Hanover Fist
Registered User
Would the so on include putting them on your hotdog?Chocolate covered raisins are great, raisins in certain cakes and cookies, raisins in oatmeal, and so on.
Just not meatballs.
Would the so on include putting them on your hotdog?Chocolate covered raisins are great, raisins in certain cakes and cookies, raisins in oatmeal, and so on.
Just not meatballs.
Not that kind of sandwich, specifically, but I’ve seen people put raisins in chicken salad sandwiches!Would the so on include putting them on your hotdog?
Also pretty common salad or trail mix additiveNot that kind of sandwich, specifically, but I’ve seen people put raisins in chicken salad sandwiches!
Ugh, someone on my Facebook feed shared a Fox News post about Torts telling his players they won't play if they don't stand for the National Anthem and his post was just about how "the Flyers are back!" thanks to the toughness of Torts.
I'm not as anti-Torts as most of you folks are, but assuming Torts even said that, loving the flag certainly has nothing to do with the reason the Flyers are playing well.
Myrtetus actually makes a good point. Unfortunately, it's not the one he's trying to make. The hockey community by and large has no interest in teaching anyone about the game. It's more about indoctrination into the culture.
Go try to find tactical hockey content. There isn't much of it out there. You've got Jack Han and The Coaches Site and you're pretty much done outside of a random Twitter account or two. Meanwhile, I pay money to support a blog about the bleeping Indiana Pacers because it teaches me so much about the mechanics of NBA basketball.
That’s because only maybe 0.01% of the hockey community even understands the sport.Myrtetus actually makes a good point. Unfortunately, it's not the one he's trying to make. The hockey community by and large has no interest in teaching anyone about the game. It's more about indoctrination into the culture.
That’s because only maybe 0.01% of the hockey community even understands the sport.
And I don’t even mean advanced knowledge of tactics or anything in-depth. I’m talking like the most basic common sense things. You go on Flyers Twitter or Reddit or anywhere else where fans gather and they still think Deslauriers is vital and Frost is shit because he’s too small and bad defensively.
Even if the 0.1% of the above 0.01%, who actually know enough to teach others something of value, was motivated to do make teaching content, it still wouldn’t work because there’s zero appetite for that content and the majority of fans would actively push back against it because it disagrees with people like Torts.
Man I wonder if any of the beat writers would even get this reference.Hockey “personalities” barely understand the intricacies of hockey — at least the ones who pretend that hockey is more mysticism for the chosen than sport. It’s not even because hockey is hard to understand. It’s because they prefer the look of cave shadows. The cave shadows have size and you can’t teach size!
I think basketball intricacies are more complex. That’s why coaches have greater impacts. You’re halfway to being a hockey analyst when you learn what “north-south” means.
I’m not sure hockey fans even know there’s a puck sometimesBrother, there are still people saying shit like "There's only one basketball!" or talking about NFL teams' records when they run the ball 30+ times. That's just sports as a broad issue.
I heard a fun exchange at the Bears game last night (mostly because the guy in front of me loves having intermission conversations directly over my old man and myself with the guy that sits directly behind us):That’s because only maybe 0.01% of the hockey community even understands the sport.
And I don’t even mean advanced knowledge of tactics or anything in-depth. I’m talking like the most basic common sense things. You go on Flyers Twitter or Reddit or anywhere else where fans gather and they still think Deslauriers is vital and Frost is shit because he’s too small and bad defensively.
Even if the 0.1% of the above 0.01%, who actually know enough to teach others something of value, was motivated to make teaching content, it still wouldn’t work because there’s zero appetite for that stuff and the majority of fans would actively push back against it because it disagrees with people like Torts.
Myrtetus actually makes a good point. Unfortunately, it's not the one he's trying to make. The hockey community by and large has no interest in teaching anyone about the game. It's more about indoctrination into the culture.
Go try to find tactical hockey content. There isn't much of it out there. You've got Jack Han and The Coaches Site and you're pretty much done outside of a random Twitter account or two. Meanwhile, I pay money to support a blog about the bleeping Indiana Pacers because it teaches me so much about the mechanics of NBA basketball.