BayStreetBullies*
Guest
Hes the product of an absurd PKSV% last year.
Do you remember what our PK was like before McClement arrived?
Hes the product of an absurd PKSV% last year.
I can't tell if your playen or not.
Dion with a higher cap hit then Crosby?
He would be the 3rd highest cap hit among all players, I think your mad.
This means we can keep all of our main FA's and afford to give the goalies a raise next year.
Huge news for us
So if a player doesnt put up any points he has no value? Wow, that's pretty awesome. You may want to look around the league, the majority of 3rd and 4th liners are not used as scoring options. It truly amazes me that you fail to realize that not only did McClement lead the NHL in PK time, but he also helped make the PK for the Leafs the best it has ever had in many many years. That's the value, yet here you are talking about needing scoring to validate value? Goc and the others do not have the same impact on special teams as does McClement. You really should do some research before posting.
Do you remember what our PK was like before McClement arrived?
You may want to reread my post cause you're clearly confused.
I recognize McClement has value and his lack of offence is a factor in that assessment so to not include in is foolish. PK specialist players of his skillset isn't what you overpay for and I provided examples of successful team who use that logic.
Have you seen our PK lately? That PK that McClement is apparently so vital in? That PK that is running at 77% right now? Seems like a similar number to that of the 77.4% it ran at with Tim Brent on it. With worse goaltending then too (Giguere and Gustavsson over half the season).
I'm dead serious. UFA status is a beautiful thing if you're a player (or an agent). Just look at the quality of the players who got 5 million as UFA's last year. What's more valuable, two 3rd liners with intangibles or whatever or 1 Dion Phaneuf?
Getzlaf (as just one example) got just over 8 per year. You think if he hit UFA status he wouldn't get 10? What would you rather have, Getzlaf? Or Bozak and Clarkson? Bolland and Clarkson perhaps? I don't know about you, but I take the elite guy if I can and if I have to overpay by a mere 1 million per year I could care less.
What Crosby makes is totally irrelevant.
Answering a question with a question I see. It's ok, people usually do that when it's inconvenient to their argument.
If you're somehow implying that the Leafs' recent plummet with the PK rests on the shoulders of McClement, then I'm going to assume you have some kind of agenda.
Don't forget Kessels pay rise kicks in and will eat some of that up.
Im not putting it on him at all. Im stating that hes not the PK god send youre all making him to be. He an interchangeable part. Sure hes adequate enough, but outside of being decent on a PK what purpose does he serve? No offence at all, not that great of a possession game. Be quite easy to find someone that can provide adequate penalty killing ability along with being able to provide at least a sliver of offence as well.
Well obviously you and I differ on how contracts and player value are negotiated.
I don't see Dion getting anything close to 9m on the open market.
Dave Bolland - Keep
Nikolai Kulemin - Trade
Jay McClement - Keep
Mason Raymond - Depends on Price
Trevor Smith - Meh, he can stay
Dion Phaneuf - Keep
Mark Fraser - Can Go
Paul Ranger - Keep
James Reimer - Keep
Jake Gardiner - Keep
Ranger @ 1.2
Phaneuf @ 7.2
Bolland @ 3.5
McClement @ 1.8
Raymond @ 2.5 MAX
Reimer @ 2.9
Gardiner @ 2-3M?
Smith @ 850K
22Mish to re-sign all of these.
You may want to reread my post cause you're clearly confused.
I recognize McClement has value and his lack of offence is a factor in that assessment so to not include in is foolish. PK specialist players of his skillset isn't what you overpay for and I provided examples of successful team who use that logic.
Don't forget Kessels pay rise kicks in and will eat some of that up.
I would be willing to bet you that the Oilers would offer that easily to Phaneuf if he hit the open market, I'd almost guarantee it. Philly and Anaheim are two other teams that would go balls out to get Phaneuf as well.
Im not putting it on him at all. Im stating that hes not the PK god send youre all making him to be. He an interchangeable part. Sure hes adequate enough, but outside of being decent on a PK what purpose does he serve? No offence at all, not that great of a possession game. Be quite easy to find someone that can provide adequate penalty killing ability along with being able to provide at least a sliver of offence as well.
I don't think 9 million per year for Phaneuf will come easily from anyone. Maybe a slim chance if for some reason there is some bidding war between extremely desperate teams.
I'm talking about the theoretical scenario where Phaneuf waits until UFA season starts and waits for the offers to roll in. That's not a negotiation, it's a bidding war/auction.
If you don't think he gets anything close to 9m in that scenario, I think you're sadly mistaken. I hope we never find out.
Editing to add this question - just for fun.
Let's say that Getzlaf was somehow available to the Leafs for 10 million per year starting next year for say 7 years. No negotiation, just take it or leave it.
Do you say yes or no? I'm saying yes and sign the paper as fast as I can before he changes his mind.
I can pretty much assure you, offence is not a major factor at all when the Leafs signed McClement initially. Tell me something, how is paying McClement 1.5 to maybe 2.2 overpriced when he is one of the best PKers and excellent fourth liners in the NHL? Goaltending, PK and PP are becoming more of the deciding factors in winning hockey games, and if the Leafs plan on having a decent PK, McClement is a must. I am convinced you want to see this team tank, and scoring goals seems to be the only comparable you weigh against players to determine their value.
How does me mentioning his complete lack of offence mean I don't like him? It simply means that him not helping our bottom 6 contribute doesn't help us in that aspect of the game and that he needs to compared to other players of his similar skillset and paid accordingly.
I've compared McClement to top PKers from other teams and how highly successful teams like Pittsburgh, Chicago, Boston have chosen not to overpay role players which saves them money which allows them to fit in more higher end talents (some who in addition to killing penalties also contribute a lot more like scoring).
Find me comparables to McClement that make 2 million or more on good teams if you're going to make a case for why we need to retain him if he wants to get paid a premium for what he brings.
It's also worth noting McClement was playing at his peak value last season but if he slips much he is closer to an AHLer than an NHLer.
Don't forget Kessels pay rise kicks in and will eat some of that up.
How does me mentioning his complete lack of offence mean I don't like him? It simply means that him not helping our bottom 6 contribute doesn't help us in that aspect of the game and that he needs to compared to other players of his similar skillset and paid accordingly.
I've compared McClement to top PKers from other teams and how highly successful teams like Pittsburgh, Chicago, Boston have chosen not to overpay role players which saves them money which allows them to fit in more higher end talents (some who in addition to killing penalties also contribute a lot more like scoring).
Find me comparables to McClement that make 2 million or more on good teams if you're going to make a case for why we need to retain him if he wants to get paid a premium for what he brings.
It's also worth noting McClement was playing at his peak value last season but if he slips much he is closer to an AHLer than an NHLer.[/QUOTE]
So last year he was the NHL's PK minute leader, best PK forward and Lebrun and others thought he should have won the Selke. Yet here you are saying if he regresses slightly he is an AHLer? That's awesome.