BigBadBoar
Registered User
Watching the Kunlun - Khabarovsk game. Kunlun players are quite competent skaters, but most of the lack physicality. They are generally unable to use their body even in the defensive play in their own zone.
Watching the Kunlun - Khabarovsk game. Kunlun players are quite competent skaters, but most of the lack physicality. They are generally unable to use their body even in the defensive play in their own zone.
With China apparently determined to take part in the men's tournament, the IIHF Council confirmed earlier this month it would not seek to block the hosts from competing.
IIHF president Luc Tardif backtracked on Tuesday saying that China's participation would hinge on player eligibility rules and the play of the Kunlun Red Star, a China-based team stocked with Olympic hopefuls competing in Russia's Kontinental Hockey League (KHL).
"On this we are onboard with IOC," said Tardif, after speaking at the Primetime Sport management conference in Toronto. "I didn't want to do a diplomatic earthquake alone just coming as the new president so we wanted to make sure we are on the same line with the IOC and that's the case.
"It will be our (eligibility) rules and when I say our that's IOC and IIHF.
"Norway is ready."
IIHF will make its final decision on China's (or Norway's) participation on 25 November 2021, according to CTV.
Účast Číny na ZOH v ohrožení? Rozhodnout se má příští týden | Hokej.cz - web českého hokeje
Decision on China's participation in Olympic men's hockey set for Nov. 25
With Norway, the tournament would definitely be more fair in the sense that the other teams which are in the group with China (CAN, USA, GER) wouldn't just improve their overall score by devastating China (if they did, it would give them a huge advantage for the playoffs seeding).
You really think that Norway would do better than a team playing in KHL?
KRS might get blanked 10-0; is that really much worse than Norway getting canned 8-0?
Norway in a generational change is still a better hockey country than China.
You really think that Norway would do better than a team playing in KHL?
That is exactly the confusion I have about why they are even bothering to reevaluate. Are they deciding whether they should be opening the can of worms and fiddling with eligibility rules and potentially permanently changing nation eligibility for international hockey? If so, that's the angle they should be approaching this. Nevermind how KRS is performing in the KHL and these sample games, but they should be having discussions with the Chinese federation on whether these players should be on the national team and whether they have any future there after this tournament.
If it's only about on ice performance for KRS or Norway the difference is immaterial and totally asinine to even consider it on that merit. Basically little gain but plenty of cons; egg on the face of the hosts, definitely greater loss of potential growth of sport no matter how people try to claim 1.4 billion aren't interested (it will almost certainly exceed the % of the 5.3 million of Norway that are interested - 1 in a thousand people in China tuning in would exceed a quarter of Norway caring) and potentially... greater rationale for the NHL to pull out their players should they want to.
KRS might get blanked 10-0; is that really much worse than Norway getting canned 8-0?
China's restrictive nationality rules largely prevent them from pursuing players with dual citizenship.
It might look like the domination that could get that bad, but I'd be surprised if it does.If China has to play without dual-citizens that will be something awful to watch. 50-0 or so.
Even if their opponents stop to play out of pure pitty it would still be awful to watch. At the same time, every team would reach double digits just out of pure boredom. They have no incentive to run up the score but they also have no incentive to save China's face.It might look like the domination that could get that bad, but I'd be surprised if it does.
I don't disagree that the scores would very likely reach double digits, but I think to suggest 50-0 is unreasonable.Even if their opponents stop to play out of pure pitty it would still be awful to watch. At the same time, every team would reach double digits just out of pure boredom. They have no incentive to run up the score but they also have no incentive to save China's face.
I don't disagree that the scores would very likely reach double digits, but I think to suggest 50-0 is unreasonable.
That being said, I don't think we'll see that scenario, as I do believe pretty confidently that the majority of the Kunlun team will be there. In that case, I don't see that roster being significantly weaker than other teams that have been at past Olympics.
Wouldn't be so sure when NHL super stars face pure amateurs. Slovakia's women team won 82-0 over Bulgaria with 139 shots on goal.
Slovakia beats Bulgaria 82-0 in women's hockey
Agreed and I really hope this to happen. KHL team vs NHL stacked national team isn't that big gap as it would be with amateurs.
China's restrictive nationality rules largely prevent them from pursuing players with dual citizenship.
There's no such thing as rule of law in China, handing out passports to these athletes won't be an issue after it has been approved by the relevant Communist Party organs. Nationality law that exists on paper could be used to deny the passports after the Olympics once the players have outlived their usefulness, however.
You really think the highest possible level athletes aren't going to do anything in their power to be at the top of the group, even if it's a very slim chance it comes to goal differential against China?And no, teams do not have much incentive to beat up on China to improve their goal difference for tie breakers.
The goal differential against China will not determine which team finishes first in the group. It's not a very slim chance, it simply is not a chance at all.You really think the highest possible level athletes aren't going to do anything in their power to be at the top of the group, even if it's a very slim chance it comes to goal differential against China?
If they don't, then they don't deserve to be at the Olympics.