toddkaz
Registered User
- Nov 25, 2022
- 6,314
- 3,860
I asked that question over the summer and Chainshot said no chance
well the idea of UPL making the team still seems pretty likely, to START, its been laid out many times how 3 goalies is a pretty easy option to begin the season, when you look at the 13/7/3 math, the early season schedule with lots of home games and light travel, the option to 'paper transaction' Levi on nights he isnt starting if they want to get a look at an Amerk, see how the goalies perform before having to make an actual decision.Lance and Joe were laughing at the idea of UPL not making the team just last week in their podcast. They acted like they had insider info of some kind imo…turns out that the local reporters still don’t know any more than the average fan with regards to inside stuff.
I had a feeling at the time that their reaction wouldn’t age well and here we are only 6 days later and they sound kinda silly already. I still will always enjoy the podcast regardless.
Your concern is that everyone is good?Comrie is a UFA after this season. If Levi is great as #1 and they trade UPL, and Comrie is a good backup, then they still need a plan for next season.
Finding number two is much easier than finding number one. If Levy is good and Comrie is okay, they could just re-sign Comrie or find someone similar in a UFA or trade next summer.Comrie is a UFA after this season. If Levi is great as #1 and they trade UPL, and Comrie is a good backup, then they still need a plan for next season.
Backup goalie might be our only real offseason need next summer….with too many prospects in the system to sign/fit, it shouldn’t be too hard to find a backup goalie.Comrie is a UFA after this season. If Levi is great as #1 and they trade UPL, and Comrie is a good backup, then they still need a plan for next season.
Depends how Stillman and Joki look + injuries. We'll see said the blind man!Ryan Johnson is going to be this season's Samuelsson or Pysyk - better than some guys on the NHL roster, but in Rochester by circumstance.
Eh we certainly don't have to trade him. If he's stagnant for another year in Rochester then they'll have to start making decisions.Trading UPL is no loss. My only micro concern is if he has more ceiling. I doubt it but goalies can bloom late.
Trading UPL is no loss. My only micro concern is if he has more ceiling. I doubt it but goalies can bloom late.
Slightly off topic but related Johansson with the shutout tonight and Vasilevskiy out for a couple of months. Late bloomer? Or just a good game?I had really high hopes for UPL after that one great year in the OHL, but his glove hand is a major weakness that teams repeatedly exposed last year. I doubt he is able to improve it much. On top of that he really seemed to have trouble reading/anticipating the play and also covering pucks in tight.
His size and athleticism are both great traits, but the weaknesses will always leave you wanting more, even in a backup. With Levi as the starter, I feel more comfortable with Comrie as the backup.
Slightly off topic but related Johansson with the shutout tonight and Vasilevskiy out for a couple of months. Late bloomer? Or just a good game?
Buffalo also gave up on him around the same timeline they are with UPL.
We can afford the luxury of carrying 3 goalies for now, some teams run short rosters and have less spare skaters with 2 goalies. When even Martin gets picked from waivers maybe wait till all teams who would like to pick up a goalie got one before we waive one.I had both Benson and Savoie more NHL ready than Rosen and Kulich at the end of last year, and my mind hasn’t changed. Rosen and Kulich are awesome prospects and I believe both are going to make it in the NHL, but they need to start the year in the AHL.
Ryan Johnson is probably good enough to be in the NHL now, but I think you start him in their AHL while the Sabres figure out what they have with rest of the defense. But johnson will come up and never get sent down at some point this season.
And I think they just need to pick one of UPL and Comrie. Enough of three goalie nonsense
I doubt he makes it through waiversEh we certainly don't have to trade him. If he's stagnant for another year in Rochester then they'll have to start making decisions.
I'm not sure. If a team claims a player aren't they required to keep that player on their NHL roster for 30 days?I doubt he makes it through waivers
The state of goaltending in the NHL overall is not very good. I can't imagine teams wouldn't take a flyer on a young guy like UPL who has upside.I'm not sure. If a team claims a player aren't they required to keep that player on their NHL roster for 30 days?
A team with an established 1a goaltender and very little need for a backup might need someone short term. But not sure UPL has done enough to cement an NHL roster spot.
It's not a sure thing he would get picked up, but why take more risk than we have to?The state of goaltending in the NHL overall is not very good. I can't imagine teams wouldn't take a flyer on a young guy like UPL who has upside.
When even Martin gets picked from waivers maybe wait till all teams who would like to pick up a goalie got one before we waive one.
I honestly thought you were talking about Patty Kane for a second there until I noticed you wrote 'her'. Was she a poster on this board like a decade+ ago? PK sounds familiar.I think PK and her kids are at the game - I'm making dinner but that looked like it was them in that crowd shot.
I'd say so. I still think Kulich is closer, but both need work.Was that the last game for Kulich and Rosen?
Better than running 3 goalies on the NHL roster with 2 of them being "in development." Trade him if we can get an asset back, waive him and either have him claimed or send him down to Rochester; all are better scenarios for everyone involved than having him as the #3 in Buffalo imoThe state of goaltending in the NHL overall is not very good. I can't imagine teams wouldn't take a flyer on a young guy like UPL who has upside.