sting101
Registered User
- Feb 8, 2012
- 16,773
- 16,084
Skinner has been put into a dream situation. He's a fantastic finisher but a passenger when it comes to getting pucks back or helping wear teams down. His scoring will easily make him on paper a "better" player because McDavid or Draisaitl need smart players that can finish.The bolded is exactly why the offer sheets really hurt the Oilers, especially in long run.
As for the rest, I was answering to a post that this hurt the Oilers saying that almost every Oiler fan penciled Broberg in top 4 and Holloway in top 9 next season... And I doubt that next season Holloway will be better than the 32 years old fosil Skinner. In long run, we will miss him, indeed, if we let him go.
In saying that Holloway is very important in his own right as the season is a marathon not a sprint.
Oilers will need good legs or the impetus will continue to fall on McDrai to drive possession even more than in the past coming off a long exhausting season. The question isn't about production player for player it's about work (physicality checking being first to pucks) and balancing that while getting enough productivity to still win.
It wont mean jack if your best players are worn out by May of next year if Henrique Arvidsson and Skinner outproduced McLoed Foegele and Holloway. That is why Holloway might get a little different consideration for whether he can become worth it even if he hasn't earned it yet. Arvidsson if healthy still works his ass off
Broberg's deal is just too cost prohibitive without a firm belief he's worth getting rid of 3 million in cap and then having more impact than the player/s they moved. It puts an incredible amount of pressure to be a good top4 by playoffs and creates a lot of interim issues. I probably take the 2nd but i havent watched enough of him to say with conviction