I’m pretty sure they need to make their moves before going long term or bridge.Garrioch thinks this negotiation is gonna last until September and the teams aren’t close. Also mentioned that Pinto’s agent is hoping for an offer sheet but Bruce doesn’t think he’ll get one. Says they would match it and also doesn’t think Pinto will get traded, Boston and other teams were told no when they asked for him.
8 mil?Already set a bad precedent, now everyone wants to get that 8 mill contract off their 50 point career highs.
They can hope for it but not really relevant with a new regime in town that weren't the ones handing them out.Already set a bad precedent, now everyone wants to get that 8 mill contract off their 50 point career highs.
Saw the LoS pod earlier, Bruce was on and made it sound like this could easily go into the season and not to expect an agreement anytime soon. Missing Norris makes that scenario so much worse for the team.
Yeah, they need more clarity about the room they'll have under the cap, and the clarity will come after Chychrun and Joseph are dealt with, and hopefully the top 4 RD is signed, not to mention the forwards we need to replace Tarasenko and Kubalik with. Then they can see if they have room for a long term contract with Pinto or just a bridge deal.One thing you have to consider is that this is the first big internal contract Staios will have to sign. It's one thing to go out and overpay to attract mercenaries like Tanev or Ullmark, but for better or worse the Pinto contract will be the first contract to set an ongoing salary structure with players who are already part of the team, and expectations over how Staios operates.
While I think Dorion's "you get 8M, you get 8M, you get 8M" was more positive than negative when the consider the value of Stutzle, Tkachuk, and Sanderson (so far), it's an example of a salary structure shaping expectations for what the floor is with players who are at a certain level.
I also wonder because of the above, how much of it is for show. As in, maybe he likes Pinto at 5M, but he wants to make him have to sacrifice and grind to get it because he doesn't want the perception to be that he will roll over and give a player with 1.5 actual full seasons under his belt relatively big money.
Lastly, they shouldn't sign Pinto right away anyways, because there are so many moving parts whose rights they do not yet hold, and they own Pinto's rights. If they sign him to a 5x5 type deal now, they can't come back a week from now and say "Tanev wants to sign but it's gonna cost us a few hundred k extra, can we switch to a bridge deal?" The contract is signed. Meaning that if the same contract is going to be on the table a month from now, it makes sense to wait and see how the cap structure of the team shakes out, because there is a real possibility that they simply won't have the space to go long-term regardless of whether they want to. At least that way, they get some social capital within the team. It's not they would have rolled over because they couldn't, it's they grinded Pinto down to a bridge deal because they are tough negotiators.
no need to overpay for Pinto. Probably a 2C i also wouldnt give him long term unless the cap is a steal.
bridge him at a lower cap if needed
Agreed. There are potentially quite a few options for signing new players (e.g., top 4 RD, 4th line C, etc.) so delaying the signing of Pinto would provide some flexibility going through the summer. Signing RFA players to longer term contracts at higher than necessary AAVs might be a cost-saving strategy if the player's performance meets or exceeds expectations in the longer run; however, it could also result in costs that exceed his value. Not all RFA contracts need to be longer term; some must be shorter term and lower value.One thing you have to consider is that this is the first big internal contract Staios will have to sign. It's one thing to go out and overpay to attract mercenaries like Tanev or Ullmark, but for better or worse the Pinto contract will be the first contract to set an ongoing salary structure with players who are already part of the team, and expectations over how Staios operates.
While I think Dorion's "you get 8M, you get 8M, you get 8M" was more positive than negative when the consider the value of Stutzle, Tkachuk, and Sanderson (so far), it's an example of a salary structure shaping expectations for what the floor is with players who are at a certain level.
I also wonder because of the above, how much of it is for show. As in, maybe he likes Pinto at 5M, but he wants to make him have to sacrifice and grind to get it because he doesn't want the perception to be that he will roll over and give a player with 1.5 actual full seasons under his belt relatively big money.
Lastly, they shouldn't sign Pinto right away anyways, because there are so many moving parts whose rights they do not yet hold, and they own Pinto's rights. If they sign him to a 5x5 type deal now, they can't come back a week from now and say "Tanev wants to sign but it's gonna cost us a few hundred k extra, can we switch to a bridge deal?" The contract is signed. Meaning that if the same contract is going to be on the table a month from now, it makes sense to wait and see how the cap structure of the team shakes out, because there is a real possibility that they simply won't have the space to go long-term regardless of whether they want to. At least that way, they get some social capital within the team. It's not they would have rolled over because they couldn't, it's they grinded Pinto down to a bridge deal because they are tough negotiators.
Middlestat 3 x 5.75. Pinto would be a fair bit lower on a 2 yearHas the market been set for middle six centers yet this offseason? Have any signed yet?
Pinto better sign for below $4 million on a 3 year deal. Mittelstadt was the only not shit forward in Buffalo's top 6 last year and was excelling on each end of the ice for a few seasons before signing his current deal.Middlestat 3 x 5.75. Pinto would be a fair bit lower on a 2 year
Bruce (washed) now saying Staios may be looking for 5 or 6 years.