Kyle McMahon
Registered User
- May 10, 2006
- 13,463
- 4,650
I think this an important point. The HOF standards have simply never been very lofty. Even serious and level-headed fans of the game who are simply not overtly history-minded would be surprised by some of the guys who are in there. In my experience, a "Hall of Famer" in the minds of many fans is a guy who was one of the absolute best in the game for a number of years, and if he wasn't, he better have been pretty damn good while winning Cup(s) and hit some big career statistical milestones. This kind of fan (which is fairly typical, I think), just doesn't really know about all the Hall of Famers from previous eras that fell well short of the benchmark they've set in their own mind.It's honestly a bit jaw-dropping to me.
Especially the Sedins. Like, these guys are absolute slam-dunk HHOFers. There shouldn't have been an argument in the world. They're 1000+ point one-team guys with MVPs/scoring titles/Pearsons who are the most important players in the history of a franchise and as people were amongst the biggest class acts in NHL history. These aren't fringe candidates. These are solidly mid-level HHOFers. There is nobody in the history of the sport with similar careers (one-team players with big career numbers and an MVP-level peak) who didn't cakewalk into the HHOF.
I don't know if the East Coast was asleep and missed their entire careers? Or it's lingering anti-Canuck bias from 2011? Or if this strange need to bully and ridicule them that they seem to bring out in people didn't die with their retirement? Or if people just don't understand where the HHOF standards sit. But it's ridiculous.
You can probably find 10-15 year old posts of mine criticizing inductions like Mats Sundin, laughing off the idea that Mark Recchi was a future HOFer, or wondering what Larry Murphy ever did to warrant consideration. Because in my mind, the Hall of Fame was for guys like Sakic, Lidstrom, and Brodeur, and most of the inductees from before my time must also have been that good, or close to it. Eventually I came to realize that, no, guys like Bill Barber, Eddie Giacomin, and Leo Boivin were definitely not that good, and that probably half the guys ever inducted into the HOF would not have struck me as such had I actually witnessed them during their careers.
I'm sure in another 30 years when Sedin-level players are being inducted, people will criticize those guys as not measuring up to the HOF "standard" set by Kane, Malkin, and Hedman. They'll be largely unaware of players like Andreychuk, Zubov, and Carbonneau, or just assume that they were greater than they really were.