Mike8
Registered User
- Jun 24, 2002
- 13,381
- 1,752
Habs fans actually think they have a better defense than us.
I'd probably give the Rangers the edge, but I don't think it's laughable.
Habs fans actually think they have a better defense than us.
Right, because proper spelling is directly correlated to the accuracy of a scouting report. Glad we cleared that up.
Motivation is a big part of any team's success. The Canadiens talked a lot about finally earning respect from the Bruins. That's the big bully that never gave them the time of day. They used that for motivation to come together as a team and play that much harder. The Rangers had a similar phenomenon when a player on their team suffered a tragedy.
They're a relatively inexperienced team going this far into the playoffs who doesn't have the emotional motivation that they had against the Bruins.
Well, it's tougher to take someone seriously if they struggle with things like that, no? If I say I watch the Ragners 20-30 times a season and insist that they're called the Ragners, you'd find it a little peculiar, I'd imagine.
I don't think this is relevant. You yourself mentioned the Rangers don't have any emotional motivation against the Canadiens, while the club did against the Penguins. It ought to work the same way.
The last time they faced each other, 96. Montreal won the first two games in New York, but the Rangers won the next four games.Have we ever beaten habs in playoffs?
The key to this series? Stay out of the box. We are the better, more balanced team. 5 on 5 hockey should lead to our success.
Keep out of the box.
Well I don't really find anything you say to be relevant either. So there's that. Let's call it a day. I'm tired of arguing with you about semantics that really don't have anything to do with anything.
I'd probably give the Rangers the edge, but I don't think it's laughable.
Well, it's tougher to take someone seriously if they struggle with things like that, no? If I say I watch the Ragners 20-30 times a season and insist that they're called the Ragners, you'd find it a little peculiar, I'd imagine.
Balance is something that AV learned from Boston. And has put to good use.The TOI last game was roughly 22:00 for everyone in the Top 4, and 13:00 for Moore-Klein. It was the most glorious thing I've ever seen.
This x100.
This is the key. The Rangers IMO without looking at the stats, are a more disciplined team compared to the Bruins. The Rangers have been physical these playoffs but they don't play with the type of edginess that Boston plays with which put them in the box a lot. Marchand took a lot of penalties in that series. The Rangers didn't give up too many power plays to pittsburgh and when they did they were ready. Pittsburgh has more talent on their PP than MTL regardless of the playoff stats this year.
Yes it is very laughable.. our D core is top 3 in the league
Perhaps one's analysis comes across as less polished, but it doesn't effect the accuracy. We've been called far worse in most of the other forums...intentionally I might add.
Balance is something that AV learned from Boston. And has put to good use.
Only to a point. And let's face it, if you lack motivation when being a series away from the Cup finals, there are other issues at stake.Motivation is a big part of any team's success.
It has been written and talked about ad naseum. If your view is that he did not learn the lesson the hard way when his team lost to Boston, that is your choice.How do you know where he learned anything?
I give Montreal the edge in pregame ceremonies its awesome.
Fair enough, but it's not semantics. The topic was brought up by you, after all. And you were keen to apply some logic on Montreal being disadvantaged by a lack of emotional motivation that you weren't prepared to apply to the Rangers. My point was simply: I don't think that's a factor, but if it is, then it applies to both teams.
Habs fans actually think they have a better defense than us.
McDonagh-Girardi
Staal-Stralman
Moore-Klein
vs
Gorges-Subban
Markov-Emelin
Beaulieu-Weaver
They're close, but I take our D corp 9 times out of 10. I'll take Girardi over Gorges, Staal over Markov, and Stralman over Emelin. Subban at the moment has the edge on McD, but McD on his game (which he has been the past 3 games) closes that gap. Weaver is better than Klein, and Moore/Beaulieu are mostly irrelevant.
honestly **** the habs and their fans, they're all cocky and apparently super stoned. Their whole defense relies around subban and yet they say they have better defense? LOL and honestly I'm predicting nash comes alive this series and we end it in 6 games. and nash will have at least 4 goals. BOOK IT