rubikscube
Registered User
Stanley looked like our best d-man to me last night, I don't care what any statistics say about it lol
he is playing against fwd lines lower down the line-up.We keep waiting for Stanley to get exposed, didn't happen against the North Divisions two top teams!
If anything a couple of Jets top 4 D men got exposed!
Not sure if your point is he isn’t as good as we think, which he can only play the minutes he gets.he is playing against fwd lines lower down the line-up.
was curious who he out there against the last 2 games
View attachment 408166
View attachment 408167
Maurice is bringing him along how he should be.
Let him learn the position in the bigs on the 3rd pairing with limited time and semi-sheltered. If he continues on the upward curve, he will start playing against tougher competition.
I want to see him with some serious PK time because if we have Slamberg and Stan the Man on our PK1 and PK2 in a year or so, it will gove JMo more time in other areas.
Also, if he continues his upward trend and DD doesn't improve his game by the end of the season, I'm protecting him and exposing DD.
He needs to pk so there is no reason to bring boo boo back in.Maurice is bringing him along how he should be.
Let him learn the position in the bigs on the 3rd pairing with limited time and semi-sheltered. If he continues on the upward curve, he will start playing against tougher competition.
I want to see him with some serious PK time because if we have Slamberg and Stan the Man on our PK1 and PK2 in a year or so, it will gove JMo more time in other areas.
Also, if he continues his upward trend and DD doesn't improve his game by the end of the season, I'm protecting him and exposing DD.
They could do a swap back with Seattle to protect him especially with uncertainty in draft.I'm at that point right now, if for no other reason that we've only scratched the surface with Stanley, but we've already seen the ceiling on Demelo. Stanley as been extremely sound in all the fundamentals, but you can't coach someone to be 6'7''. He has potential to be a very unique force in this league for many years to come. Why in the world would we ever protect anybody other than Morrissey or Pionk over him is beyond me.
Not sure if your point is he isn’t as good as we think, which he can only play the minutes he gets.
If you are suggesting he should get a chance to play more and against a wider range which I agree with
Or if you generally were curious and it’s a huh moment. In that case, I’m not sure why you are surprised a rookie being sheltered.
If necessary. The bottom line is that I think the sky's the limit with this kid. He may not become Chara, but I've already been impressed with the way he moves the puck and his hockey sense at his age, size and experience level. Of all the defensemen we have to protect, I'd let any of our non-Pionk/Morrissey guys go at this point. Heck, there's no reason that Heinola couldn't step in now and take a spot from them (IMO).They could do a swap back with Seattle to protect him especially with uncertainty in draft.
He was the best d last night against the competition he was given the minutes he was given and the partner. Where he gets played and how much is coaching decisions not dictated by what the player is capable of.Who he plays against will help determine where he is in his development and if he is improving(which he clearly is doing). Not a complicated aspect. People were making hot takes like he was our best D while playing 12 mins a night and extremely sheltered. Now he’s given more free reign and responsibilities.
Not a bad read for a small town doctorIf necessary. The bottom line is that I think the sky's the limit with this kid. He may not become Chara, but I've already been impressed with the way he moves the puck and his hockey sense at his age, size and experience level. Of all the defensemen we have to protect, I'd let any of our non-Pionk/Morrissey guys go at this point. Heck, there's no reason that Heinola couldn't step in now and take a spot from them (IMO).
Agreed. I’ve thought for awhile now the Jets won’t risk losing Stanley. He has developed very nicely and the Jets have invested heavily in his development.I'm at that point right now, if for no other reason that we've only scratched the surface with Stanley, but we've already seen the ceiling on Demelo. Stanley as been extremely sound in all the fundamentals, but you can't coach someone to be 6'7''. He has potential to be a very unique force in this league for many years to come. Why in the world would we ever protect anybody other than Morrissey or Pionk over him is beyond me.
I also noticed that his skating is improving also , along with is confidence in his stick handling. A lot more hanging onto the puck and delaying. Instead off the boards or glass.We will not be losing Stanley in Xpansion, I can guarantee that.
You do not invest the assets, time and resources to obtain and develop a 6"7 project only to let it walk out the door right when he starts paying dividends.
As I said in another thread, I half believe that Maurice is sitting Stanley to hide him from the Seattle scouts. Maybe they'll find another unheralded defenseman on another team that they'd like more. I would be sooooooo disappointed if we lost him after all the development we put in and how far he has come.
Easy fix to that, protect Stanley. I doubt they take DeMelo. It would then be either Harkins or Berdin.
Harkins only needs to play the required games to help the Jets meet the minimum requirements for the expansion draft. He could still be selected by Seattle if he doesn’t play the required games and the Jets don’t protect him.Agree, but then they've got to start playing Harkins, at least for the 10 games he needs (there are other good reasons for playing him, of course).
Just curious at his matchups that is all.Not sure if your point is he isn’t as good as we think, which he can only play the minutes he gets.
If you are suggesting he should get a chance to play more and against a wider range which I agree with
Or if you generally were curious and it’s a huh moment. In that case, I’m not sure why you are surprised a rookie being sheltered.