Pwnasaurus
Registered User
I really wanted to see the Rockies draft a particular player just because it would be fun but I can't argue with Lindor as a building block.
If the goal is to simply rank the best overall players to start a franchise with, should we be taking so much into account the state of each particular franchise? That would seem to skew the list mostly based on a random draft order of franchises. If the goal is to definitively put yourself in the ownership shoes of a specific franchise then I stand corrected.
The Texas Rangers will take, with the 13th pick, shortstop Corey Seager.
#1 prospect in baseball? Check. Instant impact on call-up? Check. Long-term control? Well, he's not FA eligible until 2022.
While his call-up last year is obviously a bit inflated currently I don't see that being beyond his ceiling given his minor league track record. Also I love his swing even if it's from the wrong side. His offensive upside is huge and he plays at a premium position.
Finally Donaldson gets picked. I thought maybe he died or something. Was deciding between Arenado and Donaldson at pick #8 but went with Arenado because of his age.
I really wanted to see the Rockies draft a particular player just because it would be fun but I can't argue with Lindor as a building block.
I wanted Lindor too
Age and years of control have to be considered two of the most important things when picking a franchise player though. Obviously skill and ability have to be there as well but all things equal I think you have to go with the young, cost controlled option. Remember you're just selecting a core of 4 people. Theoretically your organization would have budget to fill out the rest of the roster. The less you spend on core, the more you could spend on the rest. Obviously it's a balance and maybe I'm going too deep into it but if we're treating it like real franchises then I think it makes sense.
I realize that but Donaldson is only 30. Production wise he's better than any other 3B in the game. Contract wise, $11.6 mill this year and $17 mill in 2017 while still being under team control in 2018. Arenado on the other hand has 1 extra year of eligibility but he is going to get pricey this offseason. Arenado and his agent will use Donaldson's contract as a starting point.
We could easily be talking about Arenado surpassing him in that timeframe though. Donaldson has stiff competition with Machado and Arenado.
We could. To start your franchise I'd take Machado/Arenado/Bryant before Donaldson but the point I'm making is that he should be right after those guys. If I had pick #9 or #10 I easily grab Donaldson.
Darko, I don't disagree either. There's nothing wrong with selecting JD at all. The guy is a beast but you also have to think compared to a guy like Arenado who is 5 years younger, yes, Arenado will start getting pricey soon but those are for what we are assuming to be peak years. When JD is up for his big contract in a few years, he is likely on the other side of his peak. So when you factor in team control and the years that you are paying for its easy to see why the high end players with youth on their side are so valued. Again, JD is a great pick but as MB suggested there are other factors in play that make the decisions here a bit more difficult.
The VP of sales wants you guys to win now.