Micklebot
Moderator
- Apr 27, 2010
- 56,709
- 34,507
Why are they focusing on one plant? I mean, as adoption goes up, you're going to build more plants.Okay, well I'll focus in on one point that is close enough to my field (electrical engineering) that I can comment on it: at about the 1:25 mark he describes the number of years it would take the Tesla battery plant to manufacture enough batteries to power the US (500 years is the claim, no idea whether it's correct or not).
But this is gross distortion, simply because the design of car batteries is so different from the design of batteries that would be used to backup the power grid -- the former has to be a certain (relatively small) size, shape and weight, while the latter is pretty much unconstrained (probably would be small buildings scattered throughout the city).
So the process and economics of manufacturing the two are so different that it makes no sense to compare them.
Really, from that point onwards you should be very skeptical about all the data presented.
How many years would it take the Winsor assembly plans to build enough cars for everyone in north America? Not really relevant since there are other factories that exist to support demand.
To your point, the tesla plant might be good for batter packs in homes, while central hubs for the grid might be done by other plants, a mix of different technologies based on the need