Mc5RingsAndABeer
5-14-6-1
- May 25, 2011
- 20,184
- 1,385
Really? People want to argue hall is some amazing franchise player but literally every other player of that caliber in that time period were able to get their team to win games. And don't even try to tell me Crosby didn't impact anything in his 2nd season. Hall just wasn't good enough. He is a slightly better Rick Nash when it comes to ability to lead a team.
Let's put it this way, would you still think mcdavid is the best player in the world if he played the first 6 years of his career without enough of an impact for his team to make the playoffs?
He's a franchise winger, but he's not able to do it alone.
Every other franchise player had someone else on or near that level, save Tavares. And even he got the exact same criticism Hall did until their management addressed the numerous deficiencies on that team.
I would still think so if we didn't have Pulju, Draisaitl, Larsson, Klefbom, etc... and he was clearly a dominant player on the ice.
Rookie Crosby was dominant as **** and the Penguins finished 1 point out of last place. MSL won an Art Ross and Stamkos won the Rocket (in the SAME season) and TBL was drafting at the top the next year. Hockey is a team sport.