But they didn't make those moves. Drury did. Every one of his moves has worked out so far. Reaves, Blais, Goodrow, Nemeth, Hunt, and Gallant. It's early but I will give credit where credit is due.
I wont, because I argue any GM could have been hired with the objective of getting the team tougher, and they would have made these trades and signings.
Gallant is void. We had an opening, he was the best coach available, we are the NYR, done. My mother could have gotten Gallant to become our hc.
Hunt and Nemeth are FA signings. I give credit to the guy that presented Drury with the adv. stats on Hunt. Me personally, not impressed by Hunt or Nemeth.
4th liner and 7th d. The Nemeth contract is ok, because he can be traded at any point.
Goodrow is a good player on a bad contract. Drury overpaid.
Reaves is again a deal anybody hired would have and could have done. Good trade, but I want home-runs.
Samuel Blais is awesome and we'll see. Drury did well, by not f***ing the Buch trade up as much as we initially thought he did.
No one anticipated Blais to really be what he has shown so far. And the trade can end up being even.
Drury will get my support when he comes up with a robbery trade. My credit goes to the players and coaches so far.
Why does Drurys very short tenure stink? He made us bigger, tougher, got a legit coach and we are winning?
I think, I feel he (f***ed up) the one "big trade" he had so far. Would have loved to see him shaft STL, alas.
The Kravtsov debacle is also a big factor for sure. He'll need to remedy that one for sure. To be more transparent, I despised him as a player for us, but that is the least important factor.