Patrice Bergeron has been on one Stanley Cup winning team in his entire career. If the key was playing a strong two-way game like these guys always say wouldn’t that have manifested itself in more championships.
Or reality is it isn’t easy to win championships & there isn’t really an exact formula. Just try to build the best teams you can & hope for some luck. So making narratives based around that isn’t really wise.
There is not a formula but certain things imo make it easier.
There’s a pro and con to it all.
Two way players are “better” because they ply both sides of the ice. If their ability starts and ends with being able to play both sides that’s an issue. If they don’t do anything past that particularly well, congrats you have a third liner or a good fourth liner.
If they have either stellar offense of defense and can play both sides, congrats you have Bergeron or coots.
If they play one side so/so, you have a third or fourth liner, maaaybe a second liner.
If they specialize in offense, you have a first or second liner, and specialize in defense you have a defenseman.
Chasing every player to play both sides hurts you in any lack of specialization.
Ignoring players that play both sides hurts your fluidity.
You have to either find the happy medium there or also know what your weakness are are AND know how to not just hide but over coach them.
Well, this is the same organization that gift wrapped a coaching career to a guy who blocked a shot with his face. You don't get more intangibly than that.
I do appreciate that they gave him a job and have no doubts that in this current staffing environment, it would never happen. I also think that it did not need to be that job.