Star Ocean
Registered User
- Dec 30, 2018
- 3,583
- 2,003
Hagelin has already said he'll decline if asked to due to having no contract.Worst case scenario. All major players declines and grönborg adds päärjävi hagelin and lander.
Eeeeh, I'm not disagreeing with you. But I don't see splitting up the scoring as a bad thing here. Also I wouldn't compare Lindblom with Bratt since they're completly different players with different roles. I don't have anything against playing Bratt with either Nylander or Pettersson.I don’t know why everybody keeps sleeping on Bratt, right now he is a way better player than Lindblom and Olofsson and we do not have enough talent there to try and split the scoring up so why so few people have him in the top 6 baffles me.
The problem here is if we try to split up the scoring we’re going to hamper the few talented ones we have. Plus Olofsson shouldn’t play at all if he goes outside of the pp he should be an extra forward.Eeeeh, I'm not disagreeing with you. But I don't see splitting up the scoring as a bad thing here. Also I wouldn't compare Lindblom with Bratt since they're completly different players with different roles. I don't have anything against playing Bratt with either Nylander or Pettersson.
There isn't too many big additions remaining to be added to the team. I'm thinking Grönborg should give Victor Olofsson a call. Also, I normally wouldn't consider it but I could also see Alex Nylander be given a chance here if guys like Bäckström and Järnkrok says no. If nothing else it would've been fun to give more young guys the opportunity. I could see Alex Nylander and Bratt on a line since they've had chemistry before and know each other well. I think it could also spice up a second PP. But I think it's a very low chance of it happening and I can't say I'm sure adding Alex would really make the team stronger.
Lines could look something like this (assuming William Nylander comes):
Hörnqvist - Pettersson - Lindholm
Lindblom - W Nylander - Olofsson
Bratt - Krüger - A Nylander
Eriksson - A Kempe - M Kempe
Worst case scenario. All major players declines and grönborg adds päärjävi hagelin and lander.
Jacob Josefsson is a top player in the SHL. Says it all really.
I kinda want Larsson with OEL, they had such great chemistry last year. I do get what you’re saying though.Erik Gustafsson from CHI is bad in his own zon. He needs a very good defence player with him. I think Adam Larsson would be good for him.
Ekholm is better in all three zones than Larsson.Erik Gustafsson from CHI is bad in his own zon. He needs a very good defence player with him. I think Adam Larsson would be good for him.
Larsson was the only point of solidity in 2016 and was hands down the best defenseman at the worlds last year. He has a history of coming up HUGE for Sweden.Ekholm is better in all three zones than Larsson.
Such an important addition to the defense. Not only is Ekholm a great defenseman, our depth becomes so much better. Skilled defensemen are so important, especially in Sweden's puck moving game plan. As expected, Nylander wanted redemption for his tough season and that's nice to hear. This team is forming up to look quite solid in time for the WHC to start.Ekholm is in. We will rely heavy on our defense as usual.
Calgary’s fans seem to wanna put him in Monahans centerspot as soon as next season. Peters has also said he seems him as a center going forward.Lindholm should be RW. He comes from his best NHL season, as a RW. We know he is elite when he is RW, as a C he might be worse.
I didn't put that much thought in to this. It was more about Olofsson and A Nylanders to be or not to be in the lineup. But Krüger is a solid C. Not all 3 on a line have to be offensive, it's also a balance i believe. Krüger is great defensively, great at faceoffs and underrated offensively. But again, not my main focus with my post.you should switch A.Kempe and Kruger. Kempe is much better offensively than kruger. Kempe had 8 points in 10 wc games.