Confirmed with Link: - Sharks trade Eklund, Halttunen and Svoboda to Ottawa for 9th overall. | Page 15 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Confirmed with Link: Sharks trade Eklund, Halttunen and Svoboda to Ottawa for 9th overall.

  • If you are having issues logging in, we have found opening the log in page in a new tab/window rather than using the pop out should resolve these issues. We are working to get this resolved and thank you for patience.
  • Due to the increased volume of league transactions, the Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk section is temporarily restricted to where threads may only be started by moderators and sponsors. We anticipate that this restriction will be lifted some time after the first round of the draft.
I don’t think drafting a player just based on how his value will be when you trade him will be is the way to think of it. At 2 we should be looking for a player to play his prime years in teal. I think looking at the possibility of trading Reid because he will have good value means he “busts” cuz if he doesn’t bust and is a 1D like so many here seem to think he will be, why would we move him
I’m not saying to draft him because of his value if you trade him. I’m saying the extremely high value of mediocre defensemen mitigates the risk of Reid not panning out, which makes him more valuable than Stenberg.
 
Buffalo got way more than I'd have been comfortable giving up so kudos to them and lol to Chicago. Their GM is an incompetent fool.
Rising cap has allowed good teams to retain/aquire high end talent. Its going continue to inflate the trade market. Teams like Det are going to find the old school way of patience with a prospect pool will bite them when players get fed up and ask to leave. Its the same arguments when everyone went ape about UFAs being overpaid eating cap space.
 
To play devil’s advocate… If anything, isn’t this even more of a reason to take Reid at #2? If a decent 25 year old middle pairing LHD with average size, little defensive value, and only one more year on a contract that will probably pay him eight figures annually can return a 4th overall pick, it seems like even if Reid doesn’t hit his upside he’d be more valuable than Stenberg.
Even if it is a reason and the logic tracks, it's a MAJOR signal that Grier is taking a forward.

But if chicago knew that, they must feel that whatever dman is available wont be as good as Byram.

Seems like only they feel that way lolol
 
Ok, who on the sharks roster right now brings anything close to their skills? What is the biggest need on this team
That's not the point of what was said, not by me and not by you

You said Grier once again missed his opportunity to add a #1D because of the events of the day, a day where ZERO #1D men were moved

Of course we need D men, everyone knows it, that doesn't mean it's a bad decision not to overpay for marginal talent at a position of need just because there are limited options available, ESPECIALLY for a team that isn't at all desperate for immediate on-ice improvement due to being a roster built around a literal 20 year old
 
I understand that that is the price. The market is in a talent crunch for defensemen.

It is just not a price I would have paid, given the state of the roster.
How is keeping the 9th overall pick and drafting a defenseman who may never be as good as Byram, and will take minimum 3 probably 5 years to even establish himself in the NHL, better for the Sharks?
 
How is keeping the 9th overall pick and drafting a defenseman who may never be as good as Byram, and will take minimum 3 probably 5 years to even establish himself in the NHL, better for the Sharks?

Yea I would have done #9 and #27 easily but obviously Chicago paid more

I am not sure how I feel about #2 - depends on how the scouts value the pick I suppose because I trust them more than me 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: coooldude

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad