Speculation: Sabres Roster Speculation - Pre-season 2023 Edition
- Thread starter Chainshot
- Start date
- Status
I don't think there's space on the roster for two seperate acquisitions.
And IMO they need a guy to come in to be part of that core group built around Dahlin/Power moving forward.
Not a guy who is a question mark. Not a guy who might give them one or two good seasons before falling off, potentially leaving us in the same position next year or the year after.
Have you seen me push that narrative? There's a HUGE difference between a 28-30 yo & a signing a 35 yo...I have heard the narrative of "guys that fit the age profile of the core" a ton. So, that is why I put the parameters as guys that are 26yo now.
And my guess is that anyone who is 28-30 and has significant term will get a "that contract won't age well..." reaction a lot of the time.
Expanding the age range to 30 adds 34 more players to the pool of potential trade targets. But, 25 of those 34 have trade protection now or in the future.
You also need to remove the filter for being under contract through 2024-25. I haven't once said we should only target players who are signed long term. Certain posters have - to put it bluntly those posters are wrong.
Andersson/Weegar would both be dream signings. If i were to add another guy from Calgary it would be Hanifin instead of Tanev. Any of these guys might be possible if they decide to rebuild.
Theodore would be another dream signing but it seems totally unrealistic.
Pesce would be another great fit. The last time i checked we ARE allowed to offer players extensions....
Dumba would be such a let down consolation prize at this point. With the assets Adams has - not making a trade by then should be a firable offence.
Jim Bob
RIP RJ
Zman5778
Moderator
Hanifin needs a new contract at a number that's probably more than we're willing to pay him. Tanev would come far more cheaply both in assets and re-sign dollar.
Old Navy Goat
Registered User
Doubt Hanifin would want to come here seeing as how tight he's with Eichel.
Zman5778
Moderator
Didn't realize he and Eichel were tight.
Which also brings me to:
Forget any Brisson client waiving an NTC to come here. Which makes me wonder what happens with Power down the line to a certain extent.
toddkaz
Registered User
- Nov 25, 2022
- 6,348
- 3,882
I don't see Adams paying the price to get a guy that fits your scenario. I think we bring in someone thats 28-29 and is a bit cheaper that can do the job. Stay at home defenseman thats solid.
I just don't see Buffalo trading its 1st rounder or A prospects to get a top 4 defender under 26 years old.
I think they try to get one of Mayfield Serverson or Gudas.
Ace
Registered User
- Oct 29, 2015
- 24,961
- 31,423
They sure seemed like they tried to move that first for exactly that at the deadline. Moving Savoie or Kulich…we know they won’t. But every GM isn’t Arizona’s GM
Der Jaeger
Generational EBUG
Ace
Registered User
- Oct 29, 2015
- 24,961
- 31,423
Adams was way more detailed than ever answering questions on deadline day about Chychrun. He said the ask from Arizona was different for them than Ottawa. Made a point to say teams inquired about Savoie and Kulich and they were non starters. He came off as annoyed they didn’t have a chance to pay what Ottawa did and he was in on Chychrun until the end. Which means…there’s no way our first wasn’t what he was trying to send. They would take it from Ottawa…but wanted an A prospect from us.
I wouldn’t make the deal either. But I would trade that first for Another top 4 d in a heartbeat
Jacob582
Registered User
- Oct 16, 2012
- 10,169
- 3,784
My read on what Adams said tells me Kulich is slated for Rochester.
Matt Ress
Don't sleep on me
I feel the same way. I do think Savoie has a pretty good shot but I'd like to see Kulich in ROC next year ripping it up. By 24/25 Kulich and maybe Kozak or Nadeau could be ready. Having an actual competitive NHL team will allow us to develop young guys and grow assets from within with control.
I don't necessarily think that's a problem. I don't see Hanifin commanding more than some of the other names discussed.
The Eichel thing is a complete non factor. In fact i believe that he has experience with Granato which may even push it the other way....
Just brutal.
Adams already has more offensive players/prospects than he possibly knows what to do with. And a big huge f***ing hole on the backend because for the most part he's neglected the position during his tenure. A hole that if filled previously - would undoubtedly have seen this team make the playoffs.
The ONLY logical thinking would be suggesting he trade from a position of strength to fill a position of weakness.
We can hate on Adams' plan to bank on Levi in goal. But at least that involves a 21 yo highly rated prospect getting games & potentially breaking out.
He doesn't even have a plan on defence. Nothing on the roster, or in the pipeline. Another band aid/reclamation project/overpaid past-it UFA isn't going to get it done.
The Blunder Years
Registered User
If the Leafs lose to Tampa, can we seriously expect some talk about signing Matthews with the Matthews/Granato connection?
Ace
Registered User
- Oct 29, 2015
- 24,961
- 31,423
Forgetting about guys i think are completely out of reach :
Potential available due to a defensive logjam:
LA (any number of guys)
Potential rebuild:
Calgary (Andersson, Weegar, Hanifin)
St Louis (Parayko)
Winnipeg (Pionk)
Potential cap crunch:
Boston (Carlo)
Carolina (Pesce)
NY Rangers (Miller, Lindgren Schneider)
Vegas (Theodore/Whitecloud/Hague)
I'm not even going to list Tampa.
Plus there may be other guys that we don't yet know are available...
Jim Bob
RIP RJ
I could live with 4 out of those 5.
I think Schneider is getting vastly overrated right now.
Der Jaeger
Generational EBUG
I don't think he's overrated. I think he's one of the few options that meets the requirement for a defensive defenseman in the age range of the group. I'm not parting with Kulich for him, however.
- Status
