Reimer just left the game. Looks pretty serious, he can't put any weight on his left knee.
Miller to Toronto?
Kadri, JVR, +
Speculation: Sabres Talk - Proposals, Speculation, Roster-shaping
- Thread starter Chainshot
- Start date
- Status
Kadri, JVR, +
Beerz
Registered User
- Jun 28, 2011
- 36,794
- 13,098
No and No.
Want no part of Kadri....and JVR is just Stafford with a longer name.
I forgot to add the
My bad.......I wouldn't trade Miller to the Eastern Conference.....he's going out west if he is to be traded
zenthusiast
cybersabre his prophet
- Oct 20, 2009
- 19,173
- 6,712
La Cosa Nostra
Caporegime
- Jun 25, 2009
- 14,112
- 2,379
They can have Armia too.
Armia and Stafford is fair value IMO.At the end of the day Pavelski has scored 60+ points a mere two times.
Armia and Stafford is fair value IMO.At the end of the day Pavelski has scored 60+ points a mere two times.
Tyler2829
Registered User
Bah..everyone is available. I doubt a new coach will help. If I'm wrong great...i don't think that's the case.
stokes84
Registered User
To
Drew Stafford
To
Joe Pavelski
I
Same Cap Hit. Sabres Need a Center. Sharks need a Winger. For 2 teams that are truly Struggling... Why Not?
San Jose is 7-3-2. If that is truly struggling, sign me up. Pavelski has 14 points. Stafford doesn't have a goal yet. We'd have to throw something stupid at them to even have them listen, and then still, why would they trade a core piece of a good team.
Imagine if Calgary came to us and said, "you're struggling, we're struggling. How about Stempniak for Pominville.". That would actually be more reasonable than this offer.
Last edited:
stokes84
Registered User
It's not worth winning if you can't win big.
Myers + Grigorenko + 1st for Giroux, assuming the Flyers continue to struggle.
Myers + Grigorenko + 1st for Giroux, assuming the Flyers continue to struggle.
Jim Bob
RIP RJ
Do the Flyers want to get younger, though?
Plus, I don't think they have the cap space to make that deal.
Giroux - $3.75M
Myers - $5.5M
Grigs - $1.775M
vcv
Registered User
stokes84
Registered User
You can eat cap space, and Giroux is an RFA after next season and you can bet he'll get 8+ million.
Just saying, this team needs another Lafontainian type trade. Let's go big here. Trading Stafford is treading water.
stokes84
Registered User
99.999% sure they wouldn't. But Giroux has been struggling wearing the C. If it continues, maybe they decide they made the wrong choice.
Philly loves their big, dominating D-men, and after missing out on Weber, they look at Myers and see the potential. Grigorenko could eventually be near Giroux's level and high 1st as a throw in. Just throwing something out there.
Last edited:
Jim Bob
RIP RJ
How does that work for the Sabres, then?
When you eat cap space, it doesn't just disappear into thin air. And it's not like the Flyers cap situation gets a whole lot better after this season.
stokes84
Registered User
I don't know, I was just throwing something out there. If you want to use it as a starting point and develop it into something more realistic and workable, feel free.
tsujimoto74
Moderator
- May 28, 2012
- 30,635
- 23,422
...Why? The way this team is going, I'd rather have those 3 assets than G. Our 1st is probably going to be top 10, if not top 5 (I don't care that they managed to win a few games, they still look ******). Grigorenko has 1C potential, and Hodgson has been playing well enough in that role anyway, so I don't see that as a pressing need. And the potential for our blue line to be good in the future drops off significantly if we dump Myers.
No thanks.
You're crazy... Giroux is a certified superstar in my book. If all you have to give up is 3 "hopes and dreams" to get him... you do it without thinking twice.
for Claude Giroux, i would trade as much as they wanted... here have the whole awful roster... whatever pieces you want.
http://hfboards.mandatory.com/showthread.php?t=1175447
http://hfboards.mandatory.com/showthread.php?t=1175447
You wouldn't make that trade? You get out from underneath what may be a complete albatross of a contract (Myers), and you give up potential in Grigorenko, who is far from a sure thing, and a 1st for one of the top five players in the entire National Hockey League.
It's a no-brainer, IMO.
stokes84
Registered User
Vanek-Hodgson-Pominville
Ott-Giroux-Leino (Armia)
Foligno-Ennis-Stafford
If you pull off that trade, you have a group of forwards that are worthy of the Cup, IMO.
Jim Bob
RIP RJ
vcv
Registered User
Giroux would HAVE to center Vanek and Pominville, otherwise his talents would be wasted.
Also, that would be the best line in the NHL, no question.
stokes84
Registered User
- Status
