tips the scale toward Bryson being the odd man out.Gilbert I can see - three penalties, a lot of his minutes late soaked by others due to it. I don't know about Bryson. In
I’m less confident about Bryson, but I think getting Power with a natural righty and giving Joki a shot to prove himself tips the scale toward Bryson being the odd man out.
Well, of course, these are mainly teams that are being rebuilding or reequipped, I think it’s possible to find some kind of deal.It's trying to fit them in now though. Most contenders are trying to bank cap space for the deadline. I think there are only 10 teams that have the available cap space for a $2.5M add (even prorated for the games played doesn't push it to 11).
We've seen this pair many times, it doesn't work, there's no chemistry.I’m less confident about Bryson, but I think getting Power with a natural righty and giving Joki a shot to prove himself tips the scale toward Bryson being the odd man out.
The Sabres win three games in a rowI already told you about analytics and metrics, as we can see Ruff agrees with me. Chemistry is important, if Clifton sits down, then I agree that Jokiharju should probably replace him, but they both don't play LD.
Well Gilbert wasn't so good yesterday, even though we won. We also don't want Byram and Dahlin to play so much ice time.The Sabres win three games in a row
Is Ruff going to shake up the line up.
Unless some one is hurt
Why would he do that?
RD market is quite limited, and I also don't really understand what Sammy's value is now.The move for a RD which I don't think Adams will do would be Samuelsson + Rosén + high pick for a Top 4 RD. Then you take Jokiharju and hope you can swap him with a top 9 forward who is struggling with their team as well.
Maybe Samuelson/Joki and Power/Clifton?I'm not a fan of the history of Power-Jokiharju in their own zone. Puts me off my morning coffee.