As opposed to all the other coaches who got hired onto contenders? Teams looking for new coaches generally aren't doing well at the time.
Also are you talking about Carolina? The team that won the cup the first year after Maurice was fired?
Right, but the last season the Hurricanes had Maurice they missed the playoffs by only 2 points, and they had just lost in the Stanley Cup finals 2 years previous to that, with the lockout season buffering Maurice's firing and a Stanley Cup win.
The fact remains that Maurice has had some atrocious teams to coach, and he's shown when he has the talent, he does get results. Is he the best coach all time or in that conversation? No. Is he as bad as some here say, not close.
There's a reason he's coached more games than almost anyone in league history. We can assume all the people hiring and extending him are idiots and forum posters are way smarter, or we can follow the logic and accept that Paul Maurice is a good coach.
Is it time for him to move on from the Jets? I wouldn't be against that at all, as I think a fresh coaching staff top to bottom could really rejuvinate this group, and we could find a coach that fits the best with the skillset we have. However, with a coaching change, there is the chance that they could end up being worse than Maurice, not better.
At the end of the day, it does not matter who is coaching the Jets, people here will hate him and think he's making the dumbest decisions ever because forum posters live in a fantasy world, and NHL coaches work in reality. Every coach wants to keep their job, and they do that by winning, I have no doubt the Paul Maurice is doing everything in his power, within the complex environment of an NHL franchise to win games. I also think he's a smart man, so I have confidence that even though we question his decisions, he has sensible arguments he can make for all of them, that include a lot of factors we do not consider, here.