Speculation: Sens need to trade a core player

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
No, Staois isn’t moving Brady, Timmy or Sandy.
I could see him considering moving Zub in the off season, with his concussion concerns.

if we get better by trading one of them why not?

Rantanen is 100 point player, same with Pasta.

Either make our team better than Brady.
 
Tkachuk for Lafreniere.
no

howev, if a 1:1 LaF for Sanderson could work

or

whole kid line [a 3rd line w/crazy good results 5x5, could be 2nd line elsewhere]
Cuylle + Chytil + Kakko
+ KAM
plus 2 conditional 7ths which can upgrade significantly if Chytl does not play enuf over next 2 seasons

for

Sanderson + Pinto

4 for 2
 
no

howev, if a 1:1 LaF for Sanderson could work

or

whole kid line [a 3rd line w/crazy good results 5x5, could be 2nd line elsewhere]
Cuylle + Chytil + Kakko
+ KAM
plus 2 conditional 7ths which can upgrade significantly if Chytl does not play enuf over next 2 seasons

for

Sanderson + Pinto

4 for 2
I wonder if anyone has ever traded a whole line at once in one trade? :sarcasm:
 
I wonder if anyone has ever traded a whole line at once in one trade? :sarcasm:
who the eff cares?
we do not have to be slaves to conformity

will you try to change things
with the power that you have
the power of a million new ideas?
-- Robert Lamm, Chicago

the question, as ever, is if there is enuf value received vs value surrendered to = acceptable profit
 
Yeah, Sabres traded Eichel and Reinhart and look how good that turned out. Sabres ended the playoff drought immediately and have gone on to success ever since while Jack & Sam toil in perpetual mediocracy. Wonder what those two guys are even up to these days.

Screenshot 2024-11-21 at 21.23.01.png


Trading Brady or Stutzle would be dumb. Stick with this core and figure it out.
 
I don’t see the need to trade a core player.
They are tied for third in xGA%
Tied for first in HDCA

Huge improvement in those numbers compared to previous seasons.
 
If Pinto is available you think the Flames would be calling. Calgary has plenty to offer too, between bolstering their RD with Andersson, as well some very solid veterans in Coleman, Backlund, and Kadri.

A solid basis would be Andersson at 50% + one of those vets, for Pinto++ with the additions added to Pinto pending which player they want.
 
If Pinto is available you think the Flames would be calling. Calgary has plenty to offer too, between bolstering their RD with Andersson, as well some very solid veterans in Coleman, Backlund, and Kadri.

A solid basis would be Andersson at 50% + one of those vets, for Pinto++ with the additions added to Pinto pending which player they want.
Andersson is definitely the one player I'm willing to trade Pinto for and it'll fit both teams well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Barsky
They should have kept Chychrun and traded Chabot. Been saying it the entire time.

Pinto or Norris makes the most sense after him.
No market for Chabby or I'm sure they would have, after all look at the lack of value they got for Chyc. It's Norris all day for me, just a matter of time b4 his shoulders give out
 
Loved Pager, but Sens will keep the much younger guy.
You mean you don’t want to send the Long Island boy home at discount? I thought it was like when everyone from Toronto must play for the Leafs and QC with the habs.
 
Sens fans, what is missing from this equation:

_______ + McAvoy
Tkachuk + ______

Add a Bruins forward and a Sens D to make it work cap-wise and also to improve both teams.

For the record, I don't see any trade like this happening and I am a McAvoy fan (have his merch as well) but I love discussing realistic value with other fan bases.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad