not sure if rules have changed, but I thought if the net has been moved prior puck going in the net, it can be still ruled a goal? That second one called back to me was a goal.
"63.7 Awarded Goal - In the event that the goal post is displaced, either
deliberately or accidentally, by a defending player, prior to the puck
crossing the goal line between the normal position of the goalposts,
the Referee may award a goal.
In order to award a goal in this situation, the goal post must have
been displaced by the actions of a defending player, the attacking
player must have an imminent scoring opportunity prior to the goal
post being displaced, and it must be determined that the puck would
have entered the net between the normal position of the goal posts.
If the goal post is deliberately displaced by a goalkeeper or player
during the course of a “breakaway,” a goal will be awarded to the non-
offending team, and the play will be subject to automatic disciplinary
review by the League.
When the goal post has been displaced deliberately by the
defending team when their goalkeeper has been removed for an extra
attacker thereby preventing an impending goal by the attacking team,
the Referee shall award a goal to the attacking team.
The goal frame is considered to be displaced if either or both goal
pegs are no longer in their respective holes in the ice, or the net has
come completely off one or both pegs, prior to or as the puck enters
the goal."
I could not see the net well from my seat, and cannot find anything that suggests this is subject to video review or coach's challenge.
Surprising, since it seems they review every second goal the Wolves score, but not I guess when the outcome might be in their favor.
I've definitely seen goals awarded in the NHL when one of the posts is knocked off it's peg prior to the puck crossing the line.
