jellybeans
Registered User
- Nov 9, 2007
- 1,387
- 1,197
First game in 3 years good game to watch Musty in the first was a turnover machine and really like Toure.
Agreed! I’ve mentioned that previously. He makes plays that put the receiver in a tough spotFirst game in 3 years good game to watch Musty in the first was a turnover machine and really like Toure.
Did he or did he not do it twice in the game today? Pretty simple? I know fans of Dale Hunter hockey have trouble understanding the rules, as well as integrity though.137 career regular season and playoff games. Only one other time he was called for delay of game and there's no guarantee that was for knocking the net off. But sure you go ahead and blame your teams loss based on the results of 0.7% of games played
Musty also made a nice pass for a goal.Agreed! I’ve mentioned that previously. He makes plays that put the receiver in a tough spot
Also thought Mauro had a tough game and looked out of place, especially on pp.
Rough but have to agree,Nothing of value is being lost with him in the stands, luckily. May have to kill 1 less penalty.
I don’t know man I really don’tImpressive 2nd . I’ll skip the intermission so called entertainment…Sweet merciful crap
I don’t know man I really don’tImpressive 2nd . I’ll skip the intermission so called entertainment…Sweet merciful crap
Ya I know. He does makes some good plays, often surprising but ya he can be exposed. He’s not the first to have that kind of brain cramp and melt down behind the net though.Nice assist by D.Rob on the London game winning goal just give it away
We didn’t get the goaltending early on. I didn’t like either of those first two goals. Add to that the power-play couldn’t come through.The 1st period was the killer. 2 PP goals ( one tail end of pp) and 1 shorty. Ouch.
Can only imagine what this team could been with at least two overages that are difference makers. We must have the weakest group in the entire league. When I review the end of the season this will be one of the major Achilles of the season.I don’t know man I really don’t
Ya I know. He does makes some good plays, often surprising but ya he can be exposed. He’s not the first to have that kind of brain cramp and melt down behind the net though.
We didn’t get the goaltending early on. I didn’t like either of those first two goals. Add to that the power-play couldn’t come through.
Was Krawchuk decent? Maybe. Was he great? No. Did we win?
Obviously, the positive to take out of this game is the comeback. The wolves have shown they can play with any team in this league and that’s encouraging. Tomorrow night should be interesting as it is a possible playoff matchup . I’d like to see Krawchuk again but we’ll see.
as far as Brochu give me a break, there was no one around him both times when the net came off. Shameful should’ve been a goal the first time anyway.
I'd say that's a good thing, no? You would have preferred they sell assets just to finish 4th this year and get rolled by Ottawa/NB etc. in the 2nd round?If Paps had paid more attention at the trade deadline to this season than next season we would have been in a better position to finish fourth in our conference. London is a look into the future to where a team has to be to really be a contender. Is Paps the guy to get us there?
There have been several blind-siding, head check, slew-foot majors receiving no further discipline this season.Each team laid an egg in the first two periods. The third was a battle to the buzzer and who is able to capitalize the most on mistakes and it happened to be London. Could of went either way but them the brakes. Unfortunate we didn’t salvage one point. Will be tough to regroup on this on and head out to Barrie tomorrow.
I guess the OHL staff were short staffed and didn’t update the Media site until game time. LARMAND has no friends in the OHL head office. Suspended indefinite. Unlike like guys Arnsby and Gureyv who seem to have their suspension dropped after being given majors. This league has a double standard IMO.
WJ
It happened twice in the game last night. Intent is what the question is. The fact that it's a rare occurrence shows that it most likely wasn't. Why would he pick Sudbury of all teams to all of a sudden start this?Did he or did he not do it twice in the game today? Pretty simple? I know fans of Dale Hunter hockey have trouble understanding the rules, as well as integrity though.
London really needed a point on this 3 game trip through the central division?It happened twice in the game last night. Intent is what the question is. The fact that it's a rare occurrence shows that it most likely wasn't. Why would he pick Sudbury of all teams to all of a sudden start this?
Many goalies purposely dislodge the net for a stoppage of play, Brochu was one of those in his most recent game. Was it something new for him in the last few games of his OA season; highly unlikely.It's funny though that you reference "Hunter Hockey " and "integrity " when the Wolves are the most penalized team in the league..
Intent is difficult to prove, neither you nor I can actually prove it. All we have is our opinions. I. Not trying to establish if there was Intent or not. However the statement was implied that this is some sort of regular occurrence, to which I provided the stats to refute thatAs far as Brochu give me a break, there was no one around him both times when the net came off. Shameful should’ve been a goal the first time anyway.
You can throw out whatever kind of stat you want but I guess there’s obviously a first time for everything because he did it twice tonight. Not sure how you can watch and see anything different.
And yet only 1 other delay of game call in his career, which may or may not have been for intentionally dislodging the net.Many goalies purposely dislodge the net for a stoppage of play, Brochu was one of those in his most recent game. Was it something new for him in the last few games of his OA season; highly unlikely.
And if it was done twice in his 127th game, you’d figure he had done it before. If Brochu did not do everything he could to help his team win, he probably would not be one of the best goalies over the past couple of seasonsIntent is difficult to prove, neither you nor I can actually prove it. All we have is our opinions. I. Not trying to establish if there was Intent or not. However the statement was implied that this is some sort of regular occurrence, to which I provided the stats to refute that
And yet only 1 other delay of game call in his career, which may or may not have been for intentionally dislodging the net.
You'd figure if it was commonplace the word would get around to the leagues officials.
And if it were a regular occurrence as has been implied then he would have been called previously for it.And if it was done twice in his 127th game, you’d figure he had done it before. If Brochu did not do everything he could to help his team win, he probably would not be one of the best goalies over the past couple of seasons
Quite the assumption. This is getting petty.And if it was done twice in his 127th game, you’d figure he had done it before. If Brochu did not do everything he could to help his team win, he probably would not be one of the best goalies over the past couple of seasons
Not necessarily if Brochu is one of the very best at dislodging the net. But now the refs are on to him; o-ohAnd if it were a regular occurrence as has been implied then he would have been called previously for it.
The officials are much maligned in this league, but.i doubt they are that slowNot necessarily if Brochu is one of the very best at dislodging the net. But now the refs are on to him; o-oh
No doubt; one guy can’t accept that his favourite team’s goalie dislodges the net.Quite the assumption. This is getting petty.
Game is over. The Wolves accounted themselves well.
Otto is advocating for his goalie. Rightfully so. And you are casting unproven dispersions of said goalie based on a single game. I doubt either will blink in this case. Best to just walk away.No doubt; one guy can’t accept that his favourite team’s goalie dislodges the net.
I would want a goalie that does what he is able to win. That is not a flaw imo. To a certain extent at least, Hextall type crazy might be a flaw.