Again, did I say they were sure to be worse? All I have said is I believe Colorado can beat them with a healthy roster that doesn't succumb to the most random of absences like a sliced knee or a cocaine addict.
Team can be built around those guys all they want, fact is Hintz gets hurt basically every year, Robertson was disappointing in the playoffs, and Harley was behind Lindell/Tanev in terms of responsibilities.
We can talk all we want about continuous progress - it's not always continuous. For all we know Stankoven/Harley/Bourque run into a wall next season and all of a sudden Dallas is relying on Johnston/Heiskanen + an older group of skaters.
Colorado has the three best players on either team, or three of the four if you think Heiskanen > Rantanen. Let's see how the rest of Colorado's roster looks before we anoint Dallas the big bad boogeymen like everyone did for Vegas this past season.
I think it is implied and probably our significant difference. To me, it was very clear the Stars were better than the Avs this year. Both teams lost important pieces in the series in Hintz and Nuke. You push Hintz's injury that it happens every year and should be assumed to happen. While Nuke's coke issues are discounted and shouldn't be assumed to happen.
The way I see it, the Stars were simply better than the Avs this season. This series showed that pretty clearly IMO. Now as we are making forward looking statements here, the cap situation all but guarantees the Avs are taking a step back. Nuke is probably the sacrificial limb, but if it isn't him, it'll be some other high dollar player. Beyond Nuke though, the Avs have their own depth issues to work through. From Landy questions to losing Drouin/Walker to losing leadership.
I simply don't see how the Avs really improve over the summer. Any outcome is likely a team that is a step or two back from this year's team that was clearly worse than the Stars already. So my deduction is for the Avs to be clearly the better team when healthy, the Stars have to take a large step back.
Development clearly isn't linear, and the Stars have their own challenges next year. Johnston could stagnate or struggle as he takes on a bigger role. He could also blossom into the 40g-50a high end two way guy he looks like. I'm not saying the Stars are the best team, but they are a notch above currently and face less challenges this summer. That's not zero challenges, but less. Their path to sustaining is a lot clearer than the Avs.
I think Miro is better than Rants, but even with that, having the top players is no guarantee to being the top team. Edmonton has had 2 of the top 5 players for the last 6-7 years and this is the year they finally found success. Vegas, Washington, and St Louis won Cups without elite players (Ovi is the only one and I think he was out of the top 5 and probably out of the top 10). As much as I like Barkov, I don't think he is a top 10 player (nor is Cheese). You can build a winner without the very elite players. It clearly helps to have elite players, but you need certain positions to be held and if you don't have an elite player, you need depth (arguably need depth anyway).