kingsfan28
Its A Kingspiracy !
First off, it should be reviewable, but before it can be, the rule has to be more black or white than the rule is today - which covers multiple pages in the rule book. Throw the officials a clarity bone.
They will likely have to go to the international tournament rule re: skates or sticks in the blue paint if the NHL makes goalie interference reviewable, meaning no skate or stick of the attacking team can enter the blue paint without the puck at any time. The only exception is if a defender intentionally pushes an attacking player in that area, but then you get back to the gray area situation we had last game.
I don't think the goal should have counted, but allowing review with the current convoluted rule would mean one subjective call could be overturned by another, and that would be worse than what we have today, not better.
Reviewable plays have to involve black or white decisions or you get more "distinct kicking motion" bull**** reviews. Puck over glass? Reviewable. Puck hitting netting? Reviewable. Goalie interference? Only if the rule is changed to be definitive.
The puck over the glass "so called" miss call is getting some traction today. The replays are inconclusive, and the guy closest with the best view was the ref who was emphatic that it went off of something. Craig Button almost blew a gasket over this today .