I agree. Humans aren't one harmonious being, and we're selfish in nature. There's a long history of it. I often think of that in an apocalyptic setting and what it would look like. Without laws, humans are an awful species. What's the point of me trying to set up survival when one of my redneck neighbors will surely just shoot and loot me for my supplies.
It's a shame, but whatever, it is too late and I don't care. It's not like human beings carry great importance, they're just another species that evolved, thrived for a while, and will be extinct. An irrelevant speck of sand in the context of history. I find the whole god angle hilarious for that. Like, are humans so arrogant that we think our lives actually have meaning? That this great force is somehow about us? Lol, give me a break.
As long as there is oxygen there will be humans.I watched I Am Legend last night and finished The Last of Us recently.
I was struck by how much more beautiful the world looks as nature takes it back over from humans. Much prettier than the manicured concrete jungles we live in.
One day the Earth will thrive again and humans will be just a speck of sand in the context of history.
For sure, but advancements made from the advanced human way of life, overpopulation, and the industrial revolution are the ones that obviously expedite it to the point of unsustainability.All living organisms has a degree of selfishness. Can't survive very long without it.
And yes, I seriously doubt there will be more than a handful of humans left on the planet in the next 300 years or so. Our success as a species will also be our failure. At least those of us that are around right now won't be around for the grand finale of our species. We'll still be living the good life for the next 30-50 years before things go all screwy.
If society collapses, I'm sure there will be pockets of survivors if/until an extinction level event happens. They'll wipe each other out in huge numbers too as they fight over resources and for survival. If things go to hell, it's not going to be a fun place to live, that's for sure.As long as there is oxygen there will be humans.
For sure, but advancements made from the advanced human way of life, overpopulation, and the industrial revolution are the ones that obviously expedite it to the point of unsustainability.
Dinosaurs lived for like 165 million years without destroying the world they lived in and humans accomplished it basically in 100 years. That's staggering in comparison.
I'm good with it. I hate the idea of my son paying the price, but that's the risk of being human and he'll hopefully enjoy the ride first. Personally, I could take it or leave it at this point. Human existence feels incredibly pointless to me.
If society collapses, I'm sure there will be pockets of survivors if/until an extinction level event happens. They'll wipe each other out in huge numbers too as they fight over resources and for survival. If things go to hell, it's not going to be a fun place to live
The climate was once extremely volatile for thousands of years and our species was fine.
Can some tell me what the target temperature all of this climate talk is trying to achieve?
What is the Y axis on that chart? It ranges from -50 to -30…?The climate was once extremely volatile for thousands of years and our species was fine.
View attachment 880836
Can some tell me what the target temperature all of this climate talk is trying to achieve?
It's the average temperature in central Greenland in Celcius, so an area with an artic tundra climate, not a global temperature. Of note, Greenland was only inhabited by humans in the last 5000 years, and the dryas is linked to a number of extinctionsWhat is the Y axis on that chart? It ranges from -50 to -30…?
Post the link.The climate was once extremely volatile for thousands of years and our species was fine.
View attachment 880836
Can some tell me what the target temperature all of this climate talk is trying to achieve?
What do you think about species extinction rates?The climate was once extremely volatile for thousands of years and our species was fine.
View attachment 880836
Can some tell me what the target temperature all of this climate talk is trying to achieve?
Post the link.
Or are you worried it’s from a climate denier.
Thanks, exactly why I figured no link provided.It comes from a presentation by Don Easterbrook from 2010 where he predicts global cooling. He's known for denying CO2 could possibly cause global warming, and accuses NOAA and NASA of tampering with the data when challenged with peer reviewed work that goes against his claims.
Don Easterbrook
Don Easterbrook Credentials Background Don Easterbrook is a Professor Emeritus of Glacial Geology and Environmental and Engineering Geology at Western Washington University. Don Easterbrook is the editor of Evidence-Based Climate Science, a book which claims to produce data that is...www.desmog.com
Well, I see that’s how it’s labelled but surely that’s not correct… ie, the average year round temperature in the current era is not -30?It's the average temperature in central Greenland in Celcius, so an area with an artic tundra climate, not a global temperature. Of note, Greenland was only inhabited by humans in the last 5000 years, and the dryas is linked to a number of extinctions
Come on. If you’re an 18 year old jock at an interview with a bunch of other jocks, you think you’d be pedantic about answering that question and say something like “Well, I’m sure you’re aware that Homo sapiens are really just animals…”It’s funny..like I was just talking about the other day, people are so ignorant they don’t even understand that they are animals. If people can’t even get the most basic facts about ourselves learned then how dumb are people really?
Apparently a popular question at the combine was “What animal would you be on and off the ice?”
You mean…like if I wasn’t an animal already?
No. They answer, “hmm if I was an animal I guess I’d be a dolphin.”
If a Toyota Corolla was a car, what kind of car would it be?
It shows how ingrained the ignorance is that it would even be a question.Come on. If you’re an 18 year old jock at an interview with a bunch of other jocks, you think you’d be pedantic about answering that question and say something like “Well, I’m sure you’re aware that Homo sapiens are really just animals…”
That's not central Greenland though, Nuuk and Paamiut are both at the southern tip of Greenland, that's like using Toronto weather proof it is warm in Alert.Well, I see that’s how it’s labelled but surely that’s not correct… ie, the average year round temperature in the current era is not -30?
A quick google landed me here Weather and Climate which seems to show that is (obviously) not the case.
Call me crazy but when I try to understand or interpret any graph, if the values shown don’t align with common sense then I instantly abandon it.
If that's just alright I can take it off your hands for you.View attachment 881118
Since we're in a climate change feedback loop again, here's my contribution as I burned a solid amount of coal this weekend. First time trying brisket-- found a 4 lber at Farm Boy which was perfect since I was too much of a coward to have my first cook be a 10+ lb beast.
Turned out alright, room for improvement though. Misjudged the cut when I was separating the round from the flat, and the intermittent downpours every hour looks like it messed with the smoke ring. Still pretty happy with the results.
Gotta get back to that one, haven't played since a very disappointing launch. It's been long enough now that I'll just run a new playthrough.Finally playing Cyberpunk 2077 after all these years.
What an incredible game. My word.