Mtl had to pay his ticket.Dorion has been at like 2-3 of the Habs last 5-6 games and they have been confirmed to be talking trade. Toffoli, Lehkonen, and Anderson all make some degree of sense.
Mtl had to pay his ticket.Dorion has been at like 2-3 of the Habs last 5-6 games and they have been confirmed to be talking trade. Toffoli, Lehkonen, and Anderson all make some degree of sense.
What would your ask be? I feel like NYR kinda wants the same thing in a trade - guys who can play. Main difference being Ottawa would be able to add a more high-paid player.
Only deal that makes some sense to me would be Paul + (probably one of our 2nds) for Kravtsov assuming Paul isn't going to re-sign... but I can't really see it coming to that and, if Paul will re-sign, it would be a tough move to justify.
2nd+Paul? For a 22 year old who hasnt performed in the NHL and has skipped town once already for the KHL? Yikes as a Sens fan I wouldn't do that. And I feel pretty confident Melnyk wouldn't take that risk either.
No way are Connor Brown, Paul or Brannstrom available. All three are cost-effective and very solid players that Ottawa will retain to push for Playoffs next season.
Besides retaining a pile of salary what would a Murray deal look like? I know he's having a decent comeback but who would be interested?
Melnyk has nothing to do with it. If Paul is gonna walk, I'd much rather tack a 2nd onto him and get Kravtsov than add another 2nd via trade.
Kravtsov chose the KHL over the AHL and was clearly dissatisfied with the Rangers in general. We went through this exact same thing with Puljuarvi, people telling me I was crazy for how much I'd pay for him and now what I was willing to pay wouldn't even sniff him.
I have no doubt Kravtsov will be a good top 9 winger and he has upside to be a good deal more. Big, fast, skilled, smart player.
Melnyk has nothing to do with it. If Paul is gonna walk, I'd much rather tack a 2nd onto him and get Kravtsov than add another 2nd via trade.
Kravtsov chose the KHL over the AHL and was clearly dissatisfied with the Rangers in general. We went through this exact same thing with Puljuarvi, people telling me I was crazy for how much I'd pay for him and now what I was willing to pay wouldn't even sniff him.
I have no doubt Kravtsov will be a good top 9 winger and he has upside to be a good deal more. Big, fast, skilled, smart player.
I really think you are living in a complete fantasy world with this take. Did Chabot and Tkachuk take discounts? Murray?Clearly we disagree on several points here. But I'll just say one thing. Melnyk has everything to do with it. Its his team he has to greenlight pretty much any transaction. And is he going to want to take a risk on a guy who has shown an unwillingness to work with an NHL team? Especially when hes the guy who demands his players take discounts to stay? I wouldn't imagine.
On a quick scan there are 4 teams that could be looking for a potential starting goalie next year (im sure a fan of the team will jump in and say im wrong haha)
1. Chicago Blackhawks
2. Buffalo Sabres
3. Arizona Coyotes
4. San Jose Sharks
and again just quick spitballing as to what could work (more likely an offseason move)
Murray+2nd/3rd round pick for Lablanc
Murray for Tyler Johnson (blackhawks might need to add a pick if Murray keeps playing like he has been recently)
I really think you are living in a complete fantasy world with this take. Did Chabot and Tkachuk take discounts? Murray?
Melnyk has to greenlight contracts, there is no way he's stepping in to kibosh a trade for a prospect, especially not on the basis you've laid out. I don't think you will find many people who think what you're saying makes any sense.
If Murray keeps playing like he has been recently, why on earth would we trade him?
And I appreciate the answer - thanks!We most likely would, was just answering the question that was asked thats all
I really think you are living in a complete fantasy world with this take. Did Chabot and Tkachuk take discounts? Murray?
Melnyk has to greenlight contracts, there is no way he's stepping in to kibosh a trade for a prospect, especially not on the basis you've laid out. I don't think you will find many people who think what you're saying makes any sense.
Dont think that's why Stone left but, either way, its irrelevant when discussing a guy on an ELC with no arbitration rights upon expiry.And I think your living in a fantasy world for thinking we'd ever give up Nick Paul and a 2nd for a flight risk. So I guess we are even haha.
For every contract you say didnt take a hometown discount I can offer you one who was asked too and left. Stone? Duclair? Alfredsson?
What would your ask be? I feel like NYR kinda wants the same thing in a trade - guys who can play. Main difference being Ottawa would be able to add a more high-paid player.
Only deal that makes some sense to me would be Paul + (probably one of our 2nds) for Kravtsov assuming Paul isn't going to re-sign... but I can't really see it coming to that and, if Paul will re-sign, it would be a tough move to justify.
That doesn't mean he won't find other ways to be Eugene Melnyk. This guy would pay his players with food stamps if he could.
No thanks then. I'd rather let Kravtsov rot. At the draft, if there's a player we like and need the pick, maybe it makes sense, but not now.
I don't think the sens would be looking to retain. We care about cash, not cap. If they do it, I think it would be another overpaid player coming back and maybe B-level picks or prospects to even it out.Besides retaining a pile of salary what would a Murray deal look like? I know he's having a decent comeback but who would be interested?
That doesn't mean he won't find other ways to be Eugene Melnyk. This guy would pay his players with food stamps if he could.
I've got to assume teams are clling about Brown, Paul, Brannstrom and zub
Guys like Ennis, Gaudette and Sanford also probably have some value.
We'll barely hit the cap floor! Woot woot!
Wouldn't mind adding Paul as a depth player at the deadline
They will try to sign Paul, but if it's clear they wont be able they will trade him otherwise he is staying put I think.
What do you guys think Nick Paul would cost at the deadline (assuming he hasn't extended before then)?Paul it would really depend on what he wants as an extension. Do i want him back yes. But there is a pretty decent chance that he ends up on 4th line to start the year next year. Do we really want to pay 3 million for a 4th liner, especially a team that is tight on cap. (Brady/Norris/Bath/Jimmy/C.Brown/Formenton as players for sure over him) (White/Pinto/Internal depth as potentially over him)
Ottawa is loaded with young players and prospects. I think they are ready to take the next step if they add a couple key veterans.
I think they would be a good target for a player like Scheifele.
What do you guys think Nick Paul would cost at the deadline (assuming he hasn't extended before then)?