Confirmed Signing with Link: [TBL] Lightning re-sign Nikita Kucherov (3 years, $4.766M AAV)

Firsov99

Registered User
Feb 17, 2006
5,063
3,871
It's hard to believe this contract. There has to be a catch to all of this. Unreal.
 

Hictor Vedman*

Unregistered Hedman
Sep 30, 2014
2,244
1
Ottawa
This makes absolutely no sense. Unless he's hoping to sign for 8+ on his next deal.
Back in 2012, Tampa signed Hedman to a four year, 4M AAV deal.

This deal is extremely reminiscent to that. Yzerman somehow convinced Kucherov to take less money, with the promise of a big boy pay day at the end of it (see Hedman's new contract for comparison).
 

Firsov99

Registered User
Feb 17, 2006
5,063
3,871
Back in 2012, Tampa signed Hedman to a four year, 4M AAV deal.

This deal is extremely reminiscent to that. Yzerman somehow convinced Kucherov to take less money, with the promise of a big boy pay day at the end of it (see Hedman's new contract for comparison).

If the "the promise of a big boy pay day" is not on paper, then it's worthless. What if Kucherov gets injured before that day comes? This deal favors Tampa tremendously. Good for the team of course.
 

CapitalsCupReality

It’s Go Time!!
Feb 27, 2002
66,290
21,270
Back in 2012, Tampa signed Hedman to a four year, 4M AAV deal.

This deal is extremely reminiscent to that. Yzerman somehow convinced Kucherov to take less money, with the promise of a big boy pay day at the end of it (see Hedman's new contract for comparison).

Seems to me Kuch is much more highly regarded now than VH was in 2012. Was VH slated to make $6 and signed for $4? I get wanting to pat Stevie on the back, but this seems like a reach.
 

DFC

Registered User
Sep 26, 2013
47,906
24,239
NB
It's not a loophole. It's the law. Not sure how you expect that to be changed by the NHL. It's also been the law for the entire cap era so why are people acting like it's a new thing ?

Nobody cared when TB wasn't spending to the cap.

Is it an advantage? Definitely. The weather's not bad either.
 

Caeldan

Whippet Whisperer
Jun 21, 2008
15,459
1,046
A huge advantage indeed. And an unfair one at that.

Except that they only play half their games in Florida. The other half are out of state and they need to pay the state income tax wherever else they're playing.

It ends up being a relatively insignificant difference in the end. Otherwise why would anyone sign in California? Or New York?
 

CupsOverCash

Registered User
Jun 16, 2009
16,532
7,300
He wants to stay in TB and wants his triplet brothers to stay too. Great day in Tampa Bay!!

#CupsOverCash!!
 

DFC

Registered User
Sep 26, 2013
47,906
24,239
NB
Except that they only play half their games in Florida. The other half are out of state and they need to pay the state income tax wherever else they're playing.

It ends up being a relatively insignificant difference in the end. Otherwise why would anyone sign in California? Or New York?

I think both the Hedman and stamkos deals are set to be paid largely in bonuses.
 

Hictor Vedman*

Unregistered Hedman
Sep 30, 2014
2,244
1
Ottawa
Seems to me Kuch is much more highly regarded now than VH was in 2012. Was VH slated to make $6 and signed for $4? I get wanting to pat Stevie on the back, but this seems like a reach.
No, but for comparison's sake, he was the second leading defender in scoring on the team at the time. The first was that guy named Carle, who got the 5.5M AAV deal in 2012 that haunted Tampa for years.

So, I'd say yes, it was a pretty good steal at the time as well. Especially when you look at the rest of the roster at the time. It was putrid.
 

ThunderRoad

Registered User
Apr 24, 2006
915
423
Tampa
It's not a loophole. It's the law. Not sure how you expect that to be changed by the NHL.

No kidding. It's no different than a team using the argument that its city is a great hockey market with youth leagues and has a mystical historical background. Not to mention Florida has pretty high property taxes/cost of housing/home insurance which quickly cancels out the no state income tax, which I found out when I moved back to the state. Was reminded that the "sunshine tax" is still in place.
 

TampaJay

Registered User
Jan 16, 2016
779
151
Wow, amazing deal for the Lightening, granted, they probably lose him in 4 years when he hits UFA or are going to have shell out big bucks. But that is the consequences of the salary cap, but they have an amazing 3 year window. Regret not taking him earlier in my fantasy draft.

Does this mean Point goes down?

Brayden Point probably stays up while Callahan is on LTIR, but this is unusual. Yzerman likes to overcook prospects. Point is the first AHL eligible rookie in the Yzerman era to make the roster.
 

dechire

TBL Stanley Cup Champs 2020 2021
Jul 8, 2014
16,723
4,016
inconnu
Nobody cared when TB wasn't spending to the cap.

Is it an advantage? Definitely. The weather's not bad either.

Housing prices are pretty good too. There's a lot of things that make Tampa a desirable place to live.
 

CapitalsCupReality

It’s Go Time!!
Feb 27, 2002
66,290
21,270
It's not a loophole. It's the law. Not sure how you expect that to be changed by the NHL. It's also been the law for the entire cap era so why are people acting like it's a new thing ?

The advantage is the player clears more than his peers on the same contract value. Nobody is acting like it's a new thing, but when teams play this advantage and sign players to outrageously undermarket deals people start to complain about unfair playing fields and 7% of the salary cap (or whatever the average difference is around the league) is significant.

Simple accounting can easily recognize the % advantage and level this for all teams without impacting the tax laws or the players pay.

I'm just saying I bet it will be a point of discussion by the league, with some wanting the playing field leveled.
 

CanadienShark

Registered User
Dec 18, 2012
40,048
14,736
Not a great deal, but not bad. He'll cash in BIG next time, but until then, he's on a steal of a contract. I think that how this deal is viewed will depend heavily on his next deal.
 

DFC

Registered User
Sep 26, 2013
47,906
24,239
NB
RFA with arbitration rights, so he's going to have ALL the leverage in 2019.

Still a great contract for Yzerman, but NK is going to get his money. It just might be from someone else in 2020.

Maybe, but it's worth the risk to keep this core intact for three years. This was a huge step toward doing that. The cup window is wiiiiide open now.

And TB has plenty of money coming off the books over the next year or two.
 

dechire

TBL Stanley Cup Champs 2020 2021
Jul 8, 2014
16,723
4,016
inconnu
The advantage is the player clears more than his peers on the same contract value. Nobody is acting like it's a new thing, but when teams play this advantage and sign players to outrageously undermarket deals start happening people start to complain about unfair playing fields and 7% of the salary cap (or whatever the average difference is around the league) is significant.

Simple accounting can easily recognize the % advantage and level this for all teams without impacting the tax laws or the players pay.

I'm just saying I bet it will be a point of discussion by the league, with some wanting the playing field leveled.

Well there's no way to level the playing field. It's the law. It's not changing no matter how much some high tax markets might complain (while no doubt telling their own players the various benefits of choosing to play in their city)
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad