- Dec 12, 2017
- 26,031
- 12,471
The Jays (might) have to win 6 in a row, 3 this weekend, 2 play in games, and the WC game for the chance to play Tampa in the ALDS.
Sign me up.
Sign me up.
The Red Sox went 14-12 against the Mariners and Blue Jays, while the Mariners went 7-6 against the Red Sox and Blue Jays. Those are identical winning percentages, so the Red Sox win out by virtue of their 4-3 showing against Seattle and get to choose an A, B or C designation first. The Mariners choose next, and the Blue Jays get whatever is left over.”
It’d be fun.This is the real fun A/B/C scenario (unlike the lame 2 WC one)
Game 1: B at A
Game 2: C at Winner A/B
Based on how this is going to work (TB1 Monday, TB2 Tuesday, WC Wednesday, ALDS Thursday), I have to think Boston takes C to get a day off for the Tuesday game...but then they risk having to fly to Seattle for one game and then right back to New York.
If that's the case, our flight path to the playoffs will look like Toronto -> Seattle -> Toronto -> New York -> Tampa Bay on consecutive days (featuring Steven Matz in the WC game).
The1984 Tigers started the season 35-5 and played .500 for the remaining 142 games and still won enough to win the division, going .500 for most of the season and relying on their great start is a bad way to finish the season, did they deserve to make the playoffs? Of course they did.Maybe just my thinking, but when we go out the way they did, you shouldn't be in the playoffs.
This only works when you have a bullpen that you actually trust.
Even last night for all the complaining I saw on Twitter etc about Ray facing the Yankees a third time...much rather go down with him than trying to cobble together four innings out of this tired bullpen.
Yes, absolutely. We couldn't do it this year due to the pen. Hopefully we concentrate on the pen in the offseason.
Didn't they make it a priority last offseason too?
Yes, absolutely. We couldn't do it this year due to the pen. Hopefully we concentrate on the pen in the offseason.
Not based on payroll allocation - we have one of the lowest % BP spend in the league (and that includes the IL guys).
It's not really fair for me to use the benefit of hindsight...but had we signed Liam Hendricks instead of Yates, we'd be comfortably in the first wildcard spot right now.
it ain't over.
we could be back in a playoff position as soon as..... tonight.
I mean... spending an extra $13 million in any one area would probably make a pretty significant difference, wouldn't it?
Maybe, but the Yankees finish you off if you make it in
Maybe, but the Yankees finish you off if you make it in
$7.5m (remove Yates contract).
That won't even buy you a slightly used Roark![]()
Maybe, but the Yankees finish you off if you make it in
I forgot about the weirdness of Hendriks's option and just looked at it as 3/54 rather than the 4/54 it really is. You win this round.
I stand by the overall point, though... unless they were adding payroll (and Rogers sucks, so I'm doubtful on that) then I don't know where that money was coming from.
I mean the Jays aren’t out of it yet even though winning last night would’ve been soooo much better. Red Sox lost 2 of 3 to Baltimore which certainly kept us in it. Now we gotta sweep Baltimore (doable considering they’re the worst team) but man it would’ve looked a lot better if that horrendous 6th inning never occurred
How does that saying go - penny wise, pound foolish I think? You try to save money on a big problem by patching it up and eventually you end up wasting more effort/time/money than you would if you just paid the price initially..
Liam Hendricks salary this year: $11m
Yates: $5.5, Chatwood $3m. Once those 2 busted, we had to bring in Hand and promptly dispose of him after he cost us I think 2 games. Cost us another $2m. Then we pivot to 37-year old Soria, costs us another $1.2 mil for the privilege of seeing his 8 innings here with a tidy ERA of 7.88...
Total expenditure for that poo-poo platter of trash: $12 mil, and probably 5 games lost in the standings.
How does that saying go - penny wise, pound foolish I think? You try to save money on a big problem by patching it up and eventually you end up wasting more effort/time/money than you would if you just paid the price initially..
Liam Hendricks salary this year: $11m
Yates: $5.5, Chatwood $3m. Once those 2 busted, we had to bring in Hand and promptly dispose of him after he cost us I think 2 games. Cost us another $2m. Then we pivot to 37-year old Soria, costs us another $1.2 mil for the privilege of seeing his 8 innings here with a tidy ERA of 7.88...
Total expenditure for that poo-poo platter of trash: $12 mil, and probably 5 games lost in the standings.