VladDrag
Registered User
- Feb 6, 2018
- 6,375
- 16,218
It wasn't that bad, he stated the facts pretty well. The fact is that Rasmus did have a good year in all xG metrics. But it was all based on his defensive metrics. For example, he was in the 94th percentile for total defense according to EH's model for this season. He hasn't been above the 30th in his last 5 seasons, and been as low as 4th percentile. I've said this before, I don't fully believe that the dataset used to determine defensive impact is particularly great at completing that objective, but I'll certainly recognize that Rasmus was much better defensively this year, the question is, just how much. I don't really know. I'm willing to bet he just got lucky and you'll see a regression, which he states the same thing.Knowing full well I'm going to get triggered, I'm going to read this. I'll report back.
The only thing I'll add is that the article felt too optimistic. It just had a, 'what if he's changed' type feel to it.