No. Just being honest.
True. Sweden had it easy until the semis.... no doubt.
Canada with stamkos and Giroux and it would be 10 0 every game
Rask didn't play that game, did he? Out with the flu..
USA, Latvia and Norway lost with less than SwedenAnd Canada was closer to winning this game 6-0 that Sweden was to score. Sweden had such an easy way except for the semi where Rask didnt play.
No.
The U.S. played 3 top teams - Russia, Canada, Finland. If it wasn't for a $10 goal peg, they would have lost all 3.
It's weird and seems needy and insecure. You're trying to hard--and, worse, you've become tedious.
Sweden, obviously. What kind of question is that.
Canada with stamkos and Giroux and it would be 10 0 every game
i give up.
norway and latvia is better than sweden.
Canada with Stamkos and Giroux at the 2013 WC: no medal. Oops...
Don't bring logic to a rant![]()
I'm sorry you feel that way. Anyway, don't fault me for being honest.
you're sorry, and then say you're being honest? If I believed you were the type, Kevy, who understood irony, that would be brilliant. But you're not, and it isn't. Try again little man.
They didn't look "horrible" against Canada. They only lost by one goal! And they put up considerably more of a fight against Canada than anyone else did.
That's what really counts here. It's obvious Canada was the class of the tournament here, and that everybody facing them was going to bring their best effort no matter what.
The Americans did that better than anyone.