They’re not signing Tippett to a surplus value. In fact, they’re going to sign him to the exact opposite.
They’re not signing Tippett to a surplus value. In fact, they’re going to sign him to the exact opposite.
They’re not signing Tippett to a surplus value. In fact, they’re going to sign him to the exact opposite.
Wait so you’re telling me that shooting at a much higher % than the rest of his career WASNT sustainable?!?Damn who could have predicted stagnation for Tippett
I'm as shocked as you areWait so you’re telling me that shooting at a much higher % than the rest of his career WASNT sustainable?!?
Holy shit. How could we not have seen this coming?????
The Village Idiots called a meeting
No doubt this is the way the team views Frost as well. And on one hand, I get it. You want to see him involved in the play consistently. They see a smaller framed player and think, this guy needs to be Theo Fleury to be successful in the NHL. I'll fully admit that at times Frost is not as involved as I would like to see him, particularly given his offensive ability. However, even when he's being a passive player, I think positively impacts the game with his sound defensive play and small-but-effective puck plays.
Other side of this coin is that they are actively asking him to play a game that he's never played, and quite honestly, not suited to play. He's not the high energy guy - the TK/Atkinson type. He's methodical, and plays a very specific type of game. Just give him decent linemates who can extend plays for 1/2 the season and see what happens...Just like they did year, and he performed like a 2nd line center. They can't get out of their own way.
View attachment 798720
No doubt this is the way the team views Frost as well. And on one hand, I get it. You want to see him involved in the play consistently. They see a smaller framed player and think, this guy needs to be Theo Fleury to be successful in the NHL. I'll fully admit that at times Frost is not as involved as I would like to see him, particularly given his offensive ability. However, even when he's being a passive player, I think positively impacts the game with his sound defensive play and small-but-effective puck plays.
Other side of this coin is that they are actively asking him to play a game that he's never played, and quite honestly, not suited to play. He's not the high energy guy - the TK/Atkinson type. He's methodical, and plays a very specific type of game. Just give him decent linemates who can extend plays for 1/2 the season and see what happens...Just like they did the second half of last season, and he performed like a 2nd line center. They can't get out of their own way.
View attachment 798720
They’re all full of shit.WTF is Joe Watson doing? Remember when we were told all the old guys were no longer going to have a say when the new regime rolled in?
WTF is Joe Watson doing? Remember when we were told all the old guys were no longer going to have a say when the new regime rolled in?
Even if he doesn't have any say, which I doubt if he has any say it's anything substantial, it's still the way the Flyers seem to operate. It's still that type of hockey they are attempting to emulate. They hired an out-dated coach who has said he doesn't know how to coach offense. The coach they brought in to coach the powerplay attempted to fight players in previous coaching roles. Torts has a history of not giving the undersized, non-physical, offensively-oriented player a fair shot (Zuc and Karlsson). My guess is that Torts thought these two players were not physical enough. They just don't get it.Flyers alumni shows up at Ed Snider Night and talks about the team with the Flyers Alumni content manager.
Hardly "having a say"
Even if he doesn't have any say, which I doubt if he has any say it's anything substantial, it's still the way the Flyers seem to operate. It's still that type of hockey they are attempting to emulate. They hired an out-dated coach who has said he doesn't know how to coach offense. The coach they brought in to coach the powerplay attempted to fight players in previous coaching roles. Torts has a history of not giving the undersized, non-physical, offensively-oriented player a fair shot (Zuc and Karlsson). My guess is that Torts thought these two players were not physical enough. They just don't get it.
I understand, I didn't mean to make it sound like you were okay with the treatment of Frost (which by the way, while I talked about Frost, my point was about the overall direction/leadership of the team, using Frost as an example).I'm not disagreeing, I've been just as annoyed as the rest of this board has been with Tort's treatment of Frost.
I just think it's laughable and pure HFBoards paranoia to think that an old-school alumni, who has never even been a part of Flyers management (i.e, he's not even a shadowy all-powerful figure behind the scenes like Holmgren or Clarke might be), who showed up to an old-school alumni event, talking with the Alumni content manager, who made a comment on the topic du jour of his favorite team, is somehow indicative of "having a say" with the team.