Jokerit headed by this genius does not look impressive though.
Milos Riha got much better results when worked in the second-rate team Atlant
I hope they don't play Lankinen in the goal. He's not been convincing at all, especially against any tougher opposition.
Lankinen had some key saves, but overall, he was pretty bad. Only 14 saves on 18 shots usually doesn't win games in playoff rounds. He's going to need a much higher save % than 77% if Finland is going to win tomorrow.He already has one win vs Canada in the tournament...
You do realize on paper the US has the second best roster ?Except for Gusev's line, Russia hasn't done anything good in that game. The US really sucked in the first period, which decided the outcome of the game. After dominating performance against Sweden, Russia was very beatable against the US.
Lankinen had some key saves, but overall, he was pretty bad. Only 14 saves on 18 shots usually doesn't win games in playoff rounds. He's going to need a much higher save % than 77% if Finland is going to win tomorrow.
"Lankinen had some key saves."It's not the goalies fault if the goals he allows are "unsaveable". This game was one those where simply looking at the stats doesn't do justice for the game. Are you forgetting that save he made at the end of the first (or second period)?
You do realize on paper the US has the second best roster ?
"Lankinen had some key saves."
Did you miss that part?
Third in their conference and second round exit in six games against a team whose budget is three times that of Jokerit. I think that's pretty good for a budget team.Jokerit headed by this genius does not look impressive though.
Milos Riha got much better results when worked in the second-rate team Atlant
77% save percentage implies bad overall. When I wrote "key saves," I specifically was thinking about the same one that you mentioned, plus OT. Finland will not beat Russia unless Lankinen's save % is at least 90%. He will have to play better than he did against Sweden.You also said he was bad overall which implies that either you didn't see replays or just looked at the stats.
77% save percentage implies bad overall. When I wrote "key saves," I specifically was thinking about the same one that you mentioned, plus OT. Finland will not beat Russia unless Lankinen's save % is at least 90%. He will have to play better than he did against Sweden.
I'm not really counting that jet-lagged first game Canada for anything. Seems kind of self serving when their teamplay was so obviously off kilter.He already has one win vs Canada in the tournament...
To me he has looked shaky all tournament. Against Sweden I blame the first and fourth goals on his poor puck tracking. Sure, especially the first one might have gone in regardless, but he didn't even manage to make an effort because he had no idea where the puck was. I would start Olkinuora in the next one.It's not the goalies fault if the goals he allows are "unsaveable". This game was one those where simply looking at the stats doesn't do justice for the game. Are you forgetting that save he made at the end of the first (or second period)?
He let a soft one against Germany, too, but in the Germany game, Grubauer shut the door so Finland couldn't build a lead or crawl back. IHMO, he has made some good key saves throughout the tournie, but he will have to be a difference maker against Russia.To me he has looked shaky all tournament. Against Sweden I blame the first and fourth goals on his poor puck tracking. Sure, especially the first one might have gone in regardless, but he didn't even manage to make an effort because he had no idea where the puck is. I would start Olkinuora in the next one.
Lankinen has been their guy, expect to see him.I hope they don't play Lankinen in the goal. He's not been convincing at all, especially against any tougher opposition.
If Finland can just keep it close through two periods.............................
Better than who ? We have more gold than Finland. Not sure what you’re talking about here.Finland has been a better hockey nation for a decade or more.
They should win.
They won't out grind them for sure but as we all know and admit they have a clear talent advantage. I am sure Jalonen has a plan for this game but everything basically has to go right tomorrow for victory. I think the big worry with this Russian team is that they have the goaltending to back that offensive firepower up, if only there were more question marks in net winning this game would be far less taxing, alas...........that isn't the case.Hah! True... but not entirely. I'm so insecure about this game that there is clear conflict in my mind.
The start of the game is very important. But I don't think that Russia can just simply out-skate Finns physically in the 3rd period. If it ever goes that far. However, their average skill superiority will likely become more visible then if Finns are somehow survived that far.
People shouldn't underestimate the grinding power of an average FEL player. Star spangled Team Russia certainly won't.
...because that game is gonna be a bear (no pun intended)