Why isn't Landeskog on the team?
I think people are getting a bit too excited about him just because of his age. He barely just turned 17 and yet he's so good... Still, we have such a strong team this year, IMO it would be a mistake to bring him along. I don't think we would have brought Pääjärvi as a 16-year-old either if we had only had better depth back then. Same with Finland when they let Granlund play last year. In my eyes, unless the kid is just insanely talented (I.e. Adam Larsson/Victor Hedman) then bringing such a young player is a sign of weakness and lack of depth.
Landeskog is going to become a star in the future, but that doesn't mean we don't have better players for the team right NOW! Basically what I'm trying to say is, if a player is good at a young age, that doesn't mean he is better than a player 1 or 2 years older who has had that additional time to develop. Who is going to be a better player in the
future is kind of irrelevant for a tournament that is being played
today.
Rumours say that Per MÃ¥rts and the Swedish Hockey Association wants to "punish" players who "defect" to Canada instead of remaining in Sweden. Not sure how true those rumours are...
I don't buy that argument. Sure, I'm a little disappointed that Wallén didn't make it, but Figren comes to mind, as well as Carl Hagelin and Mario Kempe. And those are all from the same year!
If a player is good enough, then he plays. I think we often forget that we all have our streaks of homerism when we're sitting here, discussing who should be on the team and who shouldn't, and then it's easy to get bummed if your favorite player didn't make it, and start going "yeah well NA players are being discriminated against!". But Pär Mårts actually gets paid for selecting the roster. It's his job, gents. I have all the confidence in the world that he knows who suits which role on the team a lot better than we do.