News: Steven Stamkos to hit free agency on July 1st

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hobnobs

Pinko
Nov 29, 2011
9,377
2,745
There was already some hard feelings early this season when Stamkos didn't get the extension....now Tampa is low balling him...
Seems different this time....

Name 1 star player drafted by Tampa to play entire career there...

Well tbf Tampa has been around for what? 30ish years. The comparables like Ducks (one, Getzlaf), Sens (none), Panthers (none) Sharks (one, Couture) but yeah, no star players yet. We'll see with Hedman.
 

SomeDude

Registered User
Mar 6, 2006
18,283
31,329
Pittsburghish
I5ALCZL53FHLROFBIEIGCXICH4.jpg
At least Tampa can bring these back
 

Crunchrulz

Registered User
Apr 30, 2010
1,780
624
USA
Honestly I think shaving off our already weak depth is the worst move here. We need to trade a bigger name. That way we get real assets back while creating the cap space to keep Stamkos. To me, it's Sergachev who should go, because he's about to make 8.5m playing behind Hedman and McDonagh. And he would return a real asset while giving us the flexibility to keep Stamkos.


When you trade 5 assets for an unproven guy, thus draining everything you have in the cupboard to improve the team in one move, yeah, it's gonna be an issue no matter when it happens. Especially when the guy shows up and looks like a fringe NHL player.


When you trade 5 assets for an unproven guy, thus draining everything you have in the cupboard to improve the team in one move, yeah, it's gonna be an issue no matter when it happens. Especially when the guy shows up and looks like a fringe NHL player.


When you trade 5 assets for an unproven guy, thus draining everything you have in the cupboard to improve the team in one move, yeah, it's gonna be an issue no matter when it happens. Especially when the guy shows up and looks like a fringe NHL player.
The cupboard was almost gone before the Jeannot trade.

Tampa fans had NO problem trading younger assets and draft picks when they were winning. All of the sudden, the one and done post seasons are causing many to question those moves. Moves that ANY professional organization would have made to win back-to-back Championships I might add.

The reality is, the Salary Cap has finally caught up to the Lightning and much of the fan base refuses to remove their rose-colored glasses to see and understand that.
 

57special

Posting the right way since 2012.
Sep 5, 2012
49,980
21,833
MN
Would love him on MN, but it's a year too soon due to the cap penalties. Could probably sell him on centering Boldy and Kaprizov, at least part time. JEE could take all the hard defensive minutes.
 

Ragdoll

Registered User
Feb 15, 2018
1,214
1,645
Western travel is still very much a thing. For an older guy who has deep roots in Florida, it's a very tough sell.
I highly doubt it will happen. Just wishful thinking, imagine him on Connor or Leons wing.
 

jkutswings

hot piss hockey
Jul 10, 2014
11,584
9,638
Anaheim has a boatload of cap space, a roster full of youth, is looking to take the next step and make the playoffs....
No offense, but Anaheim is drafting third overall after finishing the season with 59 points. Vegas was the last wild card in the West with 98 points.

How exactly is one player (or even 2 or 3) making such an enormous difference?
 

DFC

Registered User
Sep 26, 2013
47,928
24,275
NB
The cupboard was almost gone before the Jeannot trade.

Tampa fans had NO problem trading younger assets and draft picks when they were winning. All of the sudden, the one and done post seasons are causing many to question those moves. Moves that ANY professional organization would have made to win back-to-back Championships I might add.

The reality is, the Salary Cap has finally caught up to the Lightning and much of the fan base refuses to remove their rose-colored glasses to see and understand that.
Of course we didn't, because we got a return on the assets rather than Tanner Jeannot. Nobody's saying "Don't trade any assets to win!" We would like to have a couple of assets TO trade, but unfortunately we spent them all on Tanner Jeannot... That trade is a laughing stock for a reason, because it looked crazy, and WAS crazy. It wasn't just "trading young assets to win." It was trading all the assets for a guy who barely belongs in the NHL.

Did the salary cap catch up? Of course. Were there mistakes made that made the decline a lot faster than it had to be? Pretty massive ones.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mckay
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad