Back in 2012, Tampa signed Hedman to a four year, 4M AAV deal.This makes absolutely no sense. Unless he's hoping to sign for 8+ on his next deal.
Expect that loophole to be scrutinized.....
Back in 2012, Tampa signed Hedman to a four year, 4M AAV deal.
This deal is extremely reminiscent to that. Yzerman somehow convinced Kucherov to take less money, with the promise of a big boy pay day at the end of it (see Hedman's new contract for comparison).
Back in 2012, Tampa signed Hedman to a four year, 4M AAV deal.
This deal is extremely reminiscent to that. Yzerman somehow convinced Kucherov to take less money, with the promise of a big boy pay day at the end of it (see Hedman's new contract for comparison).
But... hurricanes..
It's not a loophole. It's the law. Not sure how you expect that to be changed by the NHL. It's also been the law for the entire cap era so why are people acting like it's a new thing ?
A huge advantage indeed. And an unfair one at that.
Except that they only play half their games in Florida. The other half are out of state and they need to pay the state income tax wherever else they're playing.
It ends up being a relatively insignificant difference in the end. Otherwise why would anyone sign in California? Or New York?
No, but for comparison's sake, he was the second leading defender in scoring on the team at the time. The first was that guy named Carle, who got the 5.5M AAV deal in 2012 that haunted Tampa for years.Seems to me Kuch is much more highly regarded now than VH was in 2012. Was VH slated to make $6 and signed for $4? I get wanting to pat Stevie on the back, but this seems like a reach.
Still an RFA at the end?
It's not a loophole. It's the law. Not sure how you expect that to be changed by the NHL.
Wow, amazing deal for the Lightening, granted, they probably lose him in 4 years when he hits UFA or are going to have shell out big bucks. But that is the consequences of the salary cap, but they have an amazing 3 year window. Regret not taking him earlier in my fantasy draft.
Does this mean Point goes down?
Nobody cared when TB wasn't spending to the cap.
Is it an advantage? Definitely. The weather's not bad either.
Tell that to the Orlando area right now. Seems Florida is always getting some sort of natural disaster...Nobody cared when TB wasn't spending to the cap.
Is it an advantage? Definitely. The weather's not bad either.
It's not a loophole. It's the law. Not sure how you expect that to be changed by the NHL. It's also been the law for the entire cap era so why are people acting like it's a new thing ?
RFA with arbitration rights, so he's going to have ALL the leverage in 2019.
Still a great contract for Yzerman, but NK is going to get his money. It just might be from someone else in 2020.
The advantage is the player clears more than his peers on the same contract value. Nobody is acting like it's a new thing, but when teams play this advantage and sign players to outrageously undermarket deals start happening people start to complain about unfair playing fields and 7% of the salary cap (or whatever the average difference is around the league) is significant.
Simple accounting can easily recognize the % advantage and level this for all teams without impacting the tax laws or the players pay.
I'm just saying I bet it will be a point of discussion by the league, with some wanting the playing field leveled.