Post-Game Talk: SC Finals, Here We Come

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
I hear you, Bluenote. I'm a few years older but 20 years ago seemed like a longgg time ago! Watched the clincher against the Devils back then at a Jersey shore bar just ahead of Memorial Day weekend, on a Friday, drinking pints of Bud, and maybe Busch. Funny enough that bar has changed. Watched last night on my couch, after watching in the kitchen and making dinner, drinking Brooklyn Black Chocolate Stout, wondering why I didn't keep up my 7 year old. Yea, 20 years ago was a longg time ago.

My parents kept me up during the '79 run, look what a nut I've become :D

"This one will last a lifetime !'

Sure has felt like it.


Oh, and I fully expect to see every player from the '94 team(RIP Potsy) in attendance at one point, including JD and Neil Smith, these are weird times.
 
The Devil's board is absolutely hilarious.

Some of them just exemplify the emotion of bitter. It was really a great read.
 
she did a MUCH better job growing up compared to whoever the heck that is next to her (if thats fred savage then colour me shocked).

If he walks like a duck, if he talks like a duck, then it must the Pfeiffster.

(I am pretty sure thats the guy that played Paul Pfeiffer)
 
McKenzie said it best. Carey Price playing makes zero difference in this series, the Rangers were the better team.

If Price could have provided Subban fresh legs, given Vanek a pulse, taken years off Brian Gionta and Markov, made Gallagher, Desharnais and Galchenyuk and made the Habs faster in general than he deserves the Conn Smythe.
 
I kind of wish Price played so that after we won, every moron who intimated that Price was/is better than Hank would've had nothing to hang their hat on.

That being said, Tokarski played as good as Price would have in this series and the Rangers still won.
 
The Devil's board is absolutely hilarious.

Some of them just exemplify the emotion of bitter. It was really a great read.

it's par for the course. of course they are bitter. they've missed the post season again and the rangers are in the SCF. i'm sure if the roles were reversed a lot of folks here would be doing the same thing.

it's half the fun of being a sports fan.
 
Holy **** it's 1:40 already. Haven't even looked at an actual 'work screen' yet today lol. Just these boards (read every single post) and video after video after article after article. Just so still on cloud 9, and believe in this team so damn much. I don't care who we face, and neither should anyone else. Let them be scared of us. We have the best goalie in the world, one of the best defenseman in the world, surrounded by a pretty damn good other 5, leadership everywhere, heart, character, integrity, and warriors abound. Boyle is the very epitome of a warrior, and he ain't done yet. Him and Moore have much more in store (weehee, a rhyme!). Nash is gonna come alive. MSL is going to inspire and lead on the ice. Zucc is gonna be Zucc, and that line will do what they do. We've got depth, we've got an awesome transition game, we've got speed, we've got size and power in Kreider. We may not have the biggest names, but look what the biggest names got us over the course of 7 years (most of you should know what I'm talking about). No. Instead, we have a complete team; and a team that believes in itself and in each other. A sum greater than its parts. **** LA and **** Chicago. They are both worthy opponents for sure, and likely the toughest opponent we'd have to face yet. But that's the whole point of the Cup. It's the hardest trophy to win for a reason. But you've gotta believe. You don't get to the finals by accident. If you're in it, you can win it; PERIOD. Believe my friends, with all your heart and with all your might. There is no legitimate nor rational reason whatsoever why we can't do this. We just have to remember all the things that got us there.

Oh, and thanks to the CBC feed. That footage was friggin amazing!! And on a side note, I can watch that Hank replay of the Vanek save over and over again (and have).
 
I have made one of these for each of the 3 series'. I feel like the observations and assumptions of playing style and match ups has been fairly spot on for the last 3 series' and I'm going to make one of these again for the Kings.

If the Hawks come back i'll re-do this for how we stack up against them, but I think the Kings take care of business tonight.

Offense: There are some key differences between these offenses that need to be established. These teams are not the same, although i've seen a lot of "the Kings are the Rangers with a better D". There is 1 common denominator between the two offenses and that is balance. Both teams can roll out 4 lines regularly without fearing disaster. But the similarities end there. The Rangers have a faster offense. LA has speed but no where near that of the Rangers'. However, LA has something that the Rangers lack (besides the obvious size which may or may not be an advantage). The Kings' offense is efficient and opportunistic while the Rangers are inefficient and unlucky. Kings resemble the Penguins in the regard that if they get a prime opportunity, more often than not, they'll bury it. The way that it will shake down is that the Rangers offense will create their opportunities by stretch passes and the Kings will create their opportunities by sending bodies to the net or capitalizing on Ranger mistakes. I'd give the offensive advantage to the Kings because they capitalize more often than we can.

Defense: The Kings are bigger but they are slower. The Rangers are faster but they are smaller. Kings have Doughty but I think he can be contained much in the same manner that Subban was contained for the last 6 games. After that we have a clear advantage over their defense. They play a similar defensive style to the Canadiens and Flyers where they clog up the passing lanes with their sticks. The Rangers found ways to beat both teams that played in this manner. The faster defense that we have will be able to mitigate the LA attack more than the Blackhawks have been able to. And for them, they will have to beat us with their secondary lines, on 5v5 hockey. I give the defensive advantage to the Rangers.

Goalies: It's even. A wash.

Coaches: Slight advantage to Sutter. Although I do believe that AV will be the hungrier of the two coaches. He'll likely have a score to settle from 2 years ago when LA embarrassed Vancouver in the first round.

Special Teams: The LA power play is better than our power play, but our penalty kill is better than their penalty kill. I'd say this is a wash, too... but I'm going to give this advantage to the Rangers, simply because normally, they will be the more disciplined team and likely take less penalties. I don't see the Kings getting under their skin like the Flyers and the Habs did. The special teams advantage over the series should go to the Rangers.

Playing style: The Kings take away the neutral zone and force teams to play dump and chase. The Rangers like to play a transitional style of hockey where they move through the neutral zone with short leading passes. Problem for the Kings is that the Rangers are also comfortable playing dump and chase. They excel at it, as we saw last night. They are a possession team and their speed allows them to take control of the puck in a dump and chase situation. They can move the puck well when they possess it. Rangers played their best game last night playing dump and chase hockey. However, the Kings are just an average team on 5 v 5 hockey. They have been scoring a lot of their goals on power play situations against the Hawks. The Rangers are the better 5 v 5 teams, but the less potent power play team. Stay out of the box and the games will be more manageable for the Rangers.

Overall analysis: It will be an even series. Both teams match up poorly against the other. The Kings will try to use their size, the Rangers will try and use their speed. The goalies are evenly matched and can both steal a game or two for their respective teams. The Rangers offense will give LA's defense fits while LA's defensive style will force Rangers into turnovers and their offense will capitalize on those mistakes. Staying out of the box will make winning easier/more realistic for the Rangers. Being penalized more often will clearly have negative repercussions.

Should be a fun 6/7 game series.

After reading the main board, a little, and then reading your long thoughtful analysis, I have on thing to say to you: Homer!
 
After reading the main board, a little, and then reading your long thoughtful analysis, I have on thing to say to you: Homer!

Pretty well thought out response to what was far from a "Homer" post as it gets. I'll start with the obvious, in which I'd take Lundqvist 10 out of 10 times before Quick..
 
Rangers can do this. I have no doubt. It is incredibly similar to the Bruins in 2011.

They were viewed as no shot. Just next victim to the West. Nobody gave them a shot against the Canucks. Even many Bruins' fans.

But you know what? They are playing with house money. Go out. Be loose. Have fun.

Because when its all said and done.......you still have to play the game.
 
My parents kept me up during the '79 run, look what a nut I've become :D

"This one will last a lifetime !'

Sure has felt like it.


Oh, and I fully expect to see every player from the '94 team(RIP Potsy) in attendance at one point, including JD and Neil Smith, these are weird times.

The Rangers have a business model - every 20 years, pluck NHL players from a team thats won the title 10 years earlier.

1984 Oilers, 1994 Rangers

2004 Lightning, 2014 Rangers

Watch out for the 2024 champs. We'll be purging them in 2 decades.
 
The Rangers have a business model - every 20 years, pluck NHL players from a team thats won the title 10 years earlier.

1984 Oilers, 1994 Rangers

2004 Lightning, 2014 Rangers

Watch out for the 2024 champs. We'll be purging them in 2 decades.

Unexpectedly your funniest post.
 
Ken Campbell? He routinely makes himself look dumb:

Season’s over for Rangers, now it’s time to look to the future
http://www.thehockeynews.com/blog/seasons-over-for-rangers-now-its-time-to-look-to-the-future/

Rangers deserve credit, but they’ll lose Eastern Conference final
http://www.thehockeynews.com/blog/rangers-deserve-credit-but-theyll-lose-eastern-conference-final/

Yes thats the dumbass...I bet he has a nice pathetic article lined up for the Finals
 
Thanks for bringing this up, makes me feel so good.

For anyone wanting some major laughs, check out the few pages of playoff discussion on the Devs and Isles boards. There are going to be some people on suicide watch tonight.

PS: Does anyone have a link Michelles post game conference? Or Don Cherrys meltdown? Looking all over for those.

 
The Rangers have a business model - every 20 years, pluck NHL players from a team thats won the title 10 years earlier.

1984 Oilers, 1994 Rangers

2004 Lightning, 2014 Rangers

Watch out for the 2024 champs. We'll be purging them in 2 decades.

Laughed out loud at this in my office. :laugh:
 
Probably hasnt been said much but I'd like to give a shout out to Raf Diaz. I thought he did a great job stepping in and playing a sound game last night
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad