Player Discussion Sammy Blais

Status
Not open for further replies.

Row I Goon

Registered User
Nov 14, 2018
3,476
7,509
Getting tiring and boring constantly making the same excuses for the same players - unless the franchise has become a charity there’s some decisions needing to be made.
 

HockeyBasedNYC

Feeling it
Aug 2, 2005
20,125
12,201
Here
He's the only forward that throws any kind of meaningful hit, i know he got a penalty tonight but he punishes people and i kinda like it, he's on the 4th line, they played well. Im ok with him in the lineup. Its not like he's keeping someone thats a difference maker out of the lineup
I love his physical play too, but at some point he needs to offer some meaningful possession time with the puck, or god forbid even a little offense, of any kind.

The terrible trade aside, I was a fan of his game before his injury. But it’s been a half a season. I’m all for letting a guy work his way back but it’s (been) obvious (for a while) that it shouldn’t be done on an NHL roster
 

haohmaru

boomshakalaka
Aug 26, 2009
17,014
11,612
Fleming Island, Fl
And McKegg would pot a few goals here and there, with 7 goals in 96 games as a Ranger.

McKegg, and his 0 NHL games this year, is probably not the best example of someone that's better than Blais.

That being said, the "recovering from injury" narrative has lost its luster after the season is half over. He should be sent down to keep rehabbing if that's really what's going on here.
 

TopShelfSnipes

Snipes Like Tarasenkoooo
May 5, 2011
1,126
1,830
USA
Reading this board you can see the emotional trauma Drury inflicted on many of us when he traded Buchnevich. That bad trade broke so many of us it seems. I fear neither the board nor this team will EVER recover.
Bitter about it because you could always see the potential with Buch. He should have been consistently playing with Kreider and Zibanejad all the way back in 2018.

Then, he finally has his best season and gets traded for cap space the Rangers use to bring this useless grinder over here, as well as sign Goodrow and Patrik Nemeth, while hanging on to Strome for another year, and the people trying to justify the trade say that it was for the cap space we used to keep some of the kids.

It's not like the roster was finalized when the trade happened, and we'd have lost Igor, or K'Andre, or been unable to afford Fox unless Buch was moved. There WAS cap room, just the Rangers decided to prioritize overpaid depth (again) by paying Patrik Nemeth almost half of Buchnevich's eventual cap hit, and signing Goodrow to generally play on their bottom 6.

Meanwhile, Buchnevich is playing like everything we hoped he could be while we are stuck with a player who's going to make Gordie Dwyer look like a RIchard trophy candidate.

The Rangers have made some pretty awful trades over the years, and this one is definitely up there.
 

markymarc1215

Registered User
Jan 8, 2023
457
437
Southwest Florida
McKegg, and his 0 NHL games this year, is probably not the best example of someone that's better than Blais.

That being said, the "recovering from injury" narrative has lost its luster after the season is half over. He should be sent down to keep rehabbing if that's really what's going on here.
My point exactly. McKegg was a plug-in FA signing for the league minimum. Blais, cap dump or not, was traded (putting a late 2nd round pick aside) for a young 1st line player on our team, who we watched grow from a beanpole with moves into a bonafide 1st line winger, and who actually is homegrown prospect. We rarely see a forward that we draft develop into that. Plus he was well liked on the team and amongst the fanbase.

To me, that is all the difference. We dont expect much from the Rooney's, McKegg's, or any other fringe NHL player we sign to a minimum wage, possibly 2 way contract. If you are the lone roster player coming back for a prime Pavel Buchnevich, you have to show more than Ryan Hollweg type ability. At worst, I figured he would be a Brandon Prust type player. Thus far, I was wrong
 

bhamill

Registered User
Sponsor
Apr 16, 2012
4,721
5,882
Bitter about it because you could always see the potential with Buch. He should have been consistently playing with Kreider and Zibanejad all the way back in 2018.

Then, he finally has his best season and gets traded for cap space the Rangers use to bring this useless grinder over here, as well as sign Goodrow and Patrik Nemeth, while hanging on to Strome for another year, and the people trying to justify the trade say that it was for the cap space we used to keep some of the kids.

It's not like the roster was finalized when the trade happened, and we'd have lost Igor, or K'Andre, or been unable to afford Fox unless Buch was moved. There WAS cap room, just the Rangers decided to prioritize overpaid depth (again) by paying Patrik Nemeth almost half of Buchnevich's eventual cap hit, and signing Goodrow to generally play on their bottom 6.

Meanwhile, Buchnevich is playing like everything we hoped he could be while we are stuck with a player who's going to make Gordie Dwyer look like a RIchard trophy candidate.

The Rangers have made some pretty awful trades over the years, and this one is definitely up there.
All well and good except the trade wasn't for Blais... that is a mis framing of it. It was Buch for a 2nd rounder, Blais and cap space. Space used to bring in Copp, Vatrano and Motte for the playoff run. Saying there was cap room is revisionist, it was tight and something had to give. And the feeling around here was that it was also to make room for the young up and coming players. Now I'm not saying they made the right choice, just that a decision had to be made. Sure they could have held onto Buch, but he likely would have then been allowed to walk for nothing at the end of his contract. You think Blais, a second and cap space is bad asset management? Allowing him to walk would be worse.
Everytime I see someone scream "This is why we traded Buchnevich?!?" referencing Blais, I feel bad that this person has been so terribly wounded that rationality has been erased from the equation. Hahaha.
 
  • Like
Reactions: egelband

TopShelfSnipes

Snipes Like Tarasenkoooo
May 5, 2011
1,126
1,830
USA
All well and good except the trade wasn't for Blais... that is a mis framing of it. It was Buch for a 2nd rounder, Blais and cap space. Space used to bring in Copp, Vatrano and Motte for the playoff run. Saying there was cap room is revisionist, it was tight and something had to give. And the feeling around here was that it was also to make room for the young up and coming players. Now I'm not saying they made the right choice, just that a decision had to be made. Sure they could have held onto Buch, but he likely would have then been allowed to walk for nothing at the end of his contract. You think Blais, a second and cap space is bad asset management? Allowing him to walk would be worse.
Everytime I see someone scream "This is why we traded Buchnevich?!?" referencing Blais, I feel bad that this person has been so terribly wounded that rationality has been erased from the equation. Hahaha.
It's not revisionist.

Goodrow's cap hit was 3.7M(ish).
1-2 days later they trade Buch. Buch's cap hit 5.8M, Blais cap hit 1.5M - net savings 4.3M.
Less than a week after that they sign Nemeth at a 2.5M cap hit.

The saved space from Buch wasn't for Copp and Vatrano because it was already spent long before they got here. Those 3 moves actually put them 1.9M in the hole on cap space.

Better hope Elias Salomonsson turns into an absolute stud.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Off Sides

bhamill

Registered User
Sponsor
Apr 16, 2012
4,721
5,882
It's not revisionist.

Goodrow's cap hit was 3.7M(ish).
1-2 days later they trade Buch. Buch's cap hit 5.8M, Blais cap hit 1.5M - net savings 4.3M.
Less than a week after that they sign Nemeth at a 2.5M cap hit.

The saved space from Buch wasn't for Copp and Vatrano because it was already spent long before they got here. Those 3 moves actually put them 1.9M in the hole on cap space.
So if they kept Buch they have room for Copp, Vatrano and Motte? Come on.
The entire board acknowledged, and actually predicted, Buch would get moved both to free up cap and to make space for the young forwards. And that is exactly what happened. Was it a good trade? As it turns out, NO. Arguably we could have made a similar run keeping Buch, who knows? And the Kids didn't really get the benefit of too much top six time... But we all knew why the trade was made and it's revisionist by definition to pretend it was something different now.
 

Crease

Chief Justice of the HFNYR Court
Jul 12, 2004
24,508
26,882
The Rangers traded Buchnevich in July 2021, the day after acquiring Goodrow.

The Rangers went on to acquire Nemeth, Tinordi, and Reaves later that offseason. They also extended Zibanejad and Fox, though those raises didn't kick in immediately.

The Rangers sold the Buch trade as making room for the kids in 2021-22 and for raises beginning 2022-23. In hindsight, it was more about becoming more "North American." Which is ironic because Buch was probably their most physical top-six forward.
 

EdJovanovski

#RempeForCalder
Apr 26, 2016
30,024
60,322
The Rempire State
The Rangers traded Buchnevich in July 2021, the day after acquiring Goodrow.

The Rangers went on to acquire Nemeth, Tinordi, and Reaves later that offseason. They also extended Zibanejad and Fox, though those raises didn't kick in immediately.

The Rangers sold the Buch trade as making room for the kids in 2021-22 and for raises beginning 2022-23. In hindsight, it was more about becoming more "North American." Which is ironic because Buch was probably their most physical top-six forward.
Not to mention that Buch is as American as apple pie.
 

TopShelfSnipes

Snipes Like Tarasenkoooo
May 5, 2011
1,126
1,830
USA
So if they kept Buch they have room for Copp, Vatrano and Motte? Come on.
The entire board acknowledged, and actually predicted, Buch would get moved both to free up cap and to make space for the young forwards. And that is exactly what happened. Was it a good trade? As it turns out, NO. Arguably we could have made a similar run keeping Buch, who knows? And the Kids didn't really get the benefit of too much top six time... But we all knew why the trade was made and it's revisionist by definition to pretend it was something different now.
As I just showed a few posts above, yes, if they don't sign Goodrow and Nemeth.

As a matter of fact, they would have had even more cap space - 1.9M worth, to be exact.

But whatever it takes I guess to justify looking at this deal as "kinda sad, not that bad" instead of one of the worst deals made by any team in the NHL in the post lockout era...pretty much right up there with Montreal giving us McDonagh for basically Gomez and Ottawa giving up Zibby for Brassard and picks, and us giving up McDonagh and Miller for the brutal package of AHLers we got.

Again, if the cap space was "for the kids" why was the full cap savings (and more) from trading Buch spent on depth veterans +/- 7 days of the trade with nary a kid contract mentioned anywhere?
 
Last edited:

Vitto79

Registered User
May 24, 2008
27,555
3,784
Sarnia
Blais needs to come back and have a great month. If not he’s dumped at the deadline in order to bring others in
 

IDvsEGO

Registered User
Oct 11, 2016
5,167
5,084
Shocking... When the game is slowed down to a pace that suits Blais' lack of foot speed he becomes effective.

I hope he's traded before playing another NHL game so maybe some poor GM misjudges his ability.
Wait so you mean a guy recovering from a bad acl tear/surgery has bad foot speed?
Who would've thought?
 

Profet

Longtime lurker
Sponsor
Jul 5, 2002
7,317
10,415
NY
shop.profetkeyboards.com
And let me be clear. I thought the player that we initially got in Blais was wonderful and a breath of fresh air. His energy, hitting, and even his shot was quite good.

The version of Blais that we have now is not the player he was. No amount of wishing or hoping will change that. His knee is shot and his skating will never be the same.

Could I be wrong? Yeah sure... But as time goes on it becomes more and more likely that I'm correct. 1+ year after surgery and the dude is still skating at about 50%.
 
  • Like
Reactions: egelband

Lion Hound

@JoeTucc26
Mar 12, 2007
8,334
3,758
Montauk NY
We know the Offensive side of his game diminushed significantly since he arrived in NY. At least from a goal scoring perspective. The weird thing about Blais is this. Some areas actually increased. He doesn't appear to be nearly effective as he was early on as a physical forward, yet the date is showing something else.

Post injury with less icetime his hitting actually increased as did his shot blocks.

2021 36GP He averaged 2.8 Hits per game. (Pre Injury) TOI 12:04 10 Blocked Shots
2022 14GP He averages 2.6 hits per game (Pre Injury) TOI 13:28 37 Blocked Shots
2023 38GP He averages 2.9 Hits per game. (Post Injury) TOI 9:42 15 Blocked Shots

I guess what we aren't seeing is the big open ice hits he used to deliver and for a player who dosn't score goals you need that other "something". Doubt he is ever going to go back to the reckless forechecking style of play we saw in the small sample but I is interesting to see that he is still throwing the body.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad