Jacob582
Registered User
- Oct 16, 2012
- 10,080
- 3,697
You mean Kulich? I don't believe Quinn is exempt from waivers.What line is that?
For a conditioning he can
Peterka lost waiver exemption, Quinn still has it. So he can get sent down.
You mean Kulich? I don't believe Quinn is exempt from waivers.What line is that?
For a conditioning he can
Peterka lost waiver exemption, Quinn still has it. So he can get sent down.
For ELCs signed at 18 it’s 3 yrs of the ELC unless they hit 160 g as a skater. Peterka just went over 160, Quinn is around 112.You mean Kulich? I don't believe Quinn is exempt from waivers.
Woah. This would be a huge wake-up call. I wonder if they would do it? If they truly are working in a system of accountability and reward, he should be sent down.Peterka lost waiver exemption, Quinn still has it. So he can get sent down.
McLeod has the same xGF% as Cozens. If he's passing an eye test it's because he's scored some timely goals, and is generally getting difficult deployment.
Exactly never.at what point does Power get moved to the #1 PP and displace Dahlin to the #2?
Exactly never.
at what point does Power get moved to the #1 PP and displace Dahlin to the #2?
1. The deployment part matters a lot. McLeod is getting much harder zone starts than Cozens. Having the same xGF% as a guy being set up with far easier starts it isn’t a victory lap for the player failing to do better with it. Cozens gets to start in position to score…and doesn’t. And isn’t expected to more than a guy starting on the other side of the rink against the top competition. That’s a bad number for cozens. Not proof he’s doing well. At the very least…it’s an incredible number for McLeod. Either way it isn’t a “look how good Cozens has been, actually” number.
2. No one said he hasn’t had chances. They’ve said, accurately, his stick is where those chances go to die. Every single one this year, and he was leading the team in SOG as of a couple games ago, has been a wasted opportunity. Finishing matters. I don’t give a solitary f*** how often the center on this team with the softest deployment is supposed to score when he doesn’t score any. I care a lot when that person never does. Outside of his magical shooting percentage in a contract year…Cozens isn’t a finisher. Hasn’t been. Isn’t. And until people normalize that that year was the outlier and not every other one is who he actually is…we are just spinning our wheels. They paid him for what he isn’t. Sucks. Can’t keep throwing good time after bad money
3. He’s a f***ing winger.
It still discounts that he’s doing it against harder competition with much a harder deployment. If he was in Cozens spot…he’d have an increased expected goals just due to usage. Not shooting 0% isn’t a negative.So my original post wasn't designed as a defense of Cozens so much as it points out people are exceedingly happy with McLeod because he's scored some timely goals on low percentage shots.