Bleed Ranger Blue
Registered User
- Jul 18, 2006
- 19,799
- 1,811
NHL14. That's where.
LOL, yea because placing a premium in the future is an NHL14 move as opposed to cobbling assets together for aging stars.
NHL14. That's where.
OK, you name the list of premier players under 26 that have been traded and I'll this those above 26.I guess 10+ year vets are the only players that can be disgruntled.
OK, you name the list of premier players under 26 that have been traded and I'll this those above 26.
Seguin most recently.
Im too lazy. Seguin and Kessel come to mind, immediately.
Anyway, Im open to all options and looking for a commitment from the Rangers. Can you try to explain to me the strategy here besides the vague "trying to make the team better." Or better yet, how that goes beyond waiting for these post-26 year old players to fall out of favor with their current teams?
I don't understand why trying to make the team better isn't sufficient, but:Im too lazy. Seguin and Kessel come to mind, immediately.
Anyway, Im open to all options and looking for a commitment from the Rangers. Can you try to explain to me the strategy here besides the vague "trying to make the team better." Or better yet, how that goes beyond waiting for these post-26 year old players to fall out of favor with their current teams?
I really do feel like Yakupov is leaving eventually. Lots of talent, lots of potential, lots of trade value but he doesn't do enough to help that team win. Him or Eberle, they have to make that move.
St. Louis, Nash, Zuccarello, Yakupov: Winning The Right Way
I really do feel like Yakupov is leaving eventually. Lots of talent, lots of potential, lots of trade value but he doesn't do enough to help that team win. Him or Eberle, they have to make that move.
St. Louis, Nash, Zuccarello, Yakupov: Winning The Right Way
I don't understand why trying to make the team better isn't sufficient, but:
-Improving the PP
-Improving the 2nd line
-Improving 5-on-5 puck possession
-Improving team shooting percentage
"Acquiring elite talent when it forces its way on to your team" should be on the Mission Statement of every team. I don't get your beef here.
How old was Thorton at the time of the trade? Dion Phaneuf is another one I believe.Seguin most recently. Kessel. Van Riemsdyk. Jordan Staal. Not sure if Hodgson would count. Guys like Varlamov/Bobrovsky/Bishop who excelled after being traded. Jeff Carter was like 27 I think. Turris? Kovalchuk? James Neal. Shattenkirk / E. Johnson. Bobby Ryan.
I can only imagine what Yak will cost, especially if the Oilers feel the same way that their fans do![]()
Now they play a bunch of hockey games hoping to make the playoffs and make some noise in them.I have much beef.
If I could consolidate it into one thought it'd be "OK, we gave up 7 assets to get the best RW depth in the league. Now what?"
How old was Thorton at the time of the trade? Dion Phaneuf is another one I believe.
I have much beef.
If I could consolidate it into one thought it'd be "OK, we gave up 7 assets to get the best RW depth in the league. Now what?"
Yeah, I pretty much this. I can't imagine what the Rangers would look like now and in the time since if they signed Chara and traded for Thornton (though, again, I can't imagine what that trade would have looked like).Yeah, but the thing is you may have to wait for players like that to become available, and we're the Rangers. If not 26, he was more or less that age. San Jose seized the opportunity, and they had their #1C for the next decade.
The thing about those young assets that do move now and then is that most of them are moves that are broadcast because those young players are stuck in a spot where they can't get the minutes that they deserve and that their team wants from them. Seguin, Kessel, Staal - all on teams that had unsustainable depth at their positions.
Who is in a similar situation now?
I'd guess that Colorado is going to have to move a forward asset at some point, either a current roster player, or one who forces themselves into the NHL, and maybe St. Louis and Tampa too. Hard to say with defense.
I'd be more interested in being the team where a Staal, a Seguin or a Kessel could be expendable.
I'm just hoping that Callahan falls in love with Tampa and that 2nd turns into a 7th.
I think he's saying the 2nds effectively wash out.That is not how it works. We get a TB 2nd if he resigns. They get a 7th rounder too. If resigned it is:
Rangers:
MSL
TB 2015 2nd
TB:
Callahan
1st 2015
2nd 2014 (conditional)
7th 2015
It took me a while to realize you weren't talking about Mark Stuart.....Is the way Boston built their team really that magical? They got one of their most important players (as did a lot of teams) from the 2003 draft. Who did we take? They signed Chara instead of Redden.