Thanks for the leg work. I'm anxiously awaiting @The CyNick twist and shifting goal posts
The king of spin
Thanks for the leg work. I'm anxiously awaiting @The CyNick twist and shifting goal posts
Of course they had the mission impossible theme song blasting in the background!"50 points? geeze Kyle I said I wanted a challenge but mission impossible isn't a challenge"
Of course they had the mission impossible theme song blasting in the background!
Tavares quickly calculates 15% chance he goes too shelf 40% 5 hole 80% off the right pad, but if I were on the ice with these too 100% chance the goalie and both defensemen only cover Mitch and me so it's a tap in! 97.265% I'm going to accept this mission"Mr Tavares, your mission should you choose to accept it: help Zach Hyman get 50 points. As usual should you be compromised or fail your mission we will deny all knowledge of you and your mission"
That was the video they presented. Marner on wires lowering down to the ice to plant a puck on hyman's stick with an open net
It's actually the dumbest argument.
Tavares not only replaces but improves JVR's production AND from a more premium position on the ice AND does not need to be sheltered to do so.
AJ or Kappy producing 43 points to replace Bozak isn't that far fetched, but if you consider the Leafs also "lost" Komarov this off-season (which apparently isn't an issue) and his 7 goals/19 points, AJ/Kappy together should be able to not only match the 18 goals and 62 points, but also improve on that. This is also ignoring the defensive gains from it.
Tavares quickly calculates 15% chance he goes too shelf 40% 5 hole 80% off the right pad, but if I were on the ice with these too 100% chance the goalie and both defensemen only cover Mitch and me so it's a tap in! 97.265% I'm going to accept this mission
But in the montage he wins the puck battle and passes it to a wide open CGI of Tavares who has tap in100% hyman dumps it into the corner and battles for it. That was the blooper reel, "cut!! Hyman just put the puck into the net mate".
But in the montage he wins the puck battle and passes it to a wide open CGI of Tavares who has tap in
Not to mention Johnson kills penalties and actually hustles when back-checking and playing without the puck.Ray Ferraro keeps bringing up how anreas Johnsson won’t score as many goals as jvr so the leafs are down goals there. Jvr scores 36 and bozak scores 11 to match their loss we need 47 goals. JT scores 37 last season so Johnsson would need only 10 goals next year for us to be even with goals scored last year. I’m fairly convinced Johnsson can get 10 goals. It amazes me the spin done in the media are trying to put in this
@The CyNick
"Most players don't care about that stuff. When you talk to enough pro players you understand that they don't think about things like childhood teams. They care about their own best interests. Where they are most comfortable. If playing for the hometown team really mattered, Lindros would have been here in his prime, Stamkos would have signed here and a number of other hometown guys would have as well.
That's not to say we can't sign JT. I just don't think that "you'll live forever" nonsense works. It will come down to does he think he can win here, and also does he value winning over being comfortable for the next 7-8 years." https://hfboards.mandatory.com/thre...-well-for-some.2482221/page-60#post-145935163
So would you say that you were completely wrong about pitching the legacy of bringing a cup back to Toronto and the "you'll live forever" nonsense playing a role? And are you back tracking now that Tavares picked the team he thought was in his own best interests and gave him the best shot to win?
Because seems like Dubas used both angles to convince him
"Well looks like the impact of selecting Dubas over Lou will cost us Hunter and a good shot at Tavares.
Shows the value of an experienced GM with a strong reputation. Hopefully Dubas has some tricks up his sleeve to counter."https://hfboards.mandatory.com/thre...ed-free-agency.2500129/page-58#post-147125915
Or would you say that you were completely wrong about Dubas costing us our shot at Tavares?
Not to mention Johnson kills penalties and actually hustles when back-checking and playing without the puck.
Interesting stats on why JT may be underrated. Charts pulled from an article on The Athletic by Ian Tulloch.
View attachment 128585
View attachment 128583
so no credit to the guy who actually signed Tavares, but credit to the guy who did not...Nothing wrong with what I said there.
I didn't think JT would come here ONLY based on childhood dreams. I may have underestimated the value of that to him based on his bedsheet Twitter post. But if the Leafs were garbage, he wouldn't have signed here. Having the chance to win over the entirety of his contract was key in his decision. He said as much and I said as much.
In the end Dubas in my estimation was not a huge negative or positive in the process. Lou on the other hand came in and based on his presence and track record almost managed to throw up a hail mary TD and keep JT in Long Island. At the end of the day, there was more negative than positive with the Islanders, so JT went to the team he thought have him the best chance of winning. It just so happens it also checked the box of boyhood dream, which clearly was valuable to him. So Lou never really had a shot. That's no knock against him.
Tying this back to Dubas. My point in the post you are qouting was that Dubas selling the childhood dream aspect is nothing new. That's the same pitch every GM in Leafs history has used on GTA kids. So you can't give him credit for using that angle, when it's used by everyone. Again, Dubas had luck on his side and when he was making that pitch, because it was the one guy who actually cared about it.
And you certainly can't credit Dubas for the young core because he didn't bring in any of the guys that convinced JT this was the place he could win and didn't need to remove key pieces to fit him in.
Maybe you need to better articulate what exactly you think I was off base about. Because I'm not seeing it.
Hah. That's a pretty telling summary.so no credit to the guy who actually signed Tavares, but credit to the guy who did not...
Islanders could always offer 8 years and were seen as a heavy favourite to sign Tavares before Lou came aboard. so why give him credit?
Hey, Everyone Guess What?!
John Tavares Is a Leaf!
continue on with your day.
so no credit to the guy who actually signed Tavares, but credit to the guy who did not...
Islanders could always offer 8 years and were seen as a heavy favourite to sign Tavares before Lou came aboard. so why give him credit?