OT: Star Wars: The Last Jedi Discussion Thread (SPOILERS!!!!)

mja

Everything was beautiful, and nothing hurt
Jan 7, 2005
12,738
29,442
Lucy the Elephant's Belly
There's really only one way to handle Fisher's passing, unfortunately. Leia is going to have an off-screen death. I expect that the first scene of Ep 9 will be a solemn state funeral of some kind befitting the passing of the leader of the resistance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rebels57

The Rage Kage

Registered User
Apr 21, 2014
6,257
5,118
I have a problem with holdo, not because of some feminist agenda like some people but because shes incredibly incompetent. Every single decision she made was a bad one and was the only reason a good hour of the movie happened.

Thats not to say all characters need to be infallible, but she pushed the limits of my suspension of disbelief.
 

Rebels57

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 28, 2014
78,078
125,485
I have a problem with holdo, not because of some feminist agenda like some people but because shes incredibly incompetent. Every single decision she made was a bad one and was the only reason a good hour of the movie happened.

Thats not to say all characters need to be infallible, but she pushed the limits of my suspension of disbelief.

I am a big Laura Dern fan but I didnt love the character either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Rage Kage

pit

5th Most Improved Poster
Jun 25, 2005
5,151
20,935
Toronto
Thats not to say all characters need to be infallible, but she pushed the limits of my suspension of disbelief.

Agreed. There was zero reason to keep the evacuation plan secret unless there was the suspicion of a spy on board or some other reason. The secrecy was a futile gesture that created dissent for no tangible gain (aside from the story's need to try to make a point to Poe).
 

Ghosts Beer

I saw Goody Fletcher with the Devil!
Feb 10, 2014
22,759
16,519
Some thoughts after reading the thread (apologies in advance for the length):

I think the reason the film is so divisive is because we all want very different things out of a Star Wars movie. I'm a 40+ year old man who adored the original trilogy but never got into the EU and disliked the prequels. All I want my Star Wars movie to do is to make me feel the same sense of excitement and adventure I felt when I was 5 years old and pretended to be Han Solo looking for Luke on Hoth whenever it snowed. But if you're younger than I am, or really got into the EU, or whatever, you might want a darker Nolan-esque reimagining of the series or a nerdy plot-heavy chapter from the EU. But I am so not here for any of that.

For me, the complaints about the plots of these movies are silly. The plots of these movies have always been beside the point, going back to the original trilogy. It's always been about the spectacle, characters, and overarching themes. One thing I HATE about the prequels is they got mired in plot, as if anyone cared about midi-chlorians or the clone wars or political maneuvering in the senate. I just want to see dogfights in space and lightsaber battles along with the occasional quip and some space opera hokum, goddammit!

Complaints about BB-8 operating the walker or porgs seem to forget that selling toys has always been a major part of the series going back to 1977. I turned 7 in 1983, and I ****ing loved (and still love) the ****ing ewoks. My sons were just as delighted by the porgs, and I didn't mind them one bit,, and one of the best laughs in the film is the porgs giving Chewy a guilt trip for his dining choices.

The social justice run amok complaints are ridiculous, and if **** like this bothers you that much, then you might be the one with the agenda. First of all, if there was ever a series where a female character could be as physically powerful as the male characters without it feeling forced (no pun intended), it's the one in which characters have magical ****ing "force" powers. Secondly, the myopic reading of the female characters saving the male characters from themselves is facile and completely wrong. The female-led resistance is on the brink of complete annihilation until it's ultimately saved by two male characters - Luke & Poe, with a big assist from Rey. The character of Rose isn't merely there for representation. Sure, part of her casting is for that reason (and also to help sell tickets in Asia), but they're definitely setting up something of a love rectangle for the next film with Rose/Finn/Rey/Kylo Ren. Also, the actress' portrayal of a spunky backbencher fangirling over her heroes and then suddenly being thrust onto the field of action was a lot of fun, at least in my opinion. And ironically, it's the roguish Solo-esque Poe Daemeron that doesn't appear to have a love interest, subverting expectations.

And that brings me to my final point. I love the homage / remix quality of the last two episodes. Part of the most fun of The Force Awakens to me was the knowing way in which it called back to the original trilogy and shuffled up various elements from those films. I didn't find it unoriginal, I viewed it as an homage, and part of the fun of the movie experience for me was drawing parallels between them. One reason I liked The Last Jedi so much was that so many of my expectations where subverted in this film after they were set up, and I was constantly surprised. After the TLJ, I'm optimistic that Kylo Ren is on an anti-Vader arc that ends with him being unredeemed, which is interesting as hell. But mostly, both of these films made Star Wars fun again, after the prequels very nearly sucked all of the goddamn life out of the series, and for that I will forever be thankful.

You didn’t think I wasn’t going to respond, did you? ;)
A. Thanks for saying I “don’t get to define feminism.” Didn’t think I was defining it, just saying it went over the top.

Webster’s does define it:
1. The theory of the political, economic, & social equality of the sexes.
2. Organized activity on behalf of women’s rights & interests.

Well, based on the dictionary’s definition of feminism (I hope you’ll allow it), my assertion is that this “Star Wars” movie was an organized activity on behalf of women’s interests that goes way overboard. To the point it would be seen as awful if the genders were reversed. That’s not equality. It doesn’t promote political, economic, & social equality of the sexes. It promotes men are dumb & impulsive & need women to lead & save them from their gender-based impulsivity.
You’re treating feminism like a sacred concept that must go unchecked. Everything needs a check. That’s why the founding fathers made 3 branches of government.

B. Congratulations on your son being just as happy to play with Rey as a male warrior. Not sure how you truly know that, but, regardless, my point is the main audience for Star *Wars* is young men, & I think most young men identify with male action heroes. Isn’t part of the reason TV shows & movies & dolls promote diversity to engage more people who can better identify? Well, here Star Wars completely alienated their main audience from an identity perspective. Young boys (with exceptions like your son) are going to be drawn more to male fighters & generals than females. The drop off in sales supports my point.

C. The sports stuff. It’s logically inconsistent to defend preferring male sports to women’s sports, yet you get rankled over the concept of preferring to watch male military leaders & warriors to female. Well, sports are a form of combat, yet suddenly I’m a misogynist while you justify those who prefer men’s sports. Really, you’re just a hypocrite.
 
Last edited:

Ghosts Beer

I saw Goody Fletcher with the Devil!
Feb 10, 2014
22,759
16,519
aVQoXp
Oh, & remember, the woman in black is in charge of Star Wars now if you don’t think there’s an agenda: Redirect Notice
 

mja

Everything was beautiful, and nothing hurt
Jan 7, 2005
12,738
29,442
Lucy the Elephant's Belly
You didn’t think I wasn’t going to respond, did you?;)

Why would you assume that? I said at the outset that I was attempting to have a conversation, despite any misgivings I had that you really wouldn't be down for one (in contrast with just lamely exchanging rants, which I think you're more than down with.)

A. Thanks for saying I “don’t get to define feminism.” Didn’t think I was defining it, just saying it went over the top.

Webster’s does define it:
1. The theory of the political, economic, & social equality of the sexes.
2. Organized activity on behalf of women’s rights & interests.

Well, based on the dictionary’s definition of feminism (I hope you’ll allow it), my assertion is that this “Star Wars” movie was an organized activity on behalf of women’s interests that goes way overboard. To the point it would be seen as awful if the genders were reversed. That’s not equality. It doesn’t promote political, economic, & social equality of the sexes. It promotes men are dumb & impulsive & need women to lead & save them from their gender-based impulsivity.

I went into a lengthy breakdown tearing apart your reading of the film, which you didn't rebut at all. You're projecting stuff onto the film that's not there (ahem, because actually you're the one with the agenda). Anyway:

1. Organized activity on behalf of women's interests? The film exists TO MAKE MONEY; nothing more, nothing less. To the extent that diversity aids in that aim, it will be inclusive. There's a reason Rogue One featured 2 Asian characters, and it had nothing to do with social justice. It had everything to do with the box office in China. And what's more, that's fine! It's perfectly okay to have a diverse cast of characters in a movie, even if it is primarily to sell more tickets.

2. The film does not promote the idea that men are dumb and impulsive and that women are wise and heroic. (You've misread the film, because you engaged in a ton of confirmation bias when you watched it.) Finn makes a heroic decision to sacrifice himself, that Rose stops because she has deep romantic feelings for him. Poe is RIGHTLY concerned with Holdo's lack of transparency and apparent lack of a plan. In fact, Holdo's needless secrecy is pretty damn close to a (contrived) plot device, and one can argue (and many in this very thread have) that it makes her incompetent. Luke literally transcends the physical realm to save the resistance, and it's Poe that stops to think and work out how to escape. Kylo Ren uses his master's arrogance against him to save Rey, even if in the end it was to try to lure her to the dark side. Meanwhile, Holdo is arguably incompetent and Leia does almost nothing of consequence, and is in a f***ing coma for the entire 2nd act. The attack on maleness that you see in the film isn't actually there.

3. And you are trying to define feminism. You have a caricature of it in your head, that functions as a strawman. Believe it or not, feminism is NOT the idea that men are inherently evil, or dumb, or impulsive; and that women are inherently good, or wise, or thoughtful. It's not the idea that women are better than men. I know a bunch of feminists. Not one of them believes any of that. By the way, how many feminists do you personally know? How many feminists are you friends with? I'm sincerely asking.

You’re treating feminism like a sacred concept that must go unchecked. Everything needs a check. That’s why the founding fathers made 3 branches of government.

You are a very confused person.

1. Retire the founding fathers line. It doesn't make you sound smart, it just makes you sound way out of your depth.

2. Feminism as in (fighting for) equal rights? Yes, that's fairly sacred, and what issue could you possibly take with it? Do you believe that women deserve equal rights? And, if you do, do you believe that they've fully achieved equal rights?

3. Now, that doesn't mean one has to agree with all of feminist thought. I'm particularly suspicious of anything that smacks of dogma, and so I'm lots of fun at parties, if anyone would ever invite me to one. There's radical fringe stuff out there that's just nuts. There are also a few mainstream ideas that I take exception with. But feminists aren't some hive mind, they argue with each other over this stuff. I know, I've seen them do it.

B. Congratulations on your son being just as happy to play with Rey as a male warrior. Not sure how you truly know that, but, regardless, my point is the main audience for Star *Wars* is young men, & I think most young men identify with male action heroes. Isn’t part of the reason TV shows & movies & dolls promote diversity to engage more people who can better identify? Well, here Star Wars completely alienated their main audience from an identity perspective. Young boys (with exceptions like your son) are going to be drawn more to male fighters & generals than females. The drop off in sales supports my point.

Gosh, so much wrong here as well.

1. It's really sad that you don't think that boys can enjoy playing with female action figures. I mean, that's not even anything new. One of my favorite Star Wars toys growing up was the Endor-version of Leia on a speeder bike, and that was more than 30 years ago.

Anyway, how do I know? Well, he smiled when he opened the present, and then started playing with it. He also got 2 different versions of Kylo Ren (one of which came with the starter kit). His brother got that same starter kit Kylo Ren, along with Finn & Poe. For this particular series of toys, there are several dozen male figures compared with fewer than 10 female figures, including multiple Leias (and I think that there might even be more anonymous imperial / first order guards & stormtroopers than named female characters). So, no need to feel alienated; strong manly young men like yourself still have plenty of testicle-sporting warriors to choose from to try to stave off the impending calamity of declining action figure sales. I mean, just look at the number of prominent force users we've seen during the course of 9 films:

Females: Rey, Leia (whose big force power reveal after 9 films was to f***ing float through space).

Males: Luke, Yoda, Obi-Wan, Qui-Gon, Anakin / Vader, Darth Maul, Count Dooku, Mace Windu, Palpatine, Snoke, & Kylo Ren.

So, 2 vs. 11 or 12 depending on whether or not you view Anakin and Vader as separate characters. And we've seen multiple male force users in every movie except Rogue One (where it's just Vader), but there have only been 2 films that have featured even one female character having force power.

And why should males be alienated because the hero is female, anyway? Strip away your misreading of the film, and there is no attack on maleness in the film. It it ok for boys to watch / like movies where the hero is female in your version of the world? And if not, why not? Maybe that says a lot more about you, and your hang-ups, than any supposed feminist agenda?

2. Also, I hate to break it to you, but the audience for Star Wars is not limited to young men (it's sexist to even say that, as if somehow the whims of young men take priority over those of young women, but you won't see it, so whatever). My teenage daughter and her friends are all proud geeks. They love Harry Potter, they adore Stranger Things, and they're obsessed with Star Wars. My daughter's favorite character: Kylo Ren. There were literal tears in her eyes over his choosing the dark side. Her big ask for x-mas? A build your own R2D2 kit.

What's more, I happen to work with hundreds of teenagers for a living. I think you'd be greatly surprised about their attitudes towards gender (and yes, even amongst the young men). For example, I know a bunch of 15 year old male Star Wars nerds that couldn't possibly care less that there were 2 female military leaders in TLJ.

I'm curious. What's your background, if you don't mind my asking? Age, martial status, kids, etc.? Again, asking sincerely.

C. The sports stuff. It’s logically inconsistent to defend preferring male sports to women’s sports, yet you get rankled over the concept of preferring to watch male military leaders & warriors to female.

It's logically incoherent to compare preferring watching men's pro sports to whining about (non-existent) excessive female representation in a movie. I don't watch much women's pro sports, but I don't have an issue with women's pro sports. In fact, I think it's awesome that there's a high level women's professional basketball league.

And I don't know if you're aware of this, but when you watch Star Wars, all of that military stuff is pretend. Those people are acting. Shocking, I know, but it's true. Last I checked, women can act just as well as men can. Meanwhile, despite what you might believe, feminists are not under the delusion that optimal female athletic performance is on par with optimal male athletic performance.

As for the implication that female military leaders / warriors are somehow unrealistic, you do know that there are female soldiers and generals fighting wars all across the globe, including tens of thousands of women serving in all-female combat units against ISIS, right?

Well, sports are a form of combat,

No. No, they are most definitely not. As someone who's had no less than 6 family members serve in the military, including one female cousin, I find it astounding that someone could even believe that.

yet suddenly I’m a misogynist while you justify those who prefer men’s sports. Really, you’re just a hypocrite.

You may be a misogynist, but I have hope for you yet. But I doubt that the rest of the forum is at all interested in an extended exchange of encyclopedia-length posts on feminism, so if you'd like to continue, we could move to PMs.

And retire the sports thing. It's not the hammer that you think it is. It doesn't expose anyone's hypocrisy, it merely exposes that you have trouble making a coherent argument.

aVQoXp
Oh, & remember, the woman in black is in charge of Star Wars now if you don’t think there’s an agenda: Redirect Notice

Dude. That's the thing that triggers you? A f***ing innocuous t-shirt?

See, you look at that t-shirt and see some nefarious feminist agenda. I look at that t-shirt and see some women celebrating the fact that after 40 years there's finally a female character with force powers.
 

BrindamoursNose

Registered User
Oct 14, 2008
20,391
14,540
Why would you assume that? I said at the outset that I was attempting to have a conversation, despite any misgivings I had that you really wouldn't be down for one (in contrast with just lamely exchanging rants, which I think you're more than down with.)



I went into a lengthy breakdown tearing apart your reading of the film, which you didn't rebut at all. You're projecting stuff onto the film that's not there (ahem, because actually you're the one with the agenda). Anyway:

1. Organized activity on behalf of women's interests? The film exists TO MAKE MONEY; nothing more, nothing less. To the extent that diversity aids in that aim, it will be inclusive. There's a reason Rogue One featured 2 Asian characters, and it had nothing to do with social justice. It had everything to do with the box office in China. And what's more, that's fine! It's perfectly okay to have a diverse cast of characters in a movie, even if it is primarily to sell more tickets.

2. The film does not promote the idea that men are dumb and impulsive and that women are wise and heroic. (You've misread the film, because you engaged in a ton of confirmation bias when you watched it.) Finn makes a heroic decision to sacrifice himself, that Rose stops because she has deep romantic feelings for him. Poe is RIGHTLY concerned with Holdo's lack of transparency and apparent lack of a plan. In fact, Holdo's needless secrecy is pretty damn close to a (contrived) plot device, and one can argue (and many in this very thread have) that it makes her incompetent. Luke literally transcends the physical realm to save the resistance, and it's Poe that stops to think and work out how to escape. Kylo Ren uses his master's arrogance against him to save Rey, even if in the end it was to try to lure her to the dark side. Meanwhile, Holdo is arguably incompetent and Leia does almost nothing of consequence, and is in a ****ing coma for the entire 2nd act. The attack on maleness that you see in the film isn't actually there.

3. And you are trying to define feminism. You have a caricature of it in your head, that functions as a strawman. Believe it or not, feminism is NOT the idea that men are inherently evil, or dumb, or impulsive; and that women are inherently good, or wise, or thoughtful. It's not the idea that women are better than men. I know a bunch of feminists. Not one of them believes any of that. By the way, how many feminists do you personally know? How many feminists are you friends with? I'm sincerely asking.



You are a very confused person.

1. Retire the founding fathers line. It doesn't make you sound smart, it just makes you sound way out of your depth.

2. Feminism as in (fighting for) equal rights? Yes, that's fairly sacred, and what issue could you possibly take with it? Do you believe that women deserve equal rights? And, if you do, do you believe that they've fully achieved equal rights?

3. Now, that doesn't mean one has to agree with all of feminist thought. I'm particularly suspicious of anything that smacks of dogma, and so I'm lots of fun at parties, if anyone would ever invite me to one. There's radical fringe stuff out there that's just nuts. There are also a few mainstream ideas that I take exception with. But feminists aren't some hive mind, they argue with each other over this stuff. I know, I've seen them do it.



Gosh, so much wrong here as well.

1. It's really sad that you don't think that boys can enjoy playing with female action figures. I mean, that's not even anything new. One of my favorite Star Wars toys growing up was the Endor-version of Leia on a speeder bike, and that was more than 30 years ago.

Anyway, how do I know? Well, he smiled when he opened the present, and then started playing with it. He also got 2 different versions of Kylo Ren (one of which came with the starter kit). His brother got that same starter kit Kylo Ren, along with Finn & Poe. For this particular series of toys, there are several dozen male figures compared with fewer than 10 female figures, including multiple Leias (and I think that there might even be more anonymous imperial / first order guards & stormtroopers than named female characters). So, no need to feel alienated; strong manly young men like yourself still have plenty of testicle-sporting warriors to choose from to try to stave off the impending calamity of declining action figure sales. I mean, just look at the number of prominent force users we've seen during the course of 9 films:

Females: Rey, Leia (whose big force power reveal after 9 films was to ****ing float through space).

Males: Luke, Yoda, Obi-Wan, Qui-Gon, Anakin / Vader, Darth Maul, Count Dooku, Mace Windu, Palpatine, Snoke, & Kylo Ren.

So, 2 vs. 11 or 12 depending on whether or not you view Anakin and Vader as separate characters. And we've seen multiple male force users in every movie except Rogue One (where it's just Vader), but there have only been 2 films that have featured even one female character having force power.

And why should males be alienated because the hero is female, anyway? Strip away your misreading of the film, and there is no attack on maleness in the film. It it ok for boys to watch / like movies where the hero is female in your version of the world? And if not, why not? Maybe that says a lot more about you, and your hang-ups, than any supposed feminist agenda?

2. Also, I hate to break it to you, but the audience for Star Wars is not limited to young men (it's sexist to even say that, as if somehow the whims of young men take priority over those of young women, but you won't see it, so whatever). My teenage daughter and her friends are all proud geeks. They love Harry Potter, they adore Stranger Things, and they're obsessed with Star Wars. My daughter's favorite character: Kylo Ren. There were literal tears in her eyes over his choosing the dark side. Her big ask for x-mas? A build your own R2D2 kit.

What's more, I happen to work with hundreds of teenagers for a living. I think you'd be greatly surprised about their attitudes towards gender (and yes, even amongst the young men). For example, I know a bunch of 15 year old male Star Wars nerds that couldn't possibly care less that there were 2 female military leaders in TLJ.

I'm curious. What's your background, if you don't mind my asking? Age, martial status, kids, etc.? Again, asking sincerely.



It's logically incoherent to compare preferring watching men's pro sports to whining about (non-existent) excessive female representation in a movie. I don't watch much women's pro sports, but I don't have an issue with women's pro sports. In fact, I think it's awesome that there's a high level women's professional basketball league.

And I don't know if you're aware of this, but when you watch Star Wars, all of that military stuff is pretend. Those people are acting. Shocking, I know, but it's true. Last I checked, women can act just as well as men can. Meanwhile, despite what you might believe, feminists are not under the delusion that optimal female athletic performance is on par with optimal male athletic performance.

As for the implication that female military leaders / warriors are somehow unrealistic, you do know that there are female soldiers and generals fighting wars all across the globe, including tens of thousands of women serving in all-female combat units against ISIS, right?



No. No, they are most definitely not. As someone who's had no less than 6 family members serve in the military, including one female cousin, I find it astounding that someone could even believe that.



You may be a misogynist, but I have hope for you yet. But I doubt that the rest of the forum is at all interested in an extended exchange of encyclopedia-length posts on feminism, so if you'd like to continue, we could move to PMs.

And retire the sports thing. It's not the hammer that you think it is. It doesn't expose anyone's hypocrisy, it merely exposes that you have trouble making a coherent argument.



Dude. That's the thing that triggers you? A ****ing innocuous t-shirt?

See, you look at that t-shirt and see some nefarious feminist agenda. I look at that t-shirt and see some women celebrating the fact that after 40 years there's finally a female character with force powers.


I greatly appreciate your patience. Like you said: I'm pretty unwilling to go back and forth with this guy over and over, but I have loved reading your responses to these (yes) sexist posts.

I am a YouTuber on nerdy culture with a pretty decent following -- I mentioned in a video on my channel that people are upset at this make believe agenda and MAN were people pissed in the comments section...telling me the agenda TOTALLY exists and Star Wars is such crap now because of ladies doing stuff. (Take a guess what the main demo of my audience is?)

Just maddening.
 

Jtown

Registered User
Oct 6, 2010
39,619
19,685
Fairfax, Virginia
I greatly appreciate your patience. Like you said: I'm pretty unwilling to go back and forth with this guy over and over, but I have loved reading your responses to these (yes) sexist posts.

I am a YouTuber on nerdy culture with a pretty decent following -- I mentioned in a video on my channel that people are upset at this make believe agenda and MAN were people pissed in the comments section...telling me the agenda TOTALLY exists and Star Wars is such crap now because of ladies doing stuff. (Take a guess what the main demo of my audience is?)

Just maddening.

star wars is crap now but it has nothing to do with the Female actress. Rey to me is the most interesting star wars charachter for this new triology and it's not even close. They need to focus on her more and less on fen and poe who suck.
 

BrindamoursNose

Registered User
Oct 14, 2008
20,391
14,540
star wars is crap now but it has nothing to do with the Female actress. Rey to me is the most interesting star wars charachter for this new triology and it's not even close. They need to focus on her more and less on fen and poe who suck.

I disagree with Star Wars being crap, and actually that Rey is the most interesting (I think Kylo is most interesting by far), but Rey is quite good still.

Rey will get her due next film --- I don't believe for a second her parents were just junkers and has no special destiny.
 

Rebels57

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 28, 2014
78,078
125,485
New direction for this thread, here me out..

Ignore the pathetic comments by Ghost Beer.

They aren't worth the time it takes to read, let alone reply.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Umphreys Mcgee

mja

Everything was beautiful, and nothing hurt
Jan 7, 2005
12,738
29,442
Lucy the Elephant's Belly
star wars is crap now but it has nothing to do with the Female actress. Rey to me is the most interesting star wars charachter for this new triology and it's not even close. They need to focus on her more and less on fen and poe who suck.

I think Kylo Ren is hands down the most interesting character in the new films (the Anakin we should have had!), followed closely by the jaded Luke. Rey is definitely third for me though, and she's arguably the best protagonist the series has had, if only due to the fact that Daisy Ridley is a better actor than young Mark Hamill was.

I liked Finn quite a bit in TFA, mostly because of the chemistry between Ridley & Boyega. He's more of a secondary player here, but I didn't at all mind his subplot. It might have been somewhat unnecessary, but there was still a lot to like about it, including the development of a second love interest for Finn.

The films have struggled a bit with what to do with Poe. He was the third wheel in TFA. He has a much bigger role here, and I assume that if Carrie Fisher had lived we would have continued to see him become something akin to Leia's adopted son, which had a lot of tantalizing potential vis-a-vis Kylo Ren. I expect they'll still try to develop that, but it'll be a challenge without Fisher.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rebels57

TCTC

Registered User
Mar 25, 2013
13,344
9,765
Daisy Ridley and Adam Driver were pretty much the only reason this movie wasn't completely unwatchable. Great characters and very talented and charismatic actors.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Rage Kage

Rebels57

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 28, 2014
78,078
125,485
Daisy Ridley and Adam Driver were pretty much the only reason this movie wasn't completely unwatchable. Great characters and very talented and charismatic actors.

Agree with this part for sure.

I like both Poe and Finn quite a bit though. I am a little dissapointed that their plot to to shutdown the lightspeed tracking device ended up being all for nothing, but I think that Rian Johnson was making a deliberate point that not everything goes according to plan or makes a difference in war. That is a brave choice as a director. I personally would have rather seen it work but that the First Order still have found a different wack to track them to Crait anyway through some sort of backup plan, which would have meant the final showdown would have went unchanged.
 

TCTC

Registered User
Mar 25, 2013
13,344
9,765
Agree with this part for sure.

I like both Poe and Finn quite a bit though. I am a little dissapointed that their plot to to shutdown the lightspeed tracking device ended up being all for nothing, but I think that Rian Johnson was making a deliberate point that not everything goes according to plan or makes a difference in war. That is a brave choice as a director. I personally would have rather seen it work but that the First Order still have found a different wack to track them to Crait anyway through some sort of backup plan, which would have meant the final showdown would have went unchanged.
Yeah, I liked Finn and Poe much better in TFA.

I really liked TFA in general. I mean, we all know it's basically a reboot of ANH, but I'm totally fine with that. The humor in that movie was much more subtle, too. Just a clever and likeable movie. I can't say the same about TLJ, sadly.

I appreciate that they were taking some risks and it makes me feel kind of bad shitting all over the movie. But they failed miserably, imo. When I left the theatre after TFA, I was really looking forward to Episode VIII. They created such an interesting new universe with likeable characters and potential storylines.
Now I don't even care if there is an Episode IX...
 
Last edited:

RANKKA

Give Glaude the world
Apr 11, 2017
2,706
3,587
EU
saw it, liked it better than the previous one, but WHO THE f*** IS SNOKE?

also its just Rey huh? Ben last Skywalker? then he is my fav f.uck rey. I wish disney would have the balls to end star wars with Dark side winning lol
 
Feb 19, 2003
67,742
25,880
Concord, New Hampshire
saw it last night. thoughts:

I didnt mind the handling of the Skywalker character. He is bitter and feels responsible for seemingly everything crumbling around the resistance. I understand the argument that it is a letdown after what we knew of him in the old films. Maybe they could of handled it better, but I get the idea of why he wanted to be isolated from everything.

Had thoughts of Holdo being a First Order double agent early on after her entrance into the film. Especially her reluctance to tell Poe what was going on.

Wish we would of got some clarity on Snoke. Little frustrated with that. He did die a little to easy. someone who as powerful as him should not have died so quickly and been distracted and not feeling the power that Kylo Ren used to kill him This of course assuming he is dead and not giving the illusion of death to Rey and Kylo Ren.

Still dont know how Finn was able to fly that piece of junk that close to the ray that was melting the massive steel door and then Rose knocking him out of it

the sabre battle between Kylo Ren and Skywalker just pushed Kylo Rens rage and jealousy over the edge. I think they can make him out to be the supreme leader of the new order work. At the end of the day he wanted Snoke out of the way because he felt Snoke was holding him back of what he is capable of.

Overall I enjoyed it and thought it was a good. A few things did bug me, but no movie is made perfectly and without scenes that really dont make sense ot do not add anything.
would see it again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rebels57

BrindamoursNose

Registered User
Oct 14, 2008
20,391
14,540
saw it, liked it better than the previous one, but WHO THE **** IS SNOKE?

also its just Rey huh? Ben last Skywalker? then he is my fav f.uck rey. I wish disney would have the balls to end star wars with Dark side winning lol

Who was the Emperor in the old trilogy? We know just as much about him as we know about Snoke -- maybe even less. I know it drives people wild to not have theories answered definitively, but it shouldn't kill thoughts on the story because of it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rebels57

Drytoast

Registered User
Sep 27, 2017
6,578
4,785
There's really only one way to handle Fisher's passing, unfortunately. Leia is going to have an off-screen death. I expect that the first scene of Ep 9 will be a solemn state funeral of some kind befitting the passing of the leader of the resistance.

Not that I care enough to go watch 9 now...but the only set up this POS movie did was likely to have a very lengthy passage of time as the new wave of rebelion "grows up"

She could easily just die inbetween movies.
 

RANKKA

Give Glaude the world
Apr 11, 2017
2,706
3,587
EU
Who was the Emperor in the old trilogy? We know just as much about him as we know about Snoke -- maybe even less. I know it drives people wild to not have theories answered definitively, but it shouldn't kill thoughts on the story because of it.
wtf are you talking about? we know everything about him?
 

mja

Everything was beautiful, and nothing hurt
Jan 7, 2005
12,738
29,442
Lucy the Elephant's Belly
saw it last night. thoughts:

I didnt mind the handling of the Skywalker character. He is bitter and feels responsible for seemingly everything crumbling around the resistance. I understand the argument that it is a letdown after what we knew of him in the old films. Maybe they could of handled it better, but I get the idea of why he wanted to be isolated from everything.

The man I am loved what they did with Luke. The child inside hated it. Overall, I thought it worked really well, but am sad we didn't get to see Luke really being a badass with a lightsaber.

Wish we would of got some clarity on Snoke. Little frustrated with that. He did die a little to easy. someone who as powerful as him should not have died so quickly and been distracted and not feeling the power that Kylo Ren used to kill him This of course assuming he is dead and not giving the illusion of death to Rey and Kylo Ren.

the sabre battle between Kylo Ren and Skywalker just pushed Kylo Rens rage and jealousy over the edge. I think they can make him out to be the supreme leader of the new order work. At the end of the day he wanted Snoke out of the way because he felt Snoke was holding him back of what he is capable of.

This is something that some people have been complaining about but that I found extremely compelling. My read on it is that Snoke was supremely arrogant, and that Ren is able to use Snoke's own arrogance to blind him to what's going on. The pupil has now surpassed the master and is now the most powerful person in that room. It's foreshadowed by the Yoda line about masters being what their pupils grow beyond.

And I agree, in the throne room, Ren realizes that Snoke's holding him back and that's the primary reason he kills him - to seize power. I'm very much looking forward to seeing what they do with Ren as undisputed supreme leaders of the First Order.
 

mja

Everything was beautiful, and nothing hurt
Jan 7, 2005
12,738
29,442
Lucy the Elephant's Belly
wtf are you talking about? we know everything about him?

Not originally, we didn't. I didn't have a clue who the emperor really was for 2 decades. He was just the big bad that turned Anakin Skywalker to the dark side in some back story we only got the smallest pieces of.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rebels57

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad