Dubi Doo
Registered User
- Aug 27, 2008
- 20,231
- 14,097
I mean without Dahlin and Thompson it looks really weak. But I agree about Marino, I've been talking about this for several years now.Would've been nice to replace Joki with Marino.
I swear I remember a tweet from when Granato took over about how he made them redo a drill that wasn't good enough, and the tweeter said they never saw that under krueger lol. I think it was harrington"If not done right, they do it again."
What a concept!
Kulich makes the team...Krebs makes 13, Rousek first call-up first half of the season, Kulich first call-up second half of the season. This is the way.
I'd argue they'll have a better 3rd line as well. They haven't been able to ice a legit 3rd line at any point over the last 10 years, no joke. It's always been littered with the leftovers on the roster. I suppose at one point it was Benson Mitts and Greenway. However, due to other injuries in the top 6 (Quinn), they became a defacto top 6 line.Even at full strength, the C depth is really shaky. TT and Cozens will have to stay healthy AND improve at both ends. Without that, any slump they go through will have no option to fall back on. McLeod/Krebs barely cuts it for two bottom-6 Cs, and I'm not sure they actually cut it. Quinn/Peterka have to step up to offset the loss of Skinner's production, because Zucker won't be doing that. So that's a net-zero gain too. Then on D we're hoping Jokiharju finds another gear he has yet to show, and hope Byram can become a defensively sound player that he has yet to show.
The gap between last season and reaching the playoffs this season has to be covered by internal improvement off-setting the loss of a top-6 C and LW, Ruff and a better 4th line. That's a lot of hope.
This is logical take if we talking odds for the teams that aEven at full strength, the C depth is really shaky. TT and Cozens will have to stay healthy AND improve at both ends. Without that, any slump they go through will have no option to fall back on. McLeod/Krebs barely cuts it for two bottom-6 Cs, and I'm not sure they actually cut it. Quinn/Peterka have to step up to offset the loss of Skinner's production, because Zucker won't be doing that. So that's a net-zero gain too. Then on D we're hoping Jokiharju finds another gear he has yet to show, and hope Byram can become a defensively sound player that he has yet to show.
The gap between last season and reaching the playoffs this season has to be covered by internal improvement off-setting the loss of a top-6 C and LW, Ruff and a better 4th line. That's a lot of hope.
The top 9 F lsst yr scored 165 goals.Even at full strength, the C depth is really shaky. TT and Cozens will have to stay healthy AND improve at both ends. Without that, any slump they go through will have no option to fall back on. McLeod/Krebs barely cuts it for two bottom-6 Cs, and I'm not sure they actually cut it. Quinn/Peterka have to step up to offset the loss of Skinner's production, because Zucker won't be doing that. So that's a net-zero gain too. Then on D we're hoping Jokiharju finds another gear he has yet to show, and hope Byram can become a defensively sound player that he has yet to show.
The gap between last season and reaching the playoffs this season has to be covered by internal improvement off-setting the loss of a top-6 C and LW, Ruff and a better 4th line. That's a lot of hope.
I agree he should have been in the AHL, probably would have been better for his developmentKrebs deal is basically what most predicted.
Still a small chance Krebs blossoms into something.
But currently he seems too small and slow to play in our bottom 6, and not enough skill or speed for the top 6. He’s a guy who just kinda takes up space. Has never truly earned his spot on the roster in 3 years here.
It appears to me that Kulich is our seventh top-six forward, while Krebs is slotting in as our seventh bottom-six forward. If that means Kulich plays in Rochester (because he's waiver exempt) and only appears when/if there's an opening in the top six, I think you should have your 13 forwards right there.Not as a 4th liner or pressboxer.
Yeah if Zucker can still play and McLeod fills 3C that line can be an upgrade. I think I was posting with the puke still in my mouth when I read that Krebs was penciled in at 3C. Hopefully McLeod and Lafferty get much more ice time as the bottom-6 Cs.I'd argue they'll have a better 3rd line as well. They haven't been able to ice a legit 3rd line at any point over the last 10 years, no joke. It's always been littered with the leftovers on the roster. I suppose at one point it was Benson Mitts and Greenway. However, due to other injuries in the top 6 (Quinn), they became a defacto top 6 line.
This year they should have a third line that has some defensive chops, an identity and some modicum of skill. I'd say Zucker (or Benson)-McLeod-Greenway is a rock solid third line that could play against other teams top players and still have a chance to score/win the possession game.
A lot will depend on which, if any prospects make the opening night roster. I'd say Kulich has the most legit shot, with Rosen with an outside chance. That could shake up the top 9 a fair bit and knock a guy like Greenway down to the 4th line, which would be a good problem to have. Let's admit it, he'd be the best player on that line. Kulich could potentially play Center and shift Cozens to the wing, which I think the organization should be looking at eventually.
Most likely though, Kulich is in Rochester and our top 13 forward group is pretty much set. Center depth is definitely a problem that started the moment they traded Mitts. They badly need someone to step up at Center ice to either replace Cozens or at least be there in case of injury. The same could be said at top 6 winger. This team is relying on A LOT going right this year to even have a chance at the playoffs.
Wow how do you see through such deeply rose colored shades?The top 9 F lsst yr scored 165 goals.
I see top 9 getting 200
thompson 35
quinn 28
Peterka 25
benson 20
Tuch 30
Cozens 28
3C /Zucker /Greenway/other 40
They traded Mitts for D
Skinner bought out
Zucker= mitts goals
Skinner loss made up by many.
Krebs is an NHL player. He's not bad for what he's being paid, and where he's slotted in the the lineup. He's a disappointment if you expected him be a second line center, but once you drop that he's fine for where he is and should help the team. He's still young, and he has room to grow.Yeah if Zucker can still play and McLeod fills 3C that line can be an upgrade. I think I was posting with the puke still in my mouth when I read that Krebs was penciled in at 3C. Hopefully McLeod and Lafferty get much more ice time as the bottom-6 Cs.
Wow how do you see through such deeply rose colored shades?
I agree. How I think they will run the forwards and call-ups. Say if Greenway is banged up and misses a few games. Malenstyn/Lafferty may get bumped up to play with McLeod and Zucker, while Krebs plays with Aube-Kubel and the other.It appears to me that Kulich is our seventh top-six forward, while Krebs is slotting in as our seventh bottom-six forward. If that means Kulich plays in Rochester (because he's waiver exempt) and only appears when/if there's an opening in the top six, I think you should have your 13 forwards right there.
2nd line winger we were looking for. Right?Not as a 4th liner or pressboxer.
Not a big fan of his posts but I don’t think those numbers are crazy at allWow how do you see through such deeply rose colored shades?
Thats not quite true. They had a pretty good one at the start of last season with Benson/Mitts/Greenway. It would have been fun to see how they would have developed throughout the season. But unfortunately the top 6 was playing like complete ass. So they were broken up and spread among the top 3 lines to get those guys going.I'd argue they'll have a better 3rd line as well. They haven't been able to ice a legit 3rd line at any point over the last 10 years, no joke. It's always been littered with the leftovers on the roster. I suppose at one point it was Benson Mitts and Greenway. However, due to other injuries in the top 6 (Quinn), they became a defacto top 6 line.
This year they should have a third line that has some defensive chops, an identity and some modicum of skill. I'd say Zucker (or Benson)-McLeod-Greenway is a rock solid third line that could play against other teams top players and still have a chance to score/win the possession game.
A lot will depend on which, if any prospects make the opening night roster. I'd say Kulich has the most legit shot, with Rosen with an outside chance. That could shake up the top 9 a fair bit and knock a guy like Greenway down to the 4th line, which would be a good problem to have. Let's admit it, he'd be the best player on that line. Kulich could potentially play Center and shift Cozens to the wing, which I think the organization should be looking at eventually.
Most likely though, Kulich is in Rochester and our top 13 forward group is pretty much set. Center depth is definitely a problem that started the moment they traded Mitts. They badly need someone to step up at Center ice to either replace Cozens or at least be there in case of injury. The same could be said at top 6 winger. This team is relying on A LOT going right this year to even have a chance at the playoffs.
Thompson-40The top 9 F lsst yr scored 165 goals.
I see top 9 getting 200
thompson 35
quinn 28
Peterka 25
benson 20
Tuch 30
Cozens 28
3C /Zucker /Greenway/other 40
They traded Mitts for D
Skinner bought out
Zucker= mitts goals
Skinner loss made up by many.
Coleman & Andersson would be great adds.
He also reported that Adams wasn’t budging from his original offers, and it was Krebs who ultimately folded and took the deal on the table.Friedman says in 32T today that he’s not convinced the Sabres are going to sit on the cap room. Also heard Krebs may be traded before he signed.
Bit of a shocker - assume this means he’s at least heard of them peaking around.
I tend to agree, but it would largely depend on their NTCs. Andersson has a 6 team NTC, which could just be the other canadian teams, but Coleman has a 10 team approved trade list, essentially a 22 team NTC, which almost certainly includes us unless he has some personal ties to the org.
Ruff was hired the season after Coleman was traded from NJ to Tampa, so nothing there.
The reality of it is....if we don't start winning consistently, we are never going to get off of this NMC/NTCs. Nobody wants to go to a chronic loser team. They certainly don't want to go to a high tax, worse weather, rust belt city loser team.
We will also be on some NTCs, but at least if players felt they could win here, it'd at least give players second thought when we came calling.
I was thinking of Krebs and some other pieces for Perfetti.Friedman says in 32T today that he’s not convinced the Sabres are going to sit on the cap room. Also heard Krebs may be traded before he signed.
Bit of a shocker - assume this means he’s at least heard of them peaking around.
Wow how do you see through such deeply rose colored shades?
Friedman says in 32T today that he’s not convinced the Sabres are going to sit on the cap room. Also heard Krebs may be traded before he signed.
Bit of a shocker - assume this means he’s at least heard of them peaking around.