Viqsi
"that chick from Ohio"
Have they had the track record of on-ice performance Ottawa has had?Have they had the track record of attendance Ottawa has had?
Have they had the track record of on-ice performance Ottawa has had?Have they had the track record of attendance Ottawa has had?
No, nor the attendance. So why did you even mention Ottawa?Have they had the track record of on-ice performance Ottawa has had?
So, basically, that market has never even gotten a chance to actually see competent hockey and thus learn to appreciate it? Thus possibly contributing to why attendance is so crap?
Coyotes changed owners a few times. Why didn't anyone good view the Coyotes as a worthwhile investment over the past 15 years since Moyes declared bankruptcy?Arizona hasn't?
Its the 11th biggest media market in NA.
First off, i don't live in Edmonton, secondly the size of the market is of no consequence if the populous does not connect with the sport. If Houston got a professional Cricket team, would anyone be surprised if they struggled to get fans to the games?Its the 11th biggest media market in NA.
There are 4.8 million people in the Phoenix area, twice Vegas and 4 times Salt Lake City areas.
The team made the playoffs 4 times since 2002. I dont blame the fans for not being invested. Why invest when the product sucks due to the ownership sucking. Why go to a game when the experience sucks.
I get it's hard to understand in Edmonton where there is nothing to do except hockey, but large markets in America have other options. All 3 of the other major sports leagues are in Phoenix. If the Ducks were run as poorly as the Coyotes were they would also not have a huge fanbase.
Look at Florida. Their attendance was trash while the team was bad. Now that they are good they are selling out every game.
Hockey isn't cricket so lets keep the strawman to a minimum. And you either just didn't read my comment or you don't care.First off, i don't live in Edmonton, secondly the size of the market is of no consequence if the populous does not connect with the sport. If Houston got a professional Cricket team, would anyone be surprised if they struggled to get fans to the games?
There could be 20 million people in the Phoenix area, if nobody's watching the games it's irrelevant, which hockey largely is in Arizona.
Coyotes changed owners a few times. Why didn't anyone good view the Coyotes as a worthwhile investment over the past 15 years since Moyes declared bankruptcy?
Can imagine most want something turnkey, vs having to deal with the city on a new arena and have the spotlight of being a billionaire asking for taxpayer funds right off the hop before they've built up some goodwill.
That is not a strawman argument. for as upset as you're getting (no idea why) the truth is that hockey is not big enough in that area regardless of how many people live there.Hockey isn't cricket so lets keep the strawman to a minimum. And you either just didn't read my comment or you don't care.
The team has been bad, because of ownership, for over 20 years. They have been in need of an arena made for hockey for the whole of their existence. There are 3 other professional sports teams in town. Why would you invest in a team/experience like that?
How many people in Nashville, Tampa, Carolina, Florida, San Jose, Anaheim, Dallas, etc grew up playing and watching hockey? It doesn't hold them back from embracing the game.That is not a strawman argument. for as upset as you're getting (no idea why) the truth is that hockey is not big enough in that area regardless of how many people live there.
Maybe it would have been different if they would've had success early into the move from Winnipeg, and you can blame ownership/management whatever the cause for the lack of success was, but they didn't have success, so once the novelty of a new team wore off, apathy towards the Coyotes set in. there is very little foundational knowledge and love of the game of hockey from residents in that area.
Saying Arizona is a good market because the other pro sports teams do well there is exactly the reason why hockey ISN'T surviving there. it's a niche sport that the majority of residents haven't played, or grown up watching, so why would they divide their attention from the local sports teams they have followed their whole lives and probably played the sport growing up?
When Vegas moved in, they were the only professional sports team in town, plus they went to the Stanley Cup final in their first season, and have been good from day 1. they've solidified a fan base because of those reasons. Arizona has had not done the same.
How is comparing Hockey to Cricket in popularity in an American market not a strawman..... I think I'm done with you buddy.That is not a strawman argument. for as upset as you're getting (no idea why) the truth is that hockey is not big enough in that area regardless of how many people live there.
Maybe it would have been different if they would've had success early into the move from Winnipeg, and you can blame ownership/management whatever the cause for the lack of success was, but they didn't have success, so once the novelty of a new team wore off, apathy towards the Coyotes set in. there is very little foundational knowledge and love of the game of hockey from residents in that area.
Saying Arizona is a good market because the other pro sports teams do well there is exactly the reason why hockey ISN'T surviving there. it's a niche sport that the majority of residents haven't played, or grown up watching, so why would they divide their attention from the local sports teams they have followed their whole lives and probably played the sport growing up?
When Vegas moved in, they were the only professional sports team in town, plus they went to the Stanley Cup final in their first season, and have been good from day 1. they've solidified a fan base because of those reasons. Arizona has had not done the same.
Quit using logic. If the town isnt a "hockey town" then no way an NHL team can succeed.How many people in Nashville, Tampa, Carolina, Florida, San Jose, Anaheim, Dallas, etc grew up playing and watching hockey? It doesn't hold them back from embracing the game.
How many people in Nashville, Tampa, Carolina, Florida, San Jose, Anaheim, Dallas, etc grew up playing and watching hockey? It doesn't hold them back from embracing the game.
I swear you True North folks think there's some "likes hockey" gene that you're either born with or not. It's not that complicated, put out a compelling product in a large enough market and it'll be fine.
First off I'm not comparing the sports, and by the way Cricket is the second largest sport in popularity in the world, but what i said is nobody gives a shit about Cricket in Houston Texas, much like nobody gave a shit about hockey in Arizona, regardless of how big the market is. it's a sport they are unfamiliar with and have zero interest in learning.How is comparing Hockey to Cricket in popularity in an American market not a strawman..... I think I'm done with you buddy.
Quit using logic. If the town isnt a "hockey town" then no way an NHL team can succeed.
“Area”Nhl is probably a distant memory in Phoenix. They haven't played there for decades.
Don’t think any future expansion club will do as well as LV did. Too many clubs over thought it. Plus most were giving out nmc like candy. Not as many clubs in a tough situation for Seattle vs LV.They should give Arizona back all their draft picks.
The expansion rules have been extremely generous, but it is going to be tough for them to see another city get to benefit from the years of finishing near the bottom and accumulating all those picks, prospects, and future young stars. Almost like the Browns moving, and Baltimore winning a Stanley Bowl the next year.
I mean I think Nashville would be happier playing more geographic (SEC) rivals like the Florida's, Carolina, and Atlanta than they would Winnipeg/Minnesota/Colorado.Atlanta (East)
Houston (West)
Arizona (West)
Real question is, who would be the 4th team? Should be a team that would slot naturally into the Eastern conference. Another western team would push Chicago or Nashville east and result in them being the only team in that conference not in the Eastern Time zone -- something which they would really hate.
do you have this backwards? the opposite is a significant factor in California, so much so that that the legislature in California is trying to tax people who are leaving.I was in Arizona a few years ago and someone I was speaking with said the city had changed significantly post pandemic. The person I spoke with (a born and raised who had worked in Calgary for a few years) had mentioned there had been a significant migration into the area (ie: California) and a significant migration out (Texas). Add in the ownership shituation for the last decade, and I wonder if that contributed to the ennui or lack of interest in the Coyotes.
Based on what I saw in Scottsdale, what I heard from this individual and what I noticed driving around, there's a lot of interest in sports in general from those in the area. Even college sports interest was really damn high. It's basically just hockey that's in a horrible situation.
As much as I agree with what others have been saying about the Yotes, remove shituation, better owners, less issues with the rink location/tie it into the entertainment/college sports scene and I think they could do just as well as Dallas/Nashville/St Louis/Vegas as a hub for hockey. I don't trust Seravalli, but I do think that in the future, Arizona NHL hockey could be a huge success.
Why would Atlanta be next? They have had teams fail there multiple times.I swear, if they get a team back before Atlanta…
But 10-15 years wouldn’t surprise me.
The brick wall or your head?If at first you don't succeed, just keep slamming your head into that brick wall. It is bound to cave in at some point.