OldGreatWestern
Registered User
- Aug 27, 2008
- 509
- 11
This is roughly what I'm predicting as well.Huberdeau – McDavid – Mackinnon
Marchand – Crosby – Bergeron
Stamkos – Point – Marner
O’Reilly – Couturier – Stone
Scheifele / Tavares
That is what I see the forwards looking like. Those exact 13 players.Huberdeau - McDavid - Stone
Point - MacKinnon - Marner
Bergeron - Crosby Marchand
Scheifele - O’Reilly - Couturier
Stamkos
Theadore - Ekblad
Girard - Makar
Nurse - Doughty
Chabot
Fleury
Blackwood
Binnington
That is what I see the forwards looking like. Those exact 13 players.
I think that defense is too young though. Plus, Pietrangelo is a lock. I can't see any scenario where he doesn't make the team, unless he is injured.
For goaltender's, I have always maintained and will continue to maintain that Price will make the team. He is the proven international goalie for Canada. If you take him and he stinks in the first game, then you can move off him. But he will get picked and be given the chance to lose the starting job, the same way Brodeur was in 2010. I won't believe he doesn't the team until I see it happen.
I don’t think Price makes it in his current form. He’s not playing well enough. We shouldn’t bring on old dogs, he was well respected by Hockey Canada, no need.
Canada has lots of goalies that are easily capable of winning a gold. They don’t need to be total game breakers, they need to be dependable. MAF wins a lot of games with Vegas, and Team Canada will be equivalent to Vegas on steroids. Pick the best goalies.
I don’t think Price makes it in his current form. He’s not playing well enough. We shouldn’t bring on old dogs, he was well respected by Hockey Canada, no need.
Canada has lots of goalies that are easily capable of winning a gold. They don’t need to be total game breakers, they need to be dependable. MAF wins a lot of games with Vegas, and Team Canada will be equivalent to Vegas on steroids. Pick the best goalies.
Old dogs? MAF is 3 years older than Price. Canada's goaltending situation is crap, you take whoever's the hottest going in and hope for the best.
You're probably right about the handedness. I don't remember anyone ever talking about it (or about faceoff handedness), so I presumed it was a Babcock thing. Shows how attentive to detail these high-level coaches are. Our thoughts are aligned on Huberdeau, as they are with Stamkos lining up on the left side - I like the idea of him playing on his wrong side, with a better shooting angle at the net. The guy catches some criticism for not being quite the same player as he used to be, but he's still very good, very good at faceoffs (Schiefele is weak on the dot), and still Canada's best pure triggerman. Would you propose matching up the Crosby line against the opposition's top scoring line (like the Toews lines in Vancouver and Sochi)? That's how I would play it. McDavid/MacKinnon would draw the checkers, the Crosby line would be the matchup line, and this in theory would provide favourable matchups for Scheifele (likely) and Couturier (almost definitely) to take advantage of.
Old dogs? MAF is 3 years older than Price. Canada's goaltending situation is crap, you take whoever's the hottest going in and hope for the best.
Fleury has been playing very well this season.
But let's not forget that he was starting to fall off a cliff a year ago, and is 36 years old now. Things were starting to deteriorate so fast for Fleury that he had lost his starting job with Vegas, and he was a candidate for "our player for a 7th round pick" type of deal just so Vegas could get rid of his salary-cap hit. If any team in the NHL was willing to absorb his salary cap hit, then he wouldn't be with Vegas now. I am sure Vegas would have rather traded Fleury rather than Schmidt when trying to make room for Pietrangelo.
This season might be a late career rebound, or it might also be his last gasp as an effective goaltender.
It isn't out of the realm of possibility that he declines very hard between now and 9-10 months from now when the team is picked.
That sucks, he was playing well.I doubt Ekblad is back for next year, cross him off the list
D NURSE | D DOUGHTY |
S THEODORE | C MAKAR |
T CHABOT | S WEBER |
S GIRARD | D HAMILTON |
Maybe I'm crazy, and, as much as I hate him, I think I'd rather have Tom Wilson on my 4th line than someone like Scheifele/Tavares/Stamkos. The USA team has some tough/annoying players, so I'm worried we don't have a response to them.
There’s more to the tournament than playing the USA, Tom Wilson would get baited so easily by European players who are known to embellishMaybe I'm crazy, and, as much as I hate him, I think I'd rather have Tom Wilson on my 4th line than someone like Scheifele/Tavares/Stamkos. The USA team has some tough/annoying players, so I'm worried we don't have a response to them.
Maybe I'm crazy, and, as much as I hate him, I think I'd rather have Tom Wilson on my 4th line than someone like Scheifele/Tavares/Stamkos. The USA team has some tough/annoying players, so I'm worried we don't have a response to them.
Maybe I'm crazy, and, as much as I hate him, I think I'd rather have Tom Wilson on my 4th line than someone like Scheifele/Tavares/Stamkos. The USA team has some tough/annoying players, so I'm worried we don't have a response to them.
Barzals, Points and Marners would easily be chosen over Tom f***ing Wilson.If all we had were Barzals and Points and Marners, he might have a place on the team. But when you bring Stone and O’Reilly and Coutier and Nurse you don’t really have to worry.
Rather hilariously to illustrate your point Barzal gassed Wilson and the entire team last nightBarzals, Points and Marners would easily be chosen over Tom f***ing Wilson.
Of course, but I think the person I was quoting was arguing that the team will have no sand paper and will get pushed around.Barzals, Points and Marners would easily be chosen over Tom f***ing Wilson.