Also couldn't there be more than 1 player on each team that could/would/should be picked in the top 30?
So how does it work once everyone makes their picks? Do we then vote to rank them 1-30 or something like that?
Also couldn't there be more than 1 player on each team that could/would/should be picked in the top 30?
I'm more or less interested in seeing how this fluctuates over time. Like maybe we do it again mid-season, pre-2017, etc...
So are only 1 player per team then? Seems like if you want the most accurate representation then scrap the team idea and just draft players 1-30
I like the team idea purely because, say if the A's started over. They wouldn't take a guy like Miguel Cabrera, but they'd still jump all over a guy like Harper or Trout. So, it forces you to think a bit in certain spots.
Oooohhhh, I see. You are the GM of a team and pick based on that team's current situation/needs. I thought it was if I was assigned the Blue Jays and Astros then I would pick one player off of the Jays and one player off of the Astros. I get it now.
Although if you are starting a franchise and everyone is up for grabs then wouldn't every team essentially be starting from scratch and in that case you just take the best player available. I guess contract/money factors in a bit but not as much in a vacuum.
Or are you talking that the A's would select Harper and he would get added to their current line-up?
I'm in.
The first 3-4 picks are probably really obvious
So... this is what I don't get.
If I was a low budget team like TB or MIA, I should take a good but cost controlled player? And if I was LAD or NYY, I take a star with a huge contract?
Or, should we just take BPA in our opinion?