DarthProbert
Registered User
- Feb 3, 2015
- 1,912
- 1,499
50M is 32.5M below the ceiling, how do you come to the conclusion of needing to shed cap?Ottawa has 11 players signed at ~$50mil. So, assuming we have a similar budget as this year, that leaves us about $15-17mil.
Norris ($5-7.5m) & Formenton ($2.5-4m) need to be re-signed, which leaves anywhere from $3.5-10mil to sign 8 other guys.
All that is to say this: I find it very hard to believe Ottawa would bring in Monahan without shedding salary elsewhere, be it in a trade with Calgary or through other measures.
Best offer I would make is Monahan for MDZ + BOS 3rd.
50M is 32.5M below the ceiling, how do you come to the conclusion of needing to shed cap?
The poster stating that Monahan has issues with drugs should be banned from posting here. I know him casually. The guy barely even drinks and most definitely does not have a drug problem. He has had a hard time with injuries and they have caught up with him on the ice. He's a fantastic person off the ice and a very well liked teammate.
Lol.
The Flames can retain about $2 million max, otherwise it makes more sense to buy him out. They aren't retaining 50%, taking on a bad contract, or adding a 1st.
I agree he has negative value, but his contract is easily bought out if need be.
Rangers likely need a Strome replacement stop gap
I can day definitively he does not have an addiction problem. This post was in response to a post about him definitively having a drug problem. He does not. Full stop.I don't see how knowing him casually, you can definitively state he doesn't have an addiction problem. How do you know what he does privately? No one said he was a party drug guy, if anything, I'd guess it could be painkillers like MANY athletes have gone through after injuries. They tend to keep that discreet until it either comes out, or they seek rehab/help and open up about it. Many of those guys were still fantastic guys and teammates.
I'm not saying I have any clue if he does or doesn't, but I always find it annoying when people state such things as facts they can't possibly know "for a fact".
Back to the thread, if Getzlaf retires, I'd be happy to try him out if the cost to acquire is low.
Monahan is garbage … add a pick to him and retain 50%.
Monahan (@50%) + 3rd
for
7th rounder
Florida might do that deal with the recent trade history with the Flames.
I have a use for many Flames players… Monahan is not one of them.
I can day definitively he does not have an addiction problem. This post was in response to a post about him definitively having a drug problem. He does not. Full stop.
On the rest of your post. I don't think he would cost anything to acquire. I'm sure the Flames would be happy to move him for a conditional 7th rounder in the offseason given the raises due to Mangiapane, Gaudreau, Tkachuk and Kylington.
I know he isn't meeting expectations, but THAT bad? My understanding is that he was having bad seasons because of injuries, not that he was on his way out of the nhl. Monahan at 3-4 M for middle-6 duties sounds like something Mtl should think about.
No he isn't that bad. He's decent on the PP. His biggest issue is he was never the world's best skater and injuries over the years have made things worse. But there's no way the Flames retain on him. He only has one year left and is a pretty easy buyout.
Yes I'd do that no questions asked. Even if the pick was conditional on him scoring 20 and we'd get a 7th rounder or something. Isn't there still some potential in Steel?I'd definitely be good to send a late pick or Sam Steel (if Ducks wanted to send a contract back) for him then, as if I recall, he was one of the highest hockey IQ guys in his draft year and that doesn't just vanish. Well worth the risk given it's only for one year.
I agree with you. He was a below average defensive player before, I'd call him average now. That doesn't balance out the missing 30 goals though.His biggest issue is he used to be a bad skater who knew how to put himself in a good position and was a sniper. Now his deadly shot is gone, which was basically the strength of his game. Oddly enough I think his defensive game is way better than it used to be now, but that doesn't balance out what he's lost.
The default assumption should be that someone does not have a drug problem until such time as some sort of proof exists that they do. The guy making those accusations should back them up or STFU.I don't see how knowing him casually, you can definitively state he doesn't have an addiction problem. How do you know what he does privately? No one said he was a party drug guy, if anything, I'd guess it could be painkillers like MANY athletes have gone through after injuries. They tend to keep that discreet until it either comes out, or they seek rehab/help and open up about it. Many of those guys were still fantastic guys and teammates.
I'm not saying I have any clue if he does or doesn't, but I always find it annoying when people state such things as facts they can't possibly know "for a fact".
The only reason the Flames would consider moving him is to free up cap space to sign free agents this off season, no way in hell they touch Gallagher's albatross contract.Gallagher 1-for-1
The whole reason why Calgary would be moving Monahan, Is so they can resign both Gaudreau and Tkachuk. So how is adding a more expensive Gallagher at longer term help them?Gallagher 1-for-1
I don't see how knowing him casually, you can definitively state he doesn't have an addiction problem. How do you know what he does privately? No one said he was a party drug guy, if anything, I'd guess it could be painkillers like MANY athletes have gone through after injuries. They tend to keep that discreet until it either comes out, or they seek rehab/help and open up about it. Many of those guys were still fantastic guys and teammates.
I'm not saying I have any clue if he does or doesn't, but I always find it annoying when people state such things as facts they can't possibly know "for a fact".
Back to the thread, if Getzlaf retires, I'd be happy to try him out if the cost to acquire is low.
You have a drug problem. Everyone knows it, it’s common knowledge.
See how easy that was?
Yes I'd do that no questions asked. Even if the pick was conditional on him scoring 20 and we'd get a 7th rounder or something. Isn't there still some potential in Steel?
I liked Steel in his draft year so I would probably do that. I figured McTavish would be joining full-time next year, or would he be more mentored in replacing Rakell?Steel + a mid round pick could interest the Ducks. They're probably going to need a mid 6 center if Getzlaf retires and can afford to see if Monahan rebounds. Sell him at the next deadline if he does or let him walk.