Stamkos is cooked

Another Empty Netter

Registered User
Jan 14, 2011
437
328
You don't care about how transactions happen, I do. Cool. When we start watching robots I will probably change my opinion. For me, thinking of the players on the ice as real people with real emotions draws me to watch more than the box score.
The days when players would spend a long time on one team are looong gone
 

ryan callahan

Registered User
Jan 25, 2014
2,190
2,049
Québec,Canada
Being a neutral player at 5v5 despite getting extremely favorable usage and zone starts while being terrible on the powerplay doesn't scream quality NHL player. Maybe I exaggerated. Right now he could be a decent 3rd liner against lower comp.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

JPT

Registered User
Jul 4, 2024
966
1,870
7 points in last 7 games for Stamkos. Seems he and the team are doing better as of late.
Trotz and Co are so bad they can't even tank right

At Stamkos' current level of play he should be thankful he is in the NHL because if his name was John Doe and he had no credentials he'd be grinding away for the Admirals right now.
Now I'm just picturing anonymous, presumably witness protection Stamkos (probably wearing an eye patch and fake nose) skating around as John Doe.
 

Matty Sundin

Registered User
Jul 18, 2006
4,268
4,546
He’s going in the wrong side of 30, won his cups which was recently, is a future hall of famer, has his one last pay cheque, body has been destroyed the last decade, and probably has nothing play for anymore to get motivated easily. Of course he’s gonna decline and not give anything extra consistently if he could or wanted to. Saying he’s cooked would mean he’s incompetent though. I wouldn’t say he’s at that stage yet, he’s still an NHL player. He’s just in the twilight of his career now which happens to every player.
 
Last edited:

CupsOverCash

Registered User
Jun 16, 2009
16,547
7,321
Turns out Brisebois offer was fair.
My thoughts. He's done a great job as a gm. He made the right move by not extending stamkos but at the same time i think he could have done a better job handling the situation. As you can see lot of fans are rightfully upset by how he treated stamkos who has been a class act as far as a franchise player goes. Maybe you don't want to do that next time. However he made the right moves on this as far as I'm concerned. I'm curious if he'd put a small offer out there stamkos would take that over the deal he got in nashville. I don't think stamkos is getting that deal anywhere else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PM88RU and Rschmitz

DarrylshutzSydor

Registered User
Aug 9, 2007
3,620
1,442
California
My thoughts. He's done a great job as a gm. He made the right move by not extending stamkos but at the same time i think he could have done a better job handling the situation. As you can see lot of fans are rightfully upset by how he treated stamkos who has been a class act as far as a franchise player goes. Maybe you don't want to do that next time. However he made the right moves on this as far as I'm concerned. I'm curious if he'd put a small offer out there stamkos would take that over the deal he got in nashville. I don't think stamkos is getting that deal anywhere else.
They offered him a $24mil deal. Looks like it was probably more than fair.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Hockey Tonk Man

CupsOverCash

Registered User
Jun 16, 2009
16,547
7,321
They offered him a $24mil deal. Looks like it was probably more than fair.
For sure but that's not the point. Before they didn't offer anything it sounds like. That can rub a player like him and others like him on that level, the wrong way and how that looked back then can stay in their minds more than what actually unfolded. You see what I'm saying? There's a right way to handle things and I think bolts fans can probably come across as complaining about this maybe too much with the teams we've been able to ice over last decade or so. I think it's just asking for more professional way of going about it. I don't think that's too much to ask and it does make your organization look better. They've been fine tho. They know what they're doing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rschmitz

FreeToShareWithMeOk

Registered User
Dec 28, 2024
29
27
They offered him a $24mil deal. Looks like it was probably more than fair.

Lol no, Stamkos is not a 3 mil per year player anywhere let alone in Tampa. If they gave him 4.5-5 per they'd likely have been better off with him than JG at 9 per as they'd have 4 mil to spend elsewhere and Stamkos was dialed into their system and their locker room.
 

creg

Registered User
Dec 25, 2024
9
4
Lol no, Stamkos is not a 3 mil per year player anywhere let alone in Tampa. If they gave him 4.5-5 per they'd likely have been better off with him than JG at 9 per as they'd have 4 mil to spend elsewhere and Stamkos was dialed into their system and their locker room.
I don't think you'll find many dialed in Tampa fans who would prefer Stamkos + a 4.5 mil player over Guentzel at this point. Stamkos' "issue" was never that he couldn't score, it was that he gets completely caved in whenever he's on the ice (which seems to be true of this season as well).

Our biggest weakness last season was our 5v5 play, allocating a big portion of our cap to a player whose primary use is to score on the powerplay would not be logical (and this is assuming that his salary request of 4.5 is even accurate). If we had a deep enough forward core that we could shelter him that would be one thing, but Guentzel makes far more sense for this roster and the results speak for themselves.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stelio Kontos

Rschmitz

Finding new ways to cheat
Feb 27, 2002
17,534
10,054
Tampa Bay
I don't think you'll find many dialed in Tampa fans who would prefer Stamkos + a 4.5 mil player over Guentzel at this point. Stamkos' "issue" was never that he couldn't score, it was that he gets completely caved in whenever he's on the ice (which seems to be true of this season as well).

Our biggest weakness last season was our 5v5 play, allocating a big portion of our cap to a player whose primary use is to score on the powerplay would not be logical (and this is assuming that his salary request of 4.5 is even accurate). If we had a deep enough forward core that we could shelter him that would be one thing, but Guentzel makes far more sense for this roster and the results speak for themselves.

Guentzel has been awesome, certainly an upgrade, but 5-6m(the rumored asking price) better is debatable.

The production/cap isn’t being second guessed though from what I can tell.
 

Armourboy

Hey! We suck!
Jan 20, 2014
21,304
13,575
Shelbyville, TN
Guentzel has been awesome, certainly an upgrade, but 5-6m(the rumored asking price) better is debatable.

The production/cap isn’t being second guessed though from what I can tell.
Honestly Stamkos vs Guentzel shouldn't even really be an argument. If he was asking for 4 and they were offering 3 you can't tell me a GM can't get creative and find that extra million over the course of a season.

The 3 million a season was simply offered as a way for Tampa to say " we tried" even though everyone else in the hockey world knows they didn't. It was offered simply to create a narrative that could be used but has little to no truth in it.

One vs the other was never a thing, they could have likely had both but the GM didn't want Stamkos so he just made him an offer he knew he wouldn't take. Whether its hockey or any other form of business these BS " offers " are done for the same reason.

Now as far as Nashville goes, had he been making 4-5 rather than 8, most of us would be pretty happy atm. He's been worth the 4-5 this season, so anyone saying he isn't still an NHL caliber player is just trolling at this point. A top player in the league he isn't, AHL fodder he isn't either.
 

Rschmitz

Finding new ways to cheat
Feb 27, 2002
17,534
10,054
Tampa Bay
Honestly Stamkos vs Guentzel shouldn't even really be an argument. If he was asking for 4 and they were offering 3 you can't tell me a GM can't get creative and find that extra million over the course of a season.

The 3 million a season was simply offered as a way for Tampa to say " we tried" even though everyone else in the hockey world knows they didn't. It was offered simply to create a narrative that could be used but has little to no truth in it.

One vs the other was never a thing, they could have likely had both but the GM didn't want Stamkos so he just made him an offer he knew he wouldn't take. Whether its hockey or any other form of business these BS " offers " are done for the same reason.

Now as far as Nashville goes, had he been making 4-5 rather than 8, most of us would be pretty happy atm. He's been worth the 4-5 this season, so anyone saying he isn't still an NHL caliber player is just trolling at this point. A top player in the league he isn't, AHL fodder he isn't either.

Nicely summed up
 

Gillings

Registered User
Jan 19, 2013
3,953
2,426
Tough to see an all-time great goal scorer age and fall of the map like this, but it never ceases to amaze me that teams pay their management millions to make easy-to-predict mistakes like Nashville did. A fan can do a better job for free.
Sometimes you need to take the risk. A player like stamkos is a potentially MONEY maker for your team. If he fell off a cliff well, I’m sure the ticket and jersey sales helped to recover the cost.

It’s his first year in Nashville.
 

WTFMAN99

Registered User
Jun 17, 2009
34,317
12,474
22 pts in 36GP isn't bad production, it's about a 50 point pace.

It's bad production relative to the contract though, I think if Stamkos was pulling around $5M per, there is less flack coming his way.
 

bov

Registered User
Nov 13, 2010
7,444
3,629
I have been watching people say Stamkos is done at various points for the last 5+ years, there comes a time every season where this same conversation takes place. I know the numbers are down but that was to be expected with such a drastic change. Unsurprisingly, he is starting to put up more points as the games go on.

Maybe he is what he is, but it's not like there was some sudden dropoff in ability. This conversation is nothing new with Stamkos and it's only magnified because of the contract drama and change of scenery. Say what you want about the player but he is as resilient as it gets, consummate pro, and has pretty much always found a way to bounce back and produce while being a great leader. Give him some time.
 

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
56,431
94,414
Vancouver, BC
I have been watching people say Stamkos is done at various points for the last 5+ years, there comes a time every season where this same conversation takes place. I know the numbers are down but that was to be expected with such a drastic change. Unsurprisingly, he is starting to put up more points as the games go on.

Maybe he is what he is, but it's not like there was some sudden dropoff in ability. This conversation is nothing new with Stamkos and it's only magnified because of the contract drama and change of scenery. Say what you want about the player but he is as resilient as it gets, consummate pro, and has pretty much always found a way to bounce back and produce while being a great leader. Give him some time.

In 21-22 - which is basically 2.5 years ago - he scored 106 points including 70 ES points.

In 24-25 he's on pace for 45 points and 25 ESP.

There has been a *massive* dropoff in ability. His skating and motor are completely broken and he just can't get to the places he needs to to score at ES anymore, and is a liability tracking the play back defensively.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vector

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad