All the "Luck has nothing to do with it" people seem to flip flop a lot. Like you stated...a one-off game like NFL has much more luck involved than a series does. So if we consistently lose series...it can't be luck...and if it's not luck..what is it? Not being prepared? Not having a good leader? Having an imbalanced team make-up?
1. I think you need to be good to be lucky. Being good means you are in a position to take advantage of such luck.
2. From eye tests, they were more prepared than they were over the past two seasons. Just look at the way they start the games in this series and compare that to against the Habs and BJs.
3. JT is not a leader. He is not vocal and demand enough to be a leader. Keefe is also not a good leader. I like that he defends his players but he made bad decisions at the most critical times. It goes back to dressing AJ in Game 5 against BJs where AJ didn't play for months. OR playing Sandin against the Habs after leading the Series 3-1 and just demolished them the game before. Which leads to the following point.
4. Keefe still have not figure out how to implement AM, Willie, JT and MM to maximize the chances of winning.
This could be b/c they want to please AM and MM in order for him to boast up his stats but to me, Winning the Cup matters. During PP, they pass way too much, is it bc they are waiting and setting AM as the trigger man or just looking for the perfect shot. You look at TB, when Point, Kuch, Stamkos or Hedman see a chance, they just shoot. Lets not kid ourselves, those four are staying and if they are staying Keefe still have not find a way to spread them out and see what they can do. Spread them out, and stick with it for more than a game or two.
We see that we need balance scoring and since we can't sign quality mid 6 forwards due to the cap, spread the guys out and let them carry the others instead of always playing them together.
You don't think that giving JT $11M had anything to do with the young guns asking for the moon? How could it not. I do know that If we kept Lou just until all the deals were done with the kids and THEN handed the reigns off to Dubas we would be in a much better spot. I didn't like a lot of stuff that Lou did..but I guarantee you they would not have signed those deals had he been around.
Honestly, they can ask for it but it doesn't mean Dubas needs to give in. Like I said, AM's caphit will be between Eichel and McD even if Lou is still around.
Lou will eventually sign Willie instead of trading him away b/c I think Willie's camp will bend at the end due to the diff being around 0.5mil.
Lou handling MM's contract would be interesting.