Speculation: Sens need to trade a core player

Agent Zuuuub

Registered User
Jan 2, 2015
15,324
12,764
No, Staois isn’t moving Brady, Timmy or Sandy.
I could see him considering moving Zub in the off season, with his concussion concerns.

if we get better by trading one of them why not?

Rantanen is 100 point player, same with Pasta.

Either make our team better than Brady.
 

bernmeister

Registered User
Jun 11, 2010
28,719
4,235
Da Big Apple
Tkachuk for Lafreniere.
no

howev, if a 1:1 LaF for Sanderson could work

or

whole kid line [a 3rd line w/crazy good results 5x5, could be 2nd line elsewhere]
Cuylle + Chytil + Kakko
+ KAM
plus 2 conditional 7ths which can upgrade significantly if Chytl does not play enuf over next 2 seasons

for

Sanderson + Pinto

4 for 2
 

Fjordy

私たちはそうでした - 私たちはそうではありません。
Jun 20, 2018
17,568
9,689
no

howev, if a 1:1 LaF for Sanderson could work

or

whole kid line [a 3rd line w/crazy good results 5x5, could be 2nd line elsewhere]
Cuylle + Chytil + Kakko
+ KAM
plus 2 conditional 7ths which can upgrade significantly if Chytl does not play enuf over next 2 seasons

for

Sanderson + Pinto

4 for 2
I wonder if anyone has ever traded a whole line at once in one trade? :sarcasm:
 

bernmeister

Registered User
Jun 11, 2010
28,719
4,235
Da Big Apple
I wonder if anyone has ever traded a whole line at once in one trade? :sarcasm:
who the eff cares?
we do not have to be slaves to conformity

will you try to change things
with the power that you have
the power of a million new ideas?
-- Robert Lamm, Chicago

the question, as ever, is if there is enuf value received vs value surrendered to = acceptable profit
 

HFpapi

Registered User
Mar 6, 2010
1,593
2,677
Toronto/Amsterdam
Yeah, Sabres traded Eichel and Reinhart and look how good that turned out. Sabres ended the playoff drought immediately and have gone on to success ever since while Jack & Sam toil in perpetual mediocracy. Wonder what those two guys are even up to these days.

Screenshot 2024-11-21 at 21.23.01.png


Trading Brady or Stutzle would be dumb. Stick with this core and figure it out.
 

Yepthatsme

Registered User
Oct 25, 2020
1,727
1,708
If Pinto is available you think the Flames would be calling. Calgary has plenty to offer too, between bolstering their RD with Andersson, as well some very solid veterans in Coleman, Backlund, and Kadri.

A solid basis would be Andersson at 50% + one of those vets, for Pinto++ with the additions added to Pinto pending which player they want.
 

Bjornar Moxnes

Registered User
Oct 16, 2016
12,314
4,825
Troms og Finnmark
If Pinto is available you think the Flames would be calling. Calgary has plenty to offer too, between bolstering their RD with Andersson, as well some very solid veterans in Coleman, Backlund, and Kadri.

A solid basis would be Andersson at 50% + one of those vets, for Pinto++ with the additions added to Pinto pending which player they want.
Andersson is definitely the one player I'm willing to trade Pinto for and it'll fit both teams well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Barsky

Barsky

Registered User
Jun 22, 2010
279
163
They should have kept Chychrun and traded Chabot. Been saying it the entire time.

Pinto or Norris makes the most sense after him.
No market for Chabby or I'm sure they would have, after all look at the lack of value they got for Chyc. It's Norris all day for me, just a matter of time b4 his shoulders give out
 

Coach Parker

Stanley Cup Champion
Jun 22, 2008
22,477
9,689
Vancouver, B.C.
Sens fans, what is missing from this equation:

_______ + McAvoy
Tkachuk + ______

Add a Bruins forward and a Sens D to make it work cap-wise and also to improve both teams.

For the record, I don't see any trade like this happening and I am a McAvoy fan (have his merch as well) but I love discussing realistic value with other fan bases.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad